NH Looking At IAH? — Civil Aviation Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

NH Looking At IAH?

Thomasphoto60 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3723 posts, RR: 25
Posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2283 times:

Per a report at IAH Spotters, via a WSJ (Wall Street), ANA is looking at IAH. Has anyone heard anything?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iahspottersclub/message/31087

Thomas

[Edited 2010-01-26 18:02:43 by thomasphoto60]

"Show me the Braniffs"

12 replies: All unread, jump to last

Kiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8435 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2273 times:

If CO/NH/UA get ATI would NH actually need to use their own metal into IAH or would they be better off using CO metal ?

Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)

BNAFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2261 times:

Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 1):
If CO/NH/UA get ATI would NH actually need to use their own metal into IAH or would they be better off using CO metal ?

I think Houston could support a second NRT flight. While CO seems the logical choice, putting an ANA 787 into there would be nice.

Shaq From Panama, joined Jun 2007, 284 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2227 times:

IAH CAN support a secont NRT flight, but I'm very optimistic about the UA/CO/NH ATI. Maybe CO want to fly a second frequency , but they're short in widebodies , so NH might be interested.

Studying hard, for flying right!

BMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 14347 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

Another variable would be premium demand. ANA's 77E would have an extra 20 J class seats than CO's, and ANA's 77W could add a first class product as well should the market warrant it. Also, it probably wouldn't hurt CO to free up a couple 777s, but I don't see them leaving.

Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?

Avek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4092 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2146 times:

I wouldn't be surprised if CO/NH rearrange their ops based on a HND/NRT split.

Live life to the fullest.

MAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31118 posts, RR: 73
Reply 6, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2089 times:

Quoting Avek00 (Reply 5):
I wouldn't be surprised if CO/NH rearrange their ops based on a HND/NRT split.

On what basis? CO-only to Haneda and ANA-only to Narita?

CO will - at most - get one of the four Haneda slots, and it is useless for Newark or Houston unless they want godawful times.

It would be an ideal situation to have what you suggest, but it won't be possible.

Carpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2772 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1983 times:

Definitely possible though a second frequency to the NYC area is a higher probability considering that NH is reconfiguring its 77W with even lower seating density.
NH has plenty of long-haul capacity now and upcoming, so anything is possible.
Note: Seat count will drop from 247 to something like 212. (This is on a 77W!)

EwRkId From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 594 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 3 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1882 times:

Quoting BNAFlyer (Reply 2):
I think Houston could support a second NRT flight. While CO seems the logical choice, putting an ANA 787 into there would be nice.

No doubt it would be a logical choice, I mean CO is short on Longhaul a/c as it is. I sure hope ICN is in the works for CO but where would start it from EWR or IAH hmm??

[Edited 2010-01-26 19:42:41]

CO58 From United States of America, joined Nov 2008, 46 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (3 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1482 times:

Has anyone thought about the possibility of a double daily 787 being operated by each airline at different times of the day? The JV makes that possible now.

COflyerBOS From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 289 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1331 times:

I have no inside knowledge, but God I hope so!

Ever since Star Alliance was announced, I've dreamt about adding NH to Narita and OZ to Seoul. It would certainly help free up some widebodies at CO which are much needed elsewhere in the system.

I'd be happy with letting CO shift even more INT'L focus to EWR if it meant landing more foreign carriers at IAH!

Thomasphoto60 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3723 posts, RR: 25
Reply 11, posted (3 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1260 times:

Quoting COflyerBOS (Reply 10):
I'd be happy with letting CO shift even more INT'L focus to EWR if it meant landing more foreign carriers at IAH!

You and me both, brother.

Thomas

"Show me the Braniffs"

Shaq From Panama, joined Jun 2007, 284 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1227 times:

Quoting COflyerBOS (Reply 10):
I'd be happy with letting CO shift even more INT'L focus to EWR if it meant landing more foreign carriers at IAH!

Hehehee I know why you say this lol !
But , in some destinations , IAH is higher yielding : GIG,EZE

Studying hard, for flying right!

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: