Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Future Of Low-cost Airlines In Europe  
User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 11
Posted (15 years 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 5620 times:

Ryanair starts new hub in Bruxelles south,Easyjet will improve its scheduled,Go and Buzz think about some new hubs,and in South Europe (Spain and Italy) no low cost flying on very profitable domestic routes.So do u think that in the future some low cost will start to operate in south Europe?? And do you think is it right call some airport with the namr of a important town far more than 50km (I mean Hahn with Frankfurt,Charleroy with Bruxelles,Nykoping with Stockholm,Torp with Oslo,Treviso with Venice,and so on..)??
But the future it's low cost airlines??

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 5596 times:

Interesting question.

I am an avid fan of no-frills airlines-I think they are the best thing since sliced bread!-especially since I live fairly close to Stansted!

Whether they will survive is a question I can't answer-I expect it depends what the break-even load factors are for those airlines, and by how much companies such as Ryanair, are able to surpass those break-even load factors (maximising the difference between acheived and break-even load factors).

Their continued success might also depend on their ability to sustain extremely low overheads-by contracting out all but essential activities to third parties-although there have been some questions raised as to the safety implications (if any) of contracting out the maintenance checks/catering etc. etc.

I suppose one advantage of their lower fares is that almost all of us will be able to afford to fly with no-frills airlines, even during hard times-fuel prices & taxes must be a pain for them though.

Has Buzz actually made a profit yet?

My 0.01p!

Yes, I do think that in some cases, Ryanair claim they fly into "Stockholm" or "Frankfurt", when in actual fact they fly into other cities.

Perhaps they should advertise the fact that they fly to "Hahn"-(Only 50k's from Frankfurt! Big grin ). But then their ads might not catch the eye of the newspaper reader.


User currently offlineF.pier From Italy, joined Aug 2000, 1531 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 5588 times:

I think that calling an airport with the name of an important town which is far from the airport is not a specific feature of low cost airlines because here in Italy for example we call Milano Malpensa (MXP) an intercontinental airport quite far from Milan and really close to Varese, and Milano Orio is an airport close to Bergamo.
I think that low-cost airlines can have a very profitable future because I realize that a lot of people now fly on their planes. If you consider that all their flights aren't long, I can accept not to have free meals or beverages and the seat assignation. It's not a problem and flight are enjoyable.
I've flown on Ryanair 738s and I can only say that they're really kool!!!!!

User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 5576 times:

Yes, I forgot to add that in some cases, airports that "frills" airlines fly into, can be quite a ride away from the city.

I had heard that many airlines complained about having been forced to move to MXP.

Also, is not the new airport in Sepang, quite a bit further out from downtown KL than the old Subang?

All of the majors with services to Buenos Aires serve Ezeiza, which is also quite a while away from downtown Bs.As.


User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 5574 times:

Ryanair have certainly led the way with low cost flights within Europe, it doesnt matter that they are using 3rd level airports miles from the named city as they supply a direct bus service directly into these cities.

Flying with them to BVA and getting from there to the center of Paris is easy and a lot less stressful than using CDG.

It will however be interesting to watch their future now that they have to pay for new aircraft rather than old 737-200's.

User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (15 years 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 5571 times:

Yes u r right,but the transpot sistem u can find in MXP,EZE,Sepang or Gardermoen it's more efficent than in Hahn,Torp or Treviso,where there only few bus service each day and taxi don't exist or are too expensive.

User currently offlineTWAneedsNOhelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (15 years 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5567 times:

Well I think Jean-Luc (nom de plas?) will agree with me, but some are certainly doing better than others. My money is on Ryanair and easyJet. Ryanair, despite their loudmouth chief, is a well run, low cost carrier with a bright future. easyJet also, and Stelios is developing strong brand identity. Others are now so so.

Neither Go nor Buzz I believe are big money makers and Virgin Express' Ireland subsidiary was liquidated. Debonair didn't make it and EuroBelgian Airlines, now Virgin Express, is still struggling to get on fine footing. I think Ryanair's new hub will certainly hurt them, however if Sabena continues to sink, they may cancel their codeshare agreement with the British owned low cost carrier.

Others? Eurofly? No clue what their story is.

Deutsche BA? Small mainly German network for this BA subsidiary and US Airways codeshare partner.

Alpi Eagles in Italy appears promising, but also maintains an exclusively domestic network.

Volare has a beautiful livery. Thats all I know of them.

AOM/Air Liberte, neither airline deserves to be in business, both are basket cases.

Spanair and Air Europa are steaming along, now that AE will not merge with IB. Spanair, with a leased Lauda bird is now starting long haul flights. Love those 717s for subsidiary AeBol though.

Aegean and Cronus are certainly giving Olympic a real haedache, although OA is somewhat of a basketcase itself.


User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (15 years 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 5547 times:

To TWAneedNOhelp,

Eurofly it's a italian charter airlines owned by AZ and operated 3 B767/300er, 5 MDD-83 and will recive during this month and june 5 A320/200.

Volare owned by Volare Group (that including Air Europe Italy) is mostly a charter airlines even if they operated some domestic scheduled (but with a regular airline service and fare,they use also some business seat on domestic routes where AZ operated only Y) and the fleet of Volare Group are: 2 B777/200er, 4 B767/300er, 2 A321/200 and 17 A320/200 (the 19 airbus planes are operated by Volare 8D and the Boeing planes by Air Europe PE)

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Future Of Non London Tranatlantics In The Uk posted Sat Apr 22 2006 01:41:11 by Ba757gla
Low Cost Carriers In Europe. posted Sun Jan 8 2006 08:26:37 by HPA320
The Future Of LTU German Airlines.. posted Tue Dec 27 2005 08:00:13 by Beaucaire
Low Cost Airlines In NE Asia, Flying International posted Mon Oct 10 2005 10:10:08 by Manni
Congrats EasyJet, Largest Low Cost Fleet In Europe posted Fri Apr 15 2005 00:46:40 by Squirrel83
Low Cost Airlines In Latin America posted Tue Mar 16 2004 16:08:21 by ACES320
Low Cost Overcapacity In Europe? posted Thu Jan 29 2004 11:46:04 by BestWestern
Low Cost Carriers In Europe posted Mon Jan 5 2004 19:03:52 by G-KIRAN
First Low Cost Carrier In Europe posted Sun Nov 16 2003 20:51:29 by MEA321
Low Cost Carriers In Europe posted Tue Jun 24 2003 15:33:15 by JetTrader