Sxmarbury33 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 447 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (14 years 9 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3036 times:
I know there are approaches like this that exsist but wouldnt wake turbulence be a problem espesially at St martens. Yea this one does look weird it dosnt look like the aircraft is going to clear the fence if it keeps decending.
Delta717 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 457 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (14 years 9 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2910 times:
This picture cannot be fake. Marlo Plate wouldn't put a fake on A.net. You guys need to visit the Photography forum before you judge someone's work! If you look, you can see the fumes from the exhaust and people are getting out of their cars to look. It is definetly NOT a fake.
EGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 31
Reply 14, posted (14 years 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2616 times:
That photo is NOT fake, the flaps are fully deployed, on an A320 they are not huge (don't have to be). I'd say the aircraft was behind the Truck, a telephoto or zoom lense is probably the reason why its so hard to judge.
Widebody From Ireland, joined Aug 2000, 1152 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (14 years 9 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2532 times:
Not to stir a fuss, but looking at the root of the tail section.....see the shadows? This side of the tail isn't lit, however the lighting on the fuselage indicates the sun is coming from a point to the right of the picture...yet the airport fence causes no shadows.......I still think its real, but the shadows ain't agreeing with me......
Jean leloup From Canada, joined Apr 2001, 2116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 18, posted (14 years 9 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2525 times:
I'm quite certain the beach at SXM is still open, It is a very popular one with a couple hotels on it. They couldn't just close it, I would think. I've seen those places advertised in current travel catalogues, so i think it's still good.