Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Does Service Matter In The UA/US Merger?  
User currently offlineImkeww From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3078 times:

The notion that the UA/US merger will be reviewed based on the operational performance of the two companies is erroneous.

Government authorities will review it based on competitive and employment issues.

Reviewing mergers based on a company's service is to take on a bias using subjective perception of an airline.

When the Feds rule, service will not have played a factor into their decision. While "United cannot keep its house in check", and that certainly cannot HELP the merger, the merger will not be rejected simply for this.

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4661 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (15 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3066 times:

As far as I know, Sherman Antitrust Act guidelines do not provide for a merger to be rejected simply due to the operational incompetence of the management of the senior partner. From my family's own extensive experience of the two airlines, though, the idea of Keystone Kops of Elk Grove getting their hands on US Airways' far superior ground level operation is frightening.

Fortunately, UA isn't getting US, at least not this year. We know you like this merger, Imkeww, but it's not happening. The substantial consumer and labor issues aside, the deal is no longer in United's interest. Goodwin would have to be insane to pay $60 per share for an airline that's around $27 per share these days. Not to mention a UA F/A revolt.

Of course, what am I talking about...sanity has never stopped Jim Goodwin from making boneheaded major mistakes before (eg caving to pilot terrorism last summer). But this one would top them all; UA is probably just waiting for the August 1 walk-away date.

Justice doesn't like this merger at all...they would have approved it by now if they did. They more or less waved AA-TW through to the second window, handed them their burgers, and sent them on their way. The "Bush hasn't appointed the staff yet" argument put out by UA isn't credible. They're filibustering, and UA is waiting for the walk-away date.


Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Morgan Stanley's View On The UA- US Merger posted Wed Jun 27 2001 04:28:55 by United Airline
Stop The UA/US Merger! posted Thu May 17 2001 14:47:18 by A330_DTW
Will The UA-US Merger Go Through? posted Tue Apr 3 2001 11:01:03 by United Airline
MOre Butter For The UA/US Merger posted Mon Feb 26 2001 00:35:19 by Exusair
Poll - What Do You Think Of The UA/US Merger posted Wed May 24 2000 21:06:09 by DeltAirlines
How Does The HP/US Merger Effect The UA Codeshare? posted Wed Sep 28 2005 00:08:47 by Gilesdavies
Q 400 And ATR 72 Why Not More Orders In The US? posted Sat Apr 22 2006 22:15:15 by Cumulonimbus
Why Does Zig-zagging Across The US Cost Cheaper? posted Mon Oct 31 2005 00:01:16 by TG990
Regarding The UA/US Fleet After The Merger. posted Wed Dec 27 2000 22:32:31 by SQA340
How Much Subcontracting Does Airbus Do In The US? posted Thu Jul 6 2000 15:22:29 by F4N