Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rolls Royce Engines For A330/340  
User currently offlineAirmale From Botswana, joined Sep 2004, 358 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 873 times:

Why couldnt the A330/340 use the same RR engine design as on the 744 and 767(BA only), why do they get different looking engines, the ones powering the 744 are so beautiful Smile


.....up there with the best!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLBA From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 494 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 851 times:

Correct me if I'm wrong anyone but don't the 767 and 747 use RB211 engines and the Airbus RR Trents. The RR Trent is the next generation of RR engines and has been designed to allow outputs of over 100,000 lbs thrust whilst also reducing noise and fuel consumption. Whilst the RB211 may look beautiful technology and demands from customers move on - the Trent is the future for RR.

User currently offlineTristar2000 From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 274 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 818 times:

Yes, those 767s and 744s are equipped with RB-211 engines, providing around 58 000-60 000 pounds of thrust.

As for the Trent 500 on the new A340-500 and A340-600, it can deliver around 56 000 pounds, and then the Trent 700 on A330s can provide around 72 000 pounds of thrust.

Then, you have the bigger Trent 800 for the 777s. For the A380, I believe that the Trent 900 will be more powerful than the Trent 700, but less than the 800, but then again correct me if I'm wrong.

Anyhow, the Trent family is the newer family of RR engines. The RB 211 has been around since the L-1011, it's a good engine, but the design is getting old, and like LBA said, the Trents are more fuel efficient and also quieter.

Regards,
Steven

User currently offlineBombayhog From United States of America, joined May 2001, 554 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 800 times:

The Trents look largely the same as the RB-211s. They both look great, in my opinion.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 7560 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 days ago) and read 790 times:

Actually, there's a lot of commonality between the RB.211 and the Trent engines.

Remember, the Trent 700 was originally named RB.211-700 before Rolls-Royce decided to apply a different name designation. I believe the engine cores of later RB.211-524 engines and the Trent series of engines have many common parts.

User currently offlineGOT From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 1912 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 775 times:

The Trent is just a new generation. There are reasons that airlines don't buy new turbojets, because there are newer and more fuel efficient alternatives.

GOT


Just like birdwatching - without having to be so damned quiet!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
767-200 With Rolls-Royce Engines posted Thu Sep 18 2003 21:56:49 by BAJMowiec
A Tu-154M With Rolls-Royce Engines? posted Sun Sep 8 2002 14:11:19 by Aviastar
Half Painted Rolls Royce Engines posted Mon Dec 3 2001 12:48:12 by Airmale
Rolls Royce Engines Axe 3,000 Staff posted Sun Oct 14 2001 19:43:24 by 9v-spk
Rolls-Royce Engines On BA 777er's? posted Wed Aug 15 2001 21:46:14 by US A333 PIT
New Interior For A330/340? posted Sun May 6 2001 23:29:18 by Hkg_clk
Rolls Royce Engines Not Preferred On 747s? posted Fri May 4 2001 00:39:14 by Airmale
Rolls-Royce Engines On The MD-11 posted Fri Sep 29 2000 10:40:18 by GUNDU
Rolls-Royce Trent Engines Chosen For Singapore A3X posted Sun Oct 15 2000 18:52:25 by Delta777-XXX
Production Rates For A32X, A330/340 And A380? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 16:23:02 by WINGS