Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA 752 At FSD For 3+ Days - Why?  
User currently offlinewestern727 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 727 posts, RR: 4
Posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2354 times:

Topic pretty much says it all. Anyone know why it's been there for 3-plus days, according to a buddy of mine who lives there? Thanks in advance.


Jack @ AUS
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineairbusaddict From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 415 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2251 times:

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/90911329.html#idc-container

That is why. According to Sioux Falls Media they had to fly in a replacement plane (it was a 757) and UA flew Mechanics in from Chicago to investigate what happened to the plane (all mentioned in the article).



Finally F9! FSD-DEN 7-4-2011
User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2368 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

UA 158 from SFO to ORD a 757-200 had engine problems and diverted to Sioux Falls on July 4.

Here is a great site to answer these types of questions:
http://www.avherald.com/

.



Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2368 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2217 times:

Quoting airbusaddict (Reply 1):
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/90911329.html#idc-container

That is why. According to Sioux Falls Media they had to fly in a replacement plane (it was a 757) and UA flew Mechanics in from Chicago to investigate what happened to the plane (all mentioned in the article).

I don't think that story is for the latest incident. The article is dated April 14, 2010. Coincidentially it is the same airline, same type of aircraft and same airport, just 3 months earlier.

The following link has the correct information:
http://www.avherald.com/

.



Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA 763 At OMA- Why? posted Tue Jul 6 2010 16:10:43 by FL787
More Reasons For New Air Service At FSD posted Wed Jun 4 2008 16:20:55 by Airbusaddict
Philipines A340 Parked For Days At YVR posted Tue May 27 2008 22:58:36 by TwinOtter4Ever
Why Were There Three UA Aircraft At SYD? posted Sun Apr 20 2008 16:32:54 by Nickofatlanta
Did UA Scare F9 Off With Mainline At FSD? posted Tue Jan 22 2008 12:04:23 by Airbusaddict
40 MIN Enough At LAX For AA-UA. posted Fri Dec 8 2006 05:44:05 by Boston92
UA Making Extra Reward Seats Avail For 2 Days posted Wed Nov 15 2006 04:25:25 by ATLAaron
Who Runs Term A At IAD For UA? posted Thu Aug 17 2006 19:32:42 by BDL2DCA
Why No UA Mainline At RDU? posted Tue Jun 14 2005 06:27:59 by Usairwys757
A Change At Indianapolis For UA! posted Sat Oct 9 2004 02:36:51 by KarlB737