Bt824 From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 7 posts, RR: 0 Posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3507 times:
Does anyone have any info re VX's potential entry into ORD? I know that Cush mentioned a possible 1Q entry, and I noticed today that they have reduced frequencies on many of their routes for the 1Q (eg: LAX-IAD, LAX-BOS, SFO-IAD, SFO-BOS are down to 2x daily for many days of the week). Is this to free up planes for upcoming ORD service, or are they just parking planes on certain days b/c of depressed demand? Any insight, or even speculation, would be much appreciated. Thanks!
LACA773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 3876 posts, RR: 2 Reply 6, posted (3 years 11 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2745 times:
Quoting Bt824 (Reply 5): Well if they are in fact seasonal reductions, then where are all of these aircraft being idled throughout the day? I never see any VX planes sitting idle at LAX, so I'm guessing SFO?
I've since noticed that LAX-SEA and SFO-SNA are down on frequencies as well, so this means a significant fall in fleet utilization. Has anyone seen parked planes at SFO?
VX is doing the right thing by making these reductions on their transcons, in particular, IAD & BOS as the demand is far from being the same as JFK. It's right sizing the market during this very slow time of year which is very smart as well as being able to have the flexibility to up and downgrade flights since they have both the 319 & 320, (something B6 can't do on their transcons). I am surprised about SFO-SNA. How are they doing in this market?
VX does not need to reduce frequencies on their current routes to open ORD as they will be receiving new a/c this year. I believe it's six (Can someone tell me what the best website is to look at airline fleet sizes, current, on order, in storage and retired? )?
Ckfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 4915 posts, RR: 1 Reply 8, posted (3 years 11 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2637 times:
Of course, this begs the question as to whether VX will be getting some of the old DL gates on Concourse L at ORD. I was at ORD the other day, and the DL curside signs are down on the departure level of Terminal 3, and the DL signs have been removed for the jetbridges on the odd side of L.
FWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3529 posts, RR: 2 Reply 9, posted (3 years 11 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2342 times:
Quoting Ckfred (Reply 8): Of course, this begs the question as to whether VX will be getting some of the old DL gates on Concourse L at ORD. I was at ORD the other day, and the DL curside signs are down on the departure level of Terminal 3, and the DL signs have been removed for the jetbridges on the odd side of L.
A photo on a popular photo sharing site shows that the DL gate areas at T3 Concourse L are vacant, too. The holdroom seating has been removed (wasn't it some of the last of the Herman Miller Eames sling seats at ORD?), the DL "Onward and Upward" decals and the metal Delta logo plates on the podiums are gone, and computer equipment has been disconnected. There is a sign saying that "Delta Airlines (sic) has moved to Terminal 2 Gates E9-E15".
As for gates: My source, a former UA exec, told me last month that AA has taken over some former DL L gates for AmericanConnection (RP) ops starting in April, but not others. The City of Chicago wouldn't let AA take all of them. The others will probably go to VX. No word on whether the SkyClub will become an Admirals Club.
[Edited 2010-01-09 09:56:11]
I don't work for FWA, their tenants, or their ad agency. But I still love FWA.
Your source is telling me the same things I am here here on the West Coast. According to my source is that Virgin has locked up gates or was very close as of 2 months ago.
There will be up to 6 airplanes coming this year. In the mean time right now the utilization is down as a seasonal reduction. VX still has their daily SFO-spare at the plot and frequently have had a spare on the north side as well either plot 8 or 9.
SNA has not been as strong as hoped for VX. But the route is good enough and good for a/c utilization according to a manager here at SFO. LAX will also increase in the summer to at least 6., with a 7th begin discussed.
"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
LACA773 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 3876 posts, RR: 2 Reply 11, posted (3 years 11 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1890 times:
Quoting AS739X (Reply 10): SNA has not been as strong as hoped for VX. But the route is good enough and good for a/c utilization according to a manager here at SFO. LAX will also increase in the summer to at least 6., with a 7th begin discussed.
Thanks for the information, AS739X. I was wondering how they were doing on their SFO-SNA flights. I thought they'd do very well compared to what UA offers.
I'm looking forward to them starting LAX-ORD. It will give us a refreshing change over the norm.
ElBandGeek From United States of America, joined Jun 2008, 739 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (3 years 11 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1734 times:
Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 4): Chicago has been a hotbed of excuses for VX - I'll believe they are adding it when the first plane touches down.
My sentiments exactly.
VX has been whining for 2 years about how "unfair" ORD has been with gates. They seem to expect some special treatment just because they're Virgin America and they're here to save us from the evil UA and AA. If they want in so badly, they need to be willing to pay for it and compete.