Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MKE Sets Another Record For Monthly Traffic  
User currently offlinejreuschl From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 550 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1876 times:

http://www.jsonline.com/business/92779694.html

The month's total of 896,598 passengers was an increase of 41.5% over 633,763 passengers in March 2009. The total eclipses the previous high month, July 2008, which saw 821,610 passengers during the peak summer travel season.

The number of passengers for the first quarter of 2010 is a quarterly record at 2,262,597, a 39.6% increase over the year-earlier period.

By comparison, nationwide passenger count increased just 1.4% in March, said Barry Bateman, Mitchell International director.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineknope2001 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2998 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1767 times:

Once again, Milwaukee is serving more passenges than airports like Memphis, Kansas City, Cincinnati, and Oakland.

Unthinkable a couple of years ago.

Two keys things will make or break this trend for MKE

1. Milwaukee needs to continue to gain passengers from northern Chicago.

While there's a fair amount of local-market traffic stimulation...both people flying more based on low fares and an improved retention of the natural MKE market (some of which uses ORD)...the real jackpot comes from Lake and McHenry counties in Illinois. Well over a million people in those heavily suburban counties who overwhelmingly use ORD but could just as easily use MKE.


2. The connecting traffic AirTran and Midwest/Frontier are running through MKE need to be breakeven or marginal profitable.

A significant amount of the growth at MKE has come from running more connections through MKE. Many of those are price-based passengers who in past years might have connected in Pittsburgh or Cincinnati or St Louis. Speaking in general terms of course, US, DL and AA didn't find that traffic flow profitable enough to sustain those hubs. AirTran and Frontier's costs are on average solidly below US, DL and AA. Low enough to serve a lot of this traffic flow and break even or make money? We'll see.

I'm sure that some decisions made regarding MKE are sometimes influenced by testosterone and a game of chicken politely called "long term network strategy". But if costs are low enough and RASM is high enough to not take a bath on connecting traffic, then *maybe* what's going on is actually sustainable. The stronger item #1 is, the better shot that this has.


User currently offlineMKENut From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 699 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (4 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

I think a lot of the bleed to ORD and MDW from Wisconsin has slowed tremendously. On top of that, a bonus in the form of some people from Illinois willing to make the trek North to MKE.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Another Month And Another Record For FLL posted Sat Sep 29 2007 03:11:49 by Njdevilsin03
Boeing Sets World Record For Everett Mural posted Wed Mar 29 2006 19:55:36 by DIA
Erie Airport - ERI - Sets Another Record posted Tue Jan 10 2006 22:37:36 by KarlB737
QF Sets Another Record posted Tue Feb 17 2004 12:09:27 by Nwfltattendant
An225 Sets Another World Record posted Wed Aug 19 2009 05:39:27 by Cc2314
Another Record Month For AirTran posted Tue Apr 1 2003 20:17:49 by Travatl
Excellent March For MIA Traffic posted Mon May 3 2010 17:45:36 by mah4546
Another Achievement For DBQ posted Fri Sep 25 2009 15:56:05 by DBQ
Airlines' Improving Record For Season: WSJ posted Thu Sep 10 2009 09:14:41 by CAL764
Tame Ecuador: Another Victory For Eurowhite posted Wed Sep 2 2009 06:01:08 by Birdwatching