Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing To Chicago- What With Seattle?  
User currently offlineApuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3036 posts, RR: 10
Posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1875 times:

Tody I read on this forum that Boeing is moving its corporate HQ from Seattle to Chicago.

I wonder what will happen to Seattle. Whenever somebody says 'Seattle', they say 'Boeing', right?

To me, Seattle is, and will always be the aviation capital of the world, where aviation history was made. It doesn't matter where they are moving their Corporate HQ to. To be honest, I even sort of disrespect Boeing for this move! Luckily some of the Boeing factory plants remain in the vicinity of Seattle!

What's your opinion:

Do you think aviation enthousiasts will eventually loose interest in Seattle?


Ivan Coninx - Brussels Aviation Photography
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineRominato From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 268 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1858 times:

Why Seattle? Becasue of one company? It could be argued that Southern California is the aviation capital of the world considering the history with many different men, companies, and projects... Seattle had one company... what else justifies it as the aviation capital of the world?

User currently offlineN400QX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1838 times:

I agree- with Boeing and all, Seattle may well be the aviation capital of the world. But just because corporate HQ has decided to relocate doesn't mean anyone connected to aviation will lose interest in Seattle. We will still have the two assembly plants, the space/military facilities, parts facilities- everything.

I, too, have lost any ounce of respect I had left for Condit (long story), and suspect, as do the hundreds of thousands of Boeing employees in Seattle, that this is merely a ploy to get further away from the workers themselves. This isn't about taxes. This isn't about living conditions. This isn't about anything they said it is about.

Hopefully the Boeing corporate brass won't leave Commercial Airplanes CEO Alan Mullaly to be the pinata, if you will, for the Seattle area. I think he is a good man with great visions for Boeing Commercial Airplanes Group.

A sad day in Seattle.

>Whenever somebody says 'Seattle', they say 'Boeing', right?

Well, we've still got COFFEE! We are still the coffee capital of the world...

User currently offlineMoeKha786 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1812 times:

Seattle's weak

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qantas To Chicago-What Happened? posted Fri Jun 10 2005 10:54:08 by Avalon
Boeing To Chicago - Denver's Response posted Mon May 14 2001 12:09:28 by LoneStarMike
Boeing To Replace The 737 With Two Models? posted Tue Aug 15 2006 21:45:28 by Tangowhisky
What Airbus Needs To Do To Break Even With A370(?) posted Wed Jun 14 2006 13:24:54 by FWAERJ
KE Signs With Connexion By Boeing To Become Asia¡¦s posted Tue Jan 17 2006 03:30:54 by Kalsky
Boeing - SQ Must Buy Boeing To Compete With QF? posted Mon Dec 26 2005 21:06:14 by Halibut
QantasLink To Replace BAe146s With Boeing 717s posted Fri Oct 29 2004 08:57:21 by QantasffCL
Boeing Trying To Avoid Spat With Airbus posted Thu Sep 23 2004 16:22:39 by Nyc777
Iraq To Negotiate With Boeing To Lease Aircraft posted Thu Nov 13 2003 18:14:16 by EurostarVA
What's With All The Boeing Bashing? posted Fri Sep 19 2003 16:42:36 by BCAInfoSys