Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Embraer Reengine/Replacement Decision By Year End  
User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5094 posts, RR: 48
Posted (5 years 9 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2585 times:

Looks like Embraer is debating between re-engining the Ejets, which could involve wing and landing gear modification, and an all new replacement. It is not clear if the replacement will be 4 abreast or 5 abreast platform.

Why not go for a light 6 abreast platform optimised for short haul market of upto 2,000nm stage length, with 135 and 165 seat single class capacities. This would enable EMB to bracket CSeries and enable it to take on A&B in the long run.

"We may have to raise the aircraft a little bit and [it] would require us to redesign the wing and maybe the gears, and this is one of the variables we have to analyse," he says. "Then, if we change the aircraft, the investment goes up so we have to be very certain about the market demand for the requirements. Today's it's not clear."

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMauriceB From Netherlands, joined Aug 2004, 2492 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (5 years 9 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2543 times:

How funny, i was turning on my computer, and was thinking about making a new topic about Embrear and KLM in the future.

I can imagine that a lot airlines are waiting to replace theire 70-seats planes because the current ones available aren't that much better than the older planes like the F-70.

For example, KLM replaced most of the Fokker F-100's with EMB-190's, but still got a very large F-70 fleet. Sure most F-70 are much younger than the most F-100's, but you would have expected they would replace them with EMB-170's, wich they didn't.

So i think a re-engined EMB-170 could give the last push they need to receive way more orders.. i could think of Austrian, KLM, Air France etc etc, but also airlines that now for example fly the Q400. When the re-engined plane won't be that much more fuel consuming than most turboprops, the + sides of jet-engines will win in the end.

User currently offlinebjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 4699 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (5 years 9 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2421 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Thread starter):
It is not clear if the replacement will be 4 abreast or 5 abreast platform.

IMHO, 2x2 seating is what makes the EJets family somewhat unique...5 abreast just amother airplane.

"I want to know the voice of God the rest is just details" --A. Einstein
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL To Ground All Dedicated Freighters By Year End posted Tue Apr 21 2009 05:02:49 by PHXtoDCAtoMSP
JAT "gets" Rothschild - Privatization By Year End posted Fri Sep 7 2007 20:33:22 by JoKeR
FI: Airbus Expects 200 A350 Orders By Year End posted Thu May 31 2007 13:01:39 by EI321
CO Likely To BOS Terminal A By Year's End posted Tue Apr 10 2007 11:59:46 by N801NW
A350 Decision By The End Of November posted Tue Nov 14 2006 16:39:30 by Thorben
BA To Order New Aircraft BY Year End. posted Thu Sep 28 2006 09:59:55 by WINGS
KSA To Award 2 Operator Licences By Year End posted Tue May 9 2006 20:25:43 by HiJazzey
Rumor: B6 To SXM By Year's End posted Thu Apr 13 2006 19:33:21 by TIA
MCO To See Bump In Jetblue Traffic By Year-end posted Tue Feb 28 2006 14:12:21 by Lowecur
Airbus Reiterates "200 A350 Orders By Year-end" posted Fri Nov 11 2005 16:48:15 by Joni