shanxz From Singapore, joined Apr 2006, 243 posts, RR: 0 Posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 15563 times:
Mentioned in the latest ATWonline:
Quote: SAS Group President and CEO Mats Jansson told Dagens Nyheter that the company likely will be sold to another airline once it recovers financially. "My understanding is that, after this crisis is over, SAS will be part of a structural deal," he said, according to Reuters. "It is tough out there and there are obvious synergies and advantages to be had from being part of a bigger entity."
Two weeks ago the Swedish government said it intends to reduce its 21.4% share in the group (ATWOnline, Feb. 19), but right now Jansson said he is focused on completing the previously announced SEK5 billion ($695 million) rights issue. SAS said it plans to unveil the subscription price on April 6, with the subscription period scheduled for April 15-29. The board will propose a reverse split in order to reduce the number of shares following the issue. "First we have to get the capital injection from shareholders and then get the cash flow positive again so that SAS will be an interesting object again," Jansson said. "From 2011 we will begin to show positive figures on the bottom line."
So, who're the likely buyers?
1. Lufthansa - because of Star Alliance synergies, and just because they have big ambitions in the region
2. airBaltic - Although originally started by SAS, the airline is now a powerhouse in the Baltics
3. BA/KL/AF/IB - Would one of the other biggies make a go for it?
[Edited 2010-03-03 23:32:53]
Airlines are in the service business, not transport. Brand matters...
Navigator From Sweden, joined Jul 2001, 1209 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 15483 times:
This is a dream of SAS CEO since he obviously has no plan for the the future of SAS on it´s own feet. I think it is time for this CEO to step out and give the market what it wants from SAS or resign. Tough words, but I think he has to do better or else SAS will be history soon. You can not survive on cutbacks only, you also have to have a good businessplan!!!
Larshjort From Denmark, joined Dec 2007, 1478 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 15448 times:
Quoting shanxz (Thread starter): 1. Lufthansa - because of Star Alliance synergies, and just because they have big ambitions in the region
Lufthansa has already stated that they are not interested and I don't know why airBaltic would want to get their hands on SAS. If they get sold, it believe that it will either be to Airfrance-KLM or BA/Finnair
hjulicher From Liechtenstein, joined Feb 2005, 880 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 15251 times:
Don't rule out Lufthansa. Lufthansa does pretty well in the Nordic region, and if they can flow PAX from the nordic countries through FRA and MUC on the intercontinental legs, then it would do them well. I also think that there might be some unexpected interest from carriers like Aeroflot.
Aeroflot also has ambitions to expand and I think that this would be something that they would definitely consider. Now that the Russian government has forced them to take over several smaller bust Russian airlines, I don't know how many resources they will have. Just two years ago Aeroflot had 14 Long-haul jets. Soon they will have 24 if including the IL96, and in 8+ years time they will have 44. Where are all these planes going to fly?
What about FInnair taking over part of SAS? This would seriously help one-world, and it seems that One World is serious now about growing as they almost suffered a defection.
Treg From Estonia, joined Oct 2001, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 15076 times:
Quoting shanxz (Thread starter): 2. airBaltic - Although originally started by SAS, the airline is now a powerhouse in the Baltics
You must be kidding, right?
SAS sold BT to BTs CEO. If one can pinpoint the investors behind him, I would be happy. At the moment their business is extremely nontransparent. Even the news about possible profit or loss are contradictory.
Navigator From Sweden, joined Jul 2001, 1209 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 14991 times:
It is probably easier for an entrant or a possible buyer of SAS to start from scratch and get new planes and more motivated people rather than taking over those old planes and not so motivated staff. Give scandinavian aviation a new chance by starting all over again with a new airline. Those interested can of course apply for a position at the new airline. This new entrant could very well be a subsidiary of Lufthansa. But SAS has to go before this can be a reality. As long as SAS stays with subsidies from the governments of the scandinavian countries noone can make enough money in the scandinavian market except perhaps Norwegians. Let the passengers be the winners and start out with a new airline and forget old SAS...
ju068 From Vanuatu, joined Aug 2009, 2645 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 14880 times:
If Lufthansa is not interested in buying SAS then it's bad news for them. If SAS is bought by some thrid party other than a Star Alliance member (that is Lufty) and eventually switching alliance, could we see Lufthansa and Star getting Norwegian? I know they are a low cost carrier but isn't BMI as well?
Please correct me if I am wrong
Andaman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 14322 times:
Quoting hjulicher (Reply 4): What about FInnair taking over part of SAS? This would seriously help one-world, and it seems that One World is serious now about growing as they almost suffered a defection.
A couple of years ago AY's former CEO said they could be interested in SAS's long haul operations, but I don't believe they would be able to make moves like that in the near future, without some bigger partner(s).
Quoting Larshjort (Reply 2): it believe that it will either be to Airfrance-KLM or BA/finnair
Perhaps BA/IB/AY + SK in some form could be the answer, competing against AF/KL and the LH group?
MotorHussy From New Zealand, joined Mar 2000, 3212 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 14206 times:
Aside from all this speculation of potential ownership, is SK a good airline?
What would be on offer for sale? Do they have a strong following and loyal clientele? Do they have a product that's right for their market? Is their route network right, frequencies etc? Do they have the right fleet?
I've always believed SK to be a Blue Chip airline, what's gone so horribly wrong and can it be remedied?
SKAirbus From Norway, joined Oct 2007, 1739 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 13410 times:
I doubt that Lufthansa will be able to buy SAS even if they wanted to.
SAS is a large airline and if Lufthansa purchased them, the European Union would probably step in to block the deal as they would have an unfair share of the market with Swiss, Austrian, Brussels Airlines and the various regional airlines.
One airline that seems to punch below its belt in Europe is British Airways. When/if they emerge from their troubles they may be interested in buying into a big stake of the European market by way of purchasing SAS or part of SAS.
AF/KL could also be interested but could stumble across the same problems as Lufthansa would. I.e. EU competition laws.
Someone83 From Norway, joined Sep 2006, 3401 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 13335 times:
Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 15): I doubt that Lufthansa will be able to buy SAS even if they wanted to.
SAS is a large airline and if Lufthansa purchased them, the European Union would probably step in to block the deal as they would have an unfair share of the market with Swiss, Austrian, Brussels Airlines and the various regional airlines
EU would easily approve it as it wouldn't change the competitive landscape. FYI SAS and LH already cooperate closely. Not only in Star Alliance, but thay have a JV and revenue sharing between Germany and Scandinavia
Mortyman From Norway, joined Aug 2006, 3954 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 11292 times:
I guess Norwegian won't be able to buy SAS ?
Another option that has been mentioned in Norwegian media is that one of the governments buys out the other 2. Not the best solution, but better than being owned by 3 governments . So far the Norwegian government atleast has made it clear that it does not see this as an option.
Robbie86 From Sweden, joined May 2006, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 10839 times:
Quoting Mortyman (Reply 17): Another option that has been mentioned in Norwegian media is that one of the governments buys out the other 2. Not the best solution, but better than being owned by 3 governments . So far the Norwegian government atleast has made it clear that it does not see this as an option.
The Swedish government would like to sell their share of SAS and have told both Norway and Denmark that they will as soon as an appropriate buyer comes around.
B777LRF From Luxembourg, joined Nov 2008, 1367 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 10592 times:
No chance of Aeroflot or any other airline from a non-EU country buying SK - non-EU carriers are not allowed to hold a majority share of an EU airline. Well, they are, but then it won't be an EU airline anymore.
Back in 1993 then SAS CEO Janne Carlzon was talking about the near-immediate (ha ha) restructing of European airlines, resulting in mergers and only 5 remaining carriers. His slogan was "One of 5 in '95". Yup, I said to myself, and SAS will become LufthanSAS.
There are really only 2 options open to SAS: One is to allow it to go bankrupt and build a new airline from the ground up. The second is selling it to Lufty. There should, by all logic, be a third option available, namely restructuring the existing airline. But that would require boldness, vision and a businessplan built on the traditional Scandinavian values of quality, innovation and service.
Fact of the matter is, though, nobody at SAS seems capable of formulating or executing such a plan, instead they're consistenly striving to reducing the airline to the lowest common denominator, trying to sell at full-service prices and with full-service cost levels what is nothing but a low-cost product.
