Airbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 10 Posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1060 times:
i have heard that CX is trying to expand itself into more Asian destinations and also because Dragonair no longer belongs to them, they have to "fly" themselves.
CX now only have 19% stake in Dragonair, if memory serves. Dragonair is now requesting to fly the same routes as CX, like HKG-TPE. Unlike SQ and Silk, Silk flies to thinner routes with all-Airbus single-aisle fleet. They aren't competing each other becuase Silk is a 100% owned subsidiary of SQ Group.
So the bottom line is, do you see any narrowbody for CX? Say A320 family or B737NG family? or any CRJ, ERJ? I don't think their smallest a/c in fleet, A333 (300+ pax) can land in some small Asian airports.
I personally thinks that CX might, go for the A320 family for fleet commonality. or if CX insists on wide-body, any chance for the B762ER (190+ pax) or B763ER? (220+ pax) Finally, have CX ever bought second handed planes except the B777 prototype? If they are interested, they might wanna lease a number of rather-new A310-300s? They are quite a lot of A310s that are 5 yrs old. But i do no see this possible. Nothing is impossible. Time will prove everthing.
All opinions are welcome but above are just my thoughts, no offense meant so don't bash at me!
the all-time AIRBUS LOVER
i never say boeing suck...
Teahan From Belgium, joined Nov 1999, 5277 posts, RR: 62 Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 973 times:
JAL, not wanting to spoil your day or start an A vs B war, you can really forget about the B767-400 for CX. CX love and I mean their A330s! The B767-400 would only provide a relatively small capacity reduction over the A330.
Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
Airbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 10 Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 946 times:
I echo Jeremiah and as mentioned before, some small Asian airfields can't accomodate huge A330-300, maybe A330-200 but still... When a A333 t/o on MTOW, on a short runway, say 6500 foot, possible? Bare in mind that lots of Asian destinations have high load factor, tourism etc...
Airbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 10 Reply 8, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 926 times:
United Airline, I am trying to say here that CX might need smaller planes to fly thinner routes if Dragonair emerges as a competitor!
AGAIN, SOME SMALL ASIAN AIRFIELDS CAN ACCOMODATE NEITHER THE HUGE AIRBUS A330 NOR THE HEAVIER A340 OR BOEING 777. THEY NEED A 150-200 SEATER TO FLY ROUTES THAT AREN'T FULL AND A320 WILL DO JUST FINE TAKING OFF IN SMALL AIRPORTS AND FITTING ITSELF INTO THE CURRENT CX FