Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Do You Infants Should Have To Buy There Own Seats?  
User currently offlineBoeing 747-311 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 795 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 19 hours ago) and read 2297 times:

Do u think that infants should buy there own seats? Or sit on there parents lap? I had an experience where i was sitting next to a lady and her son, and the kid was all over me on the flight! I think they should buy there own seats but what do u think?

Have a good day,

boeing 747-311

Come fly with US
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAirbus380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 19 hours ago) and read 2275 times:

I agree...I sat next to one in FC on CO and it barfed on me...back in 1989.

User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2177 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (15 years 18 hours ago) and read 2269 times:

I totally agree.

The whole "Lap Infant" thing was allowed because the F.A.A. determined that if families were forced to purchase the extra seat, the cost would prevent them from flying - and that they would in turn travel by car, putting the entire family at risk on the highways.

HOWEVER...the cost of traveling by plane has fallen so low that this thinking is no longer valid.

Further, I simply do not understand the mentality of parents who wouldn't consider letting their two year old out of car seat when their driving down the road at 50 MPH, but don't think twice about letting the brat run all over the airplane when the seatbelt sign is on in the air, or when the aircraft is taxiing. Car seats make it easier for the parents, the passengers sitting around them, and the cabin crew. (Try explaining to a 25 year old mother sitting on the taxi-way at LaGuardia for two hours on a full airplane that her restless child MUST remain in her lap at all times.)

Buckle 'em up....save their lives.


User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (15 years 18 hours ago) and read 2264 times:

I think the lap thing is ok. I mean 500 bucks per seat to europe in the off season is still a lot for many families. The airline would have to sell the seat at normal fare inorder to make a profit so there is no benifit for them either. so basicaly it is bad for both the fam. and the airline.

User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7907 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (15 years 18 hours ago) and read 2265 times:

I completely agree with Travis here.

The infant's safety and everyone else's comfort is at risk by having children in your lap. They should be properly secured in an infant car seat, like you have to in an automobile. Furthermore airlines should have fares for infants travelling with parents... they don't eat the $3.50 the airline spent on food. The airlines should simply do it as a courtesy to the parents, which would hopefully ensure brand loyalty, and mostly see it as being safer.

Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (15 years 18 hours ago) and read 2263 times:

TRhat can however leave the airlines out of a lot of money. Swissair already does this. All childeren under 2 travel at 10% the parents fare and childeren up to 12 are at 70% the parents fare. Also I think more airlines should start youth fares. ie. under 26

User currently offlineTexStud323 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (15 years 18 hours ago) and read 2264 times:

ANYTHING if it will keep them quiet!!!

but to answer this in real text... I firmly believe that parents traveling with infants SHOULD be required to purchase a ticket/seat for him/her. Every time those parents board an aircraft with their infant as a lap child they gamble with that innocent childs life!!! One healthy airpocket and "Jr." is a projectile... but look at all the money they saved??????

Who cares if this response is popular or not, it's fact and it bears some serious consideration by all traveling parents.

User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2177 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (15 years 17 hours ago) and read 2259 times:

TEX - From your mouth to the idiot-parents' ears.

User currently offlineOverlord From Portugal, joined Jul 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (15 years 17 hours ago) and read 2257 times:

If anyone knows of an infant that can buy their own seats, I want to adopt them: they obviously have more money than me. Thank you.

User currently offlineTrickijedi From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3266 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (15 years 17 hours ago) and read 2253 times:

I remember having my own seat when I was an infant. It was nice.

Its better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than be in the air wishing you were on the ground. Fly safe!
User currently offlineBoeing 747-311 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 795 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (15 years 16 hours ago) and read 2244 times:

thanks for the responses!

Come fly with US
User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (15 years 14 hours ago) and read 2242 times:

The old system of discounts for infants and children (10% of the adult fare for under 2; 50 - 66% for 2-12) is now well outdated, given the already incredibly low fares available. I think it should be a fixed price per seat - and whether that seat is occupied by a 2 month old; a 7 year old; an 18 year old or a 90 year old should make no difference - it pretty much costs the airlines the same to fly all of those categories.

User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (15 years 14 hours ago) and read 2241 times:

Ceilidh - Is Caledonian Wings gonna adopt that strategy?

User currently offlineHighflyer16 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 117 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (15 years 14 hours ago) and read 2237 times:

As a parent with several kids, I can tell you that paying an extra $400-$500 does still make a difference, especially when Mom has to travel someplace with a breast-feeding baby, you are talking about doubling the cost of my flying her back east.

As to the safety thing with carseats, plane crashes are not like car crashes. You really don't expect to survive a plane crash, and more people die from the fire and smoke than the impact in most accidents. However, ironically, one child survived a Northwest crash in Detroit in 1985 when nobody else did: an infant named Cecelia Cechan who was nestled in her mother's arms, which saved her from the flames on that fiery jet.

Child restraints help more of course with the turbulence, but again turbulence is not like an impact. How many kids do you know of that have been killed or seriously injured by airplane turbulence? If anyone can produce evidence that this is a common occurence, then I'd like to see it, it would probably change my way of thinking.

For now, until I either win the lottery and have nothing better to do with my money, or until they pass another silly law, "Junior" gets to sit on Mommy's lap!

User currently offlineChepos From Puerto Rico, joined Dec 2000, 6383 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (15 years 13 hours ago) and read 2232 times:

Actually a couple of years ago a flight coming into SJU from MIA (AA) suffered severe turbulence. An infant travelling in the arms of his mother got severely injured along a couple of other pax. I would really like to give you the exact date and everything but hey it was a couple of years back.
Puerto Rico

Fly the Flag!!!!
User currently offlineKRP From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (15 years 12 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

Highflyer 16:

Why can Jn not sit on daddys lap???

User currently offlineKatekebo From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 712 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (15 years 11 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

Just few of comments from a frequent flier with two small children:

1.- If a child (or infant) disturbs fellow passangers or the crew, the problem are the parents, not the child. Parents who don't know how to entertain and control their children when travelling should not fly (or have children at all). I have made many (20+) intercontinental flights with my children since they were 3 months old (they are 6 and 3 years old now) and I never had a problem. You just need to learn to play with your children and have enough patience to keep them busy for the entire length of the journey.

2.- Infants should travel in their own seat. This is for safety reasons, but also for your own comfort and consideration to other fellow passengers.

3.- Yes, an extra seat for an infant costs money. Having children always costs a lot of money. If you like to travel and do not want to pay for an extra seat for your infant, you should take this into account before having children.

Being a parent is very easy. Being a RESPONSIBLE parent is not.

User currently offlineOverlord From Portugal, joined Jul 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (15 years 9 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

And the moral of the story according to Katekebo: Don't have children if you don't have the $$ to let them fly in their own seat. Like that even crosses your mind when having children. Good grief.

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 17
Reply 18, posted (15 years 8 hours ago) and read 2219 times:

He more likely means: parents take care of your children and don't let them become a burden on your fellow pax or the crew.

When I see parents with (especially small) children in the waiting area for my flight I already count on several hours of wailing children jumping up and down, annoying everyone.
Often it does not happen, but some parents either don't care or don't dare to discipline their children (or better yet, prevent them from needing to be disciplined).
I learned at an early age to leave others alone and not to shout in enclosed spaces. Why can't today's parents do the same?

I wish I were flying
User currently offlineOverlord From Portugal, joined Jul 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (15 years 8 hours ago) and read 2218 times:

Imagine that: children that make noise. What IS the world coming to. The problem oftentimes isn't the children or their parents: it's the grown-ups acting like babies becasue a child is being a child. Maybe there should be a special section where famalies can get away from the likes of you guys.

User currently offlineTravatl From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2177 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (15 years 5 hours ago) and read 2212 times:

Highflyer16 -

The young girl from the Northwest accident in Detroit was in fact 5 years old, and not "cradled in her mothers arms" but rather occupying her own seat. She was traveling with her mother one row ahead of her father and 8 year old brother. All of whom were killed.