The hull is leaking, the engines are misfiring, the rats have fled - time to let the ship sink.
From receips and radials over straight pipes to big fans - been there, done that, got the hearing defects to prove
OryCdg From France, joined Jun 2009, 23 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 10124 times:
That could be difficult for the whole LH owned system, since all north and central Europe would ne ruled by one board. In terms of free competition, would be pretty hard to justify.
Perhaps, it could also be a problem for AF/KLM, but at a lower level. KLM would be the happiest with it, with their strong ties with Scandinavia.
But after several takeover, increase in Capital (AF with Alitalia for example), would any of these two groups be able to bring enough money ? I mean, the SAS group is made of three different airlines, and even in some troubles, the buyer should spend quite a lot of money...
affirmative From France, joined Jul 2009, 352 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9974 times:
This is a game of not who is the biggest but about who will likely profit the most from a takeover..
Looking at it I think that the most likely "buyers" (I'm not sure one can talk about buyers since there's really nothing substantial to buy.) is LH and, I never thought I'd say this, Norwegian.
Norwegian is making a killing, literally.. Maybe not enough to buy SK just like that. But compare it to Spyker Cars takeover of SAAB, where a significantly smaller company bought a big car manufacturer. I'd say is possible. Likely? Who knows.. But Norwegian has a viable business model, just what SK lacks, and they might just be able to clean up SK and make it profitable again. They have stated quite recently that they would like to expand with longhaul..
Lufthansa stated a while ago that they were "not interested at the moment".. These things can change, and will.. I think LH is the most viable candidate for a takeover of SK. It's fairly easy to integrate into LH as is. SK and LH has had cooperations for quite some time now so they do understand each other. There are some hurdles though, like the EU antitrust and such.. That can prove to unsurmountable..
AY - Very unlikely.. They are on their needs after the slump..
AF/KL - They might be a tiny bit interested. But they difference in culture between SK and AF/KL would crash the deal. That I am sure of.
BA - This is not totally unlikely. With SK under their belt and cooperation with AY this could actually work. Moneywise I'm not sure they could handle it. Culture wise I would say the scandinavians and the Brits work better together than the Scandinavians and the South europeans.. It would also be a kick in LHs a**..
Disclaimer: I have no substatiated info that I build this upon, it's just my own opinion. Like it or not.
Qazar From Canada, joined May 2006, 333 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (4 years 7 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 9252 times:
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF LUFTHANSA....!!!!!
SWISS had 1 foot inside OneWorld when LH miraculously convinced it to switch alliegence.
BMI: Everyone said the deal wouldn't happen when the feud started between LH and SMB, but somehow Lufthansa renegotiated their option price and brought the loss making airline at a discount versus what everyone thought it would pay for it.
AUSTRIAN: The deal was in the coffin and the nails were already hammered in when the EU refused the deal on anti-competitive basis, but somehow today Austrian is part of the LH group...
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF LUFTHANSA....!!!!
Lufthansa never said they were not interested in buying SAS... They said they were not interested in buying SAS.... NOW!... And "Now" was when SAS owned Spanair, 20% of BMI, Air Baltic, and Air Greenland.... "Now" was when SAS was 4 different companies (SAS Scandinavian, SAS Danmark, SAS Sverige, and SAS Norge/Braathens).... And SAS has been doing a lot of clean-up ever since "Now". They sold their ownerships in all other companies - hence concentrating on their core activities; and they have recentered the company into 1 entity - hence reducing costs.
SAS's biggest problem at the moment are the Unions and their terrible fleet strategy with Boeing, Airbus, and McDonnell Douglas narrowbodies in their fleet.
I assure you, that LH will not turn its back on Norway, Sweden and Danmark as markets for them. The disposable income (required for air travel) available in these 3 countries is quite respectable. This is also not the first time we see LH downplay its willingness to buy an airline in an attempt to keep its stockprice down... Remember, if they wish to place a bid on SAS, the price per share will have to be based on the performance of the stock over the past X period.... Speculations that SAS may be bought by LH will definitly put an upward pressure on the stock - and that is not something Lufthansa is entertained by!
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF LUFTHANSA......!!!!