Arsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 21 Posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3392 times:
Why are there no US carriers in the middles east. As far as i know, on Continental serves Tel aviv and cairo and TWA serves cairo i think (correct me if i'm wrong). But what about places like Bahrain, Riyadh, Dubai, possibly Kuwait aswell. Why doesn't someone like UA, AA or delta serve these cities through a connection in europe like Paris or Frankfurt maybe?
Mah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31750 posts, RR: 73 Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3188 times:
TWA still flies to Cairo and Riyadah (JFK-CAI-RUH). Delta flies to Tel Aviv and this summer to Cairo and Dubai. Continental flies to Tel Aviv and maybe Cairo. American does not fly to the Middle East but codeshares with Gulf Air on MIA-LHR-BAH (MIA-LHR operated by AA, LHR-BAH buy Gulf).
Twaneedsnohelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3141 times:
I don't believe CO has any service to CAI, but does have 777 service to Israel. Delta began its MD11 Israel service today, and will add the NY to Cairo to Dubai route soon. American will acquire TW's NY to Cairo to Riyadh route in the coming years.
American_4275 From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1076 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 3118 times:
I found that comment of yours extremely offensive and I think you should have more common sense than that. It's also totally false and personally I don't appreciate the fact that you're pulling things out of no where just because you've seen too many movies. My family happens to be from the Middle East and would never touch a bomb or gun. We're not all terrorists. Next time mind your words.
Ishky15 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 717 posts, RR: 13 Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 3104 times:
American will axe TWA's service to Tel Aviv when they acquire the miserable airline, and Cairo might be on the chopping block as well. Delta begins daily MD-11 service from New York to Tel Aviv and Cairo, continuing on to Dubai. Continental used to fly double daily 777 service to TLV but dropped the early evening flight from EWR. That flight will most likely reappear when market conditions warrant. They are also looking very closely at services to Cairo, and 767-400ER service would not be a surprise over the next five years.
Mah4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31750 posts, RR: 73 Reply 13, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3090 times:
Ishky, currently, American Airlines has no plans to axe JFK-CAI-RUH. In fact, they realsed a press realease stating that they will not discontinue the popular flight handled by TW. Also, we forgot to mention that DL flies JFK-IST daily, though, technically, Istanbul is more Europe than the Middle East. AA codeshares with Turkish on MIA-IST, JFK-IST, and ORD-IST (14 flights a week between TK's three US destinations; 7x JFK, and 7x ORD/MIA depending on season (MIA is 3x during winter, 2x during summer)). As for new Middle Eastern routes, well, there isn't much. The biggest destination is TLV, and that market is pretty well served. Problem is, all the service is from JFK*! Why? How about AA starting thrice-weekly 777-200 service on MIA-TLV or ORD-TLV? They would have the market practically to themselves (though LY flies both MIA-TLV and ORD-TLV, but both via JFK), and they have the connections. Miami has America's second largest Jewish population and America's wealthiest Jewish population as well, plus, AA has no presence what so ever in Isreal (they had plans, what happened?). At ORD, AA would have strong connecting and O&D traffic, especially connecting traffic from the West. At MIA, the flight could practically survive on O&D alone, but there are also the connections it could get from Buenos Aires, with one of the world's largest Jewish populations (and there is still no non-stop service between EZE and TLV, nor any other Latin city, if I'm not mistaken). I think DL has some big plans for the Middle East if everything works with JFK-TLV and JFK-CAI-DXB. But why the MD11? I love the MD11, but a 772 would be better fit.
Watewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 2 Reply 14, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3084 times:
Blink182 may have worded it a little bit too harshly, but he does make a valid point. US State Department forbids American carriers from flying into many Middle East nations due to uncertainty of security standards in the region. Don't take it the wrong way- no one's saying that all Arabs are terrorists.
Consider this warning from US State Department on travel to Lebanon;
"American air carriers are prohibited from use of Beirut International Airport (BIA) due to continuing concern about airport and aircraft security arrangements." http://travel.state.gov/travel_warnings.html
Baec777 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1231 posts, RR: 2 Reply 15, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3082 times:
Continental, Delta & TWA are 3 only US carriers that flies to Israel... Not sure why no other countries not getting any US Carrier to fly there... ! I am wishing American, United, & NWA should fly to Israel, and other countries like Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, etc..
Hisham From Lebanon, joined Aug 1999, 701 posts, RR: 12 Reply 16, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3070 times:
Security at Beirut airport is as good as any place else. Actually, the extent of the security checks is really annoying. Only passengers can get to check-in area. They are checked before getting there. Then they are checked again before clearing customs. In both cases, they have very modern x-ray machines.
There hasn't been a single security incident for at least 10 years.
Sju-lax From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 17, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3052 times:
Imagine for a moment an American 777-200 landing at Beirut airport. The large AMERICAN titles, with the American flag and eagle on the tail would be an absolute joke. It would definetely not be a welcomed sight. I know its 2001, but the US is still seen as many county's nemisis. TWA and Pan Am would get away with flying to exotic, stereotypically terrorist-friendly regions like Algiers, Lebanon, Iran and the like. These airlines were global carriers and not seen as flag carriers. Today, American is seen as the flag carrier just because of what it looks like. People see the flag, the silver, the eagle and it represents everything United States. Some places just aren't ready for that yet.
R.I.P TWA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 18, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3033 times:
I would imagine that part of the problem is that more conservative Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, etc...do not allow women to wander around without covering many parts of their bodies. Women WILL be arrested on site if they are seen breaking one of these laws. Therefore US carriers probably would not want the added stress of having to train their FAs in Arab customs (or using only males, which would be agaisnt the law in the US) just so they won't be arrested. My mom, a TWA FA, is going to Cairo next week, and they don't usually get off the plane for the CAI-RUH segment. But if they get stuck there, the women have to wear veils upon leaving the hotel. Just not worth the aggravation I suppose. Plus, to be honest, most americans don't really see the Middle East as a vacation spot, and there are plenty of Middle Eastern carriers to handle the Business demand (TLV, CAI aside).
Pe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19022 posts, RR: 53 Reply 20, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3011 times:
A few years ago, GF used to operate from the Gulf (AUH, BAH and I believe DOH) to JFK via LCA and on particular flights continuing to IAH. All these flights were operated by the 340. Does anyone know if any such flights are to resume and if so is it likely that an American airline would operate the flights?
"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
Chepos From Puerto Rico, joined Dec 2000, 6097 posts, RR: 11 Reply 21, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3000 times:
R.I.P TWA I was talking to a TWA f/a that had gone on the CAI-RUH segment and in Cairo some women dont wear Hijaabs. She was allowed to to walk around the streets of Cairo Hijaab less and without a problem . She really liked Egypt and thought of it as a wonderfull country. Saudi Arabia is another story, that is strict and women are ordered to wear Hijaab and a great deal of them wear Burqa's . And going on to Kuwait , Kuwait is strict but women in Kuwait arent ordered to wear veil , I have a classmate that happens to be a girl and from Kuwait and she tells me that she didnt use a veil back in Kuwait, and that she really enjoyed living in Kuwait. Actually the Kuwait Airways f/a uniform isnt really conservative at all compared to those of SV or Iran Air.
Hisham From Lebanon, joined Aug 1999, 701 posts, RR: 12 Reply 22, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2997 times:
Sju-lax you're an ignorant idiot. I guess you're imagining crowds getting angry and running towards the aircraft with an American flag to destroy it, millions and millions of them. But if there is no flag they won't notice, right?
I'm not even going to try to prove you're wrong. Your imagination is much more powerful than my arguments.