Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Continental Flight 34 - Domestic Tag ?  
User currently offlinehuxrules From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 132 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2494 times:

Guys- A few weeks ago I was leaving through AUS and noticed that there was a CO flight 34 with service to LHR. Of course I knew that it was going to stop in IAH to switch to something larger than 737. Does anyone know when CO started this flight (and why)? It seems strange to me that they would make a flight number that goes straight to LHR from AUS - or is this common. I also see that there is a CO 35 that goes LHR to AUS. I flew a good number of times on AUS-IAH-LHR so I like to think that it was my flying habits that made them make their own flight number - ha!

HUX

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3060 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2357 times:

CO 4/5 does the same thing except from MSY but we never see the 777 except for weather diversion. I don't like the same flight number if a change of plane but that's another topic.


The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets87 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2283 times:

Quoting huxrules (Thread starter):
It seems strange to me that they would make a flight number that goes straight to LHR from AUS - or is this common.

It's quite common among the airlines, especially on int'l routes and has been the subject of some debate here on Airliners.net over the last few months in multiple threads. Many users, like me, believe it's a scam to call such flights "Direct" since it's no different than a regular connection in a hub. Other users defend the practice saying its how the airlines get their flights to appear higher-up in ticket search engines because supposedly a "Direct" flight is more convenient than a standard connection (no one has been able to convince me that a "Direct" flight through a hub is any more convenient than your flight from AAA to BBB being on one flight number and your flight from BBB to CCC being on another number).


User currently offlinesancho99504 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 569 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

UA has a few of those, notably UA875 DEN-SEA-NRT is a B752 on the DEN-SEA leg and a B77E on the SEA-NRT leg and the same in return.


kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out-USMC
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6520 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2256 times:

Quoting 71Zulu (Reply 1):
CO 4/5 does the same thing except from MSY but we never see the 777 except for weather diversion.

CO has three other "direct" flights from MSY to international destinations:

CO32/33: MSY-IAH-CDG/return
CO128/129: MSY-IAH-GIG/return
CO762/763: MSY-IAH-SAP/return

CO762/763 are actually flown with the same airplane all the way through...right now it's a 737-900.


User currently offlineukoverlander From United Kingdom, joined May 2010, 363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2116 times:

I was on a 'direct' United flight a few years ago that originated in Denver with final destination in Hawaii that interim stopped in San Francisco (but carried the same flight number through to Hawaii). I was only booked on the SF leg. The strange thing was the DEN-SFO was quite late and passengers going through to Hawaii were going to miss the ongoing flight out of SF.

This seemed very strange to me and there were some very angry passengers who didn't think it was possible for this to happen (they didn't realize there was a change of equipment in SFO). In the end I don't know if they made the connection or not but I thought it hard on the passengers who booked a 'direct' flight that left open the possibility that the second sector might leave without the originating passengers (albeit coming in on another aircraft).

It raises another question though - can you have two flights with the same flight number in the air at the same time in US airspace? That seemed strange to me too.

I'd be interested to hear other thoughts on this.


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24817 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2067 times:

Quoting ukoverlander (Reply 5):
It raises another question though - can you have two flights with the same flight number in the air at the same time in US airspace? That seemed strange to me too.

No, if that happens the operational flight number used for ATC purposes etc. is changed for one flight to avoid duplication.


User currently offlineSoxfan From United States of America, joined Mar 2008, 864 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2056 times:

Quoting ukoverlander (Reply 5):
It raises another question though - can you have two flights with the same flight number in the air at the same time in US airspace?

I believe so--they assign a letter to the first flight that's in the air (e.g., flight 258A traveling from SLC-JFK runs late, so the connecting flight JFK-MAD (hypothetical), on a different aircraft, would retain the original flight number (258).



Pilot: "Request push, which way should we face?" JFK Ground: "You better face the front, sir, or you'll scare the pax!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Continental Flight 587 - IAH-LAS, 30-Aug-08 posted Sat Sep 20 2008 15:07:14 by Jetset409
Need Help With Continental Flight posted Wed Feb 6 2008 05:52:13 by Ryanrap1
Load Factor For Continental Flight Please! posted Mon May 14 2007 14:53:22 by Ryanrap1
Continental Flight Emergency Landing! posted Fri Feb 23 2007 01:50:38 by LAXspotter
Saudi Arabia Flight 34 posted Fri Dec 22 2006 08:14:09 by MEACEDAR
Continental Flight, What Is The Amadeus Res #? posted Fri Aug 4 2006 08:34:20 by Luisde8cd
Continental Flight 644 Diverted To SAT? posted Tue Aug 30 2005 01:23:32 by UCSBIslaVista
Continental Flight 744 Emergency Landing At Kiah posted Fri Jul 1 2005 21:45:26 by Wdleiser
Strange Continental Flight? posted Fri Jul 1 2005 14:39:12 by Manairport1
Continental Flight Attendants Vote No On Cuts posted Thu Mar 31 2005 14:52:56 by ContinentalFan