Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are ComAir Pilots Greedy...or Is The More To This?  
User currently offlineCdfmxtech From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1338 posts, RR: 27
Posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2142 times:

I haven't been paying attention to this strike stuff...can someone fill me in. I read bits and pieces of the situation. From the little I've heard it sounds like greed!! Correct me if I'm wrong.

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLexPassenger From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 52 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2096 times:

Wishi is mostly right.

Also management has gone out of its way to piss the pilots off. Didn't help.

Also seems to be a fair amount of personalities at play. Some of the local union leaders seem to have a real attitude problem with the company.

Evidence posted here & elsewhere suggests that the Mediation Board compromise was an okay deal pilots should have accepted, and then moved on. They didn't, by a huge margin. This means something is terribly wrong at this company. Probably best in the long run for all concerned if the company is wound up, even if there is short term pain.

Very sorry to see it come the this.




User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2089 times:

Look at JETPILOT's post in the tech ops forum he has summed it up very accurately!
Iain


User currently offlineMiller22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2080 times:

The huge margin was due to the duty day disputes between Comair and ALPA. Comair wants 14 hours maximum per day, pilots want much less. Remember, however that a pilot who works 14 hours a day gets the appropriate rest afterwards as required by FAA (FAA allows 16 hour days).

lainhol,
This isn't a time to argue whether or not the pilots should keep holding out, its time to speculate on where the 1100 pilots remaining will go once they're let go by Comair. Negotiations are over. Yesterday was D-Day, and both sides lost.


User currently offlineDE727UPS From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 814 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2068 times:

I don't think the pilots are being greedy if you know anything about the background of Comair....a company that had record profits do to RJ's and a company that started the pay for training mess. Would you say the NW mechanics were greedy with the deal they got? I wouldn't, I'd say the NW mechs fought as an organized labor group to get what they deserved....and negotiated and voted in a contract that they could live with.

I still think it's out of place for anyone who isn't a Comair pilot to make assumptions about what they should or shouldn't have taken....it's a very complex situation...and now the Comair pilots have a lawsuit against ALPA, too. Talking about a weird mess.....







User currently offlineCAETravlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 908 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2055 times:

I don't think it was totally the pilots fault as individuals. I think it is a result of taking the word of union leadership too seriously. Unions can be a good thing, as they are supposed to represent the best interests of a group of employees. However, the ALPA thought that management was bluffing, and assured its constituents that there was something better to be had. It looks as if now the alternative they are going to get to the NMBs proposal is unemployment.


A woman drove me to drink and I didn't have the decency to thank her. - W.C. Fields
User currently offlineMiller22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2053 times:

CAE

Good point! Through all of the pilot bashing here (I admit I was one) it is important to remember that the individuals aren't to blame in every instance. You hit that one right on the head!



User currently offlineTwotterwrench From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2015 times:

DE727 - The NW mechanics made large concessions in accepting the contract that they did. It's called COMPROMISE! That's what you do when you negotiate. They accepted the contract that they did in order to avoid harming the airline both financially and in reputation. Sure, they got some of what they wanted, but as far as wages go, they settled for less than half of what their original contract demands were. Comair pilots rejected what could have been a 308% pay raise for some of them. There is no compromise with ALPA, and now it has cost 5000 people their jobs and people who flew Comair are out one more carrier they could afford to travel on. And Iain, Jet pilot, as usual, has no more idea what is going on at Comair than anyone else does. As usual, he is spouting emotion that is not supported in fact. Anything he has said on the matter is pure speculation.

User currently offlineDE727UPS From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 814 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1989 times:

USA Today said last week that starting pay for the NW mechanics is now 50K a year. They deserve it, if you ask me. Just for comparison...UPS pilots start at 26K a year.

"They accepted the contract that they did in order to avoid harming the airline both financially and in reputation"

I respectfully disagree....I bet they voted it in because they felt it was an acceptable contract for them. When you're an airline employee who is part of an organized labor group and you're in contract talks with the company.....the company is not your friend. They are trying just as hard to give as little as possible as you are trying to better yourself. If the Northwest mechanics were so pro-company they wouldn't have threatened a strike......but next time I see one I'll ask him if he accepted his contract to "avoid harming the airline both financially and in reputation". Hope he doesn't laugh at me too hard....


User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1982 times:

regional airline pilots are not supposed to make as much as major airline pilots!!! I don't know of a single regional airline in any country that pays their pilot major airline wages.

User currently offlineTwotterwrench From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1977 times:

Actually, DE, since you are SOOOOOO smart, I am sure I am wasting my time here, but that is a quote from a union rep. Also, one of the reasons that NW mechs threatened a strike was that 5 years ago, they took a pay cut and made other concessions in order to keep the company afloat. Now, after 5 years have gone by and everything is hunky dory, they feel they should get their share of the good coming down the pipe and rightfully so. I have no reason whatsoever to doubt that what the mechs did was done so at least in part out of concern for the company as a whole. If they didn't care about the company, why take the cuts they did 5 years ago? Think their pilots could ever "lower" themselves that much in the company's best interest??? now it's my turn to laugh...

User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1967 times:

I think IMHO, Comair pilots are getting really greedy...they are the highest paid regional pilots in the US, and they want more? That spells G-R-E-E-D-Y in my mind...

Just my two cents (which I hope dont go to Comair's pilots)

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineDE727UPS From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 814 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

Twotter....are you suggesting that a pilot group has never given consessions to help their company during bad times? It's happened before and it will happen again....when necessary.

and you are wasting your time.......


User currently offlineTwotterwrench From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1941 times:

It happenend when? That UPS thing you were talking about??? All I can find about that is that a few pilots walked out on a few flights but not a company wide thing by any means. Even so, pilots, like anyone else need to know when to draw the line and shutting down the company permanently is WAY over the line. You aren't gonna find a lot of public support on this one dude. The public won't tolerate the kind of greed that costs 5000 people their jobs. The death knoll doth toll for ALPA... hehehehehe

User currently offlineAmtran727 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1933 times:

I am so pissed at Comair rite now, its costing me my last chance at an L10 Flite, DAMN them pilots!!!!!!!!  Pissed

User currently offlineDE727UPS From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 814 posts, RR: 14
Reply 15, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1929 times:

Teamsters strike against UPS in 1997. The rampers and truckers struck for better work rules and more full time jobs. Pilots honored the strike and walked the lines with the rampers and drivers. Some aircraft and trucks were operated by management but not much. The strike lasted nearly two weeks and the pilots didn't fly. Pilots gained nothing other than the goodwill and respect of the rampers and truck drivers....there was no benefit to pilots contract or jobs. By the way....almost all the aircraft mechanics walked, too.

User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4487 posts, RR: 33
Reply 16, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1923 times:

It's always funny to hear one group of players in the airline business talk about how the others have "no right to comment" on the actions of other groups of players. Human affairs are a social matter...everyone's involved, and everyone's affected. In the airline business, the interest groups are roughly three: consumers; management/ shareholders; and employees (who have subgroups themselves). We all have an interest in the business surviving and thriving, and thus reason to discuss each other's actions.

The only requirement to form an opinion and discuss it, is that one consults the data and shows respect (if not necessarily warm-fuzziness) towards others in the discussion. I'd no more deny the right of employees to comment on consumer questions, or pilots to comment on management issues, as long as they're informed and show respect.

As I've said in other threads, my own assessment is that the Comair pilots did a bad thing rejecting the NMB offer,for reasons others have stated well on this thread. A lot of us mere mortals who aren't pilots (and some who are) recognize that Comair pilots really lost their heads here and are destroying a company. Spare us the "you just don't understand" stuff. Nobody's talking about the feeling of flying. We're talking about the business we all have an interest in. And sadly, we're about to lose one of its really fine companies, Comair.

Jim


User currently offlineMiller22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1897 times:

Just to show what the Union tells the public, and how twisted the information is they feed the pilots, here is some factual information on the alleged 45 minute increase in actual duty day:


The Offer, which represents ALPA's last table position, actually proposes a decrease in the
maximum scheduled and actual duty day.

Current Contract (Section 12.D):

Maximum Scheduled Duty Day: 14 hours
Maximum Actual Duty Day (due to irregular operations): FAR's (16 hours)

The Offer (Section 12.D.1 and 12.D.2):

Maximum Scheduled Duty Day: Ranges from 11 hours and 15 minutes to 13 hours and 30
minutes
Maximum Actual Duty Day: Ranges from 12 hours and 30 minutes to 14 hours and 45
minutes

These changes result in a reduction to the scheduled duty period ranging from 30 minutes to 2
hours and 45 minutes and a reduction to the actual duty period due to irregular operations ranging
from 1 hour and 15 minutes to 3 hours and 30 minutes. Incidentally, these maximum scheduled
and actual duty periods proposed in the Offer are the shortest duty periods among airlines
operating similar equipment to Comair.




by the way...You can download the entire contract at http://www.comair.com


User currently offlineCdfmxtech From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1338 posts, RR: 27
Reply 18, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1891 times:

Please do not turn this into a Pilots vs. Technician thingg. This forum has been down the road b4 and it gets ugly.



User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 19, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1896 times:

What people (and especially the unions) seem to forget is "what can the company afford to pay".
If the Comair shareholders fold the company, they are fully within their rights to do so. Currently the strike by Comair pilots is threatening not just the jobs of their fellow Comair personell (all 4000+ of them, with 2000 jobs already slashed. Those 2000 cannot be pilots, because it is illegal to fire people on strike...), but also tens of thousands of jobs at parent company Delta airlines. If Comair goes bankrupt because of this, the full burden of paying of the resultant debts will fall on Delta, causing major financial trouble there as well. All that for a few pilots who think a major payraise combined with shorted working hours is not enough?

The same happened years ago when pilots went on strike with (I think it was) PanAm. The company went under and thousands lost their jobs because a few percent of them refused to accept the maximum the company could pay without going under...



I wish I were flying
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WOW- Guess This Is The Way To Advertise! posted Wed Aug 18 2004 09:19:46 by Maiznblu_757
Which Is The More Efficient: F50, DH3 Or AT4? posted Thu Feb 19 2004 16:02:48 by Pe@rson
Ohio Is The Place To Be For Aviation This Summer posted Mon Jun 23 2003 20:21:06 by FlyCMH
What is the reason for this cabin service? posted Sat Feb 4 2006 06:40:47 by DL4EVR
Who Is The Woman In This Picture? posted Sun Jul 17 2005 10:41:05 by Trident2e
What Is The Sense Of This RE: AZ posted Sat Jan 8 2005 06:14:26 by TUNisia
What Airliner Is The A350 To Replace? posted Mon Nov 29 2004 21:50:11 by Aerlingus330
Where Is The Road To LHR? posted Sat Jun 5 2004 00:34:59 by Venezuela747
Pilots: How Insulting Is The "bus Driver" Commet? posted Sat Apr 10 2004 02:47:23 by Lehpron
When is the EC225 to enter commercial service? posted Wed Feb 25 2004 20:56:12 by NORTHSEATIGER