Just two and a half years ago an American Airlines MD80 over Colorado encountered turbulence sending a lap child to ICU with skull fractures.

A lap child on a United 747 over the Pacific during turbulence suffered a broken arm.

I personally have seen numerous nose bleeds and bruises on kids (most because their parents let them run around the aisle during taxi).

On the United DC10 that crashed in Sioux City, only ONE of the lap children survived. Why? Because he was thrown into an overhead compart during the aircraft roll, somewhat cushioned from the impact. A fluke - that still resulted in brain damage.. The video of the United flight attendant in an interview later who spoke of having to face the mothers, who surivived, after the accident is heart wrenching. She now champions the fight for NO MORE LAP CHILDREN.

I somehow think that should you survive a plane crash (80% are survivable, it's the post-crash fire that kills, especially those mothers searching for their children who have been flung through the cabin), the fact that you thought you "would all die" would be little consolation.

I implore you to buckle them up, and SAVE THEIR LIVES.


User currently offlineWestern737 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 489 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (15 years 4 hours ago) and read 2203 times:

Okay, I am speaking of opposite to infant, I am wondering if those big or heavy people like 400+ lbs that they would need to take two seats as a seat. Do they still purchase a ticket for one seat or two seats?

I have seen some extra-overweight people taking two seats and am wondering about that.

Sorry if I throw an off-point topic.

User currently offlineN863DA From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 48 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (14 years 12 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2195 times:

Picture it.

Sioux City, Iowa. July 19th, 1989.

Six infants are informed by the cabin crew of a striken United Airlines DC-10-10 en-route from Denver to Chicago to place their infants on the floor of the cabin in preparation for the crash landing about to take place.

The Cabin crew are not taking any initiative of their own - in fact, quite the contrary. They are following national policy on infants in crash landings, and going against their instincts, if anything.

The children are placed on the floor, and, as they say, the crash is a spectacular 250-ton cartwheel down two miles of concrete.

Five out of those six infants die from trauma experienced while on the floor of the cabin, (and then the ceiling, walls and overhead bins) and one survives -because he flew into an open overhead-bin which happened to have a few leather jackets in it, cushioning the impact of him hitting them. The bin then closed, protecting (relatively speaking) the child from the carnage outside.

Five out of six children die. Had they had their own seats, (in child seats) would this death record have been recorded? Perhaps. But perhaps not. They would have been secured into their seats. They would most certainly have been injured. BUT THEY WOULD HAVE SURVIVED.

Imagine driving at 210+mph on a freeway, sitting happily on the floor, when the car goes from 210mph to 0 in roughly four seconds. Where are you? Heaven. But your body is somewhere between here and the next exit.

I realize economics plays a factor, but which would you rather have - your kid live, or you save a few hundred bucks?

Why is there even a need for a debate on this issue?


N 8 6 3 D A

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Anyone Knwo How To Buy Used Airplane Seats? posted Fri Sep 12 2003 23:12:35 by Noah008
Do U Think Jetblue Should Move To LAX? posted Wed Jan 29 2003 07:10:32 by AsianaAirlines
Do DL/CO/NW Have To Merge? posted Wed Feb 7 2001 07:00:50 by Nwa747-400
Do You Have To Be Good-looking To Become A FA? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 18:00:46 by B777A340Fan
How Tall Do You Have To Be To Be A Pilot? posted Wed Mar 22 2006 22:57:19 by AAden
Want To Buy AM Or MX? You Can Do It Now! posted Wed Jul 6 2005 23:02:47 by SFOMEX
Do You Have To Pay Every Time You Change Itinerary posted Fri Mar 25 2005 20:09:56 by LX23
Tickets: How Do You Buy Yours? Best Time To Buy? posted Wed Oct 1 2003 17:35:34 by ILoveORD
What Airline Job Do You Want To Have? posted Sun Nov 25 2001 20:40:47 by DeltaBoy777
Do You Realy Have To Say Airbus <b>A</b>320? posted Tue Jul 17 2001 22:17:54 by SAS_A330-300