A319 Incident At Istanbul — Civil Aviation Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

A319 Incident At Istanbul

na From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 9614 posts, RR: 10
Posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 13798 times:

"the jet carries the name 'Guba', identifying it as serial number 2588, registered 4K-AZ04."

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-damaged-in-istanbul-incident.html

14 replies: All unread, jump to last

TK787 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4108 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 13198 times:

More pics here:
http://www.airkule.com/default.asp?page=haber&id=9427

Delta777Jet From Germany, joined Jun 2000, 1131 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 13140 times:

Looks like overspeed landing without flaps set.

Fly easyJet

airbuseric From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 4015 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 13051 times:

Seems like the runway that recently got a new asphalt layer. I think more problems occured in the past on this runway in IST?

"The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going"

TK787 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4108 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 12874 times:

Quoting airbuseric (Reply 3):

Correct. It has been somehow extended, more taxiways added, new surface but sound like:

Quoting Delta777Jet (Reply 2):
Looks like overspeed landing without flaps set.

No injuries, runway open now.

Spacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2739 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 12840 times:

Looks expensive! How much FOD do you think the engines sustained?

The last of the famous international playboys

7673mech From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 10750 times:

Quoting Delta777Jet (Reply 2):
Looks like overspeed landing without flaps set.

They could already have been sucked up to give ground crews access around the aircraft. It will be interesting to see what comes of this.

TK787 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4108 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 10285 times:

Here is a timelapse video, wonder if you could get any more info from it:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xef...zerbaycan-ucayy-pistten-cykty_news

Spacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2739 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 9226 times:

Was there perhaps hyraulic problems? The maingear doors are still open on the AvHerald article.

http://www.avherald.com/h?article=42f8835a&opt=6144

The last of the famous international playboys

flyingbird From Sweden, joined Mar 2005, 150 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 8499 times:

www.flightradar24.com logs show this:

600804 LTBA AHY075 2225 40.91039 28.68505 161 65 2010-08-12 09:35:57 J275

600804 LTBA AHY075 675 40.95498 28.7883 157 53 2010-08-12 09:37:57 J275

600804 LTBA AHY075 75 40.97151 28.82257 161 59 2010-08-12 09:38:47 J275

HEX RADAR CALLSIGN HEIGHT LON LAT SPEED DIRECTION TIME(CET) FLIGHT

PlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11134 posts, RR: 63
Reply 10, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 8241 times:

Quoting TK787 (Reply 7):
Here is a timelapse video, wonder if you could get any more info from it:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xef..._news

Is that the passengers getting off at the very end?

Glad it wasn't more serious.

Dan

7673mech From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 632 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7248 times:

Quoting 7673mech (Reply 6):
They could already have been sucked up to give ground crews access around the aircraft. It will be interesting to see what comes of this.

Interesting ... Avherald article talks of the flaps also being up, so maybe there is something to it. Landed too fast, tried to turn too fast and snapped nose gear.?

TrnsWrld From United States of America, joined May 1999, 763 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 6961 times:

Quoting Delta777Jet (Reply 2):
Looks like overspeed landing without flaps set.

Seriously????? come on how would you have any clue as to what happened here? Some of the comments on this site never cease to amaze me.

simpilot459 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 137 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 6352 times:

Quoting TrnsWrld (Reply 12):

Seriously????? come on how would you have any clue as to what happened here?

Well, photos showing an aircraft that has left skid marks behind it at the end of a runway with a collapsed nose gear in the dirt, and flaps being up seems to be a pretty good clue to me. Whether it is or is not the cause is up to the experts to determine, but I see nothing wrong with a little speculation by enthusiasts as long as people realize that they are just speculations.

Take off: Optional Landing: Mandatory

Delta777Jet From Germany, joined Jun 2000, 1131 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (2 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1956 times:

I did not say that the crew forget to set the flaps. I just said the flaps are up and the fact is that aircraft overrun. A landing without flaps will result in high speed landing with risk of heated brakes and the inability to get aircraft to a standstill on time. As usual investigation will show.

Fly easyJet

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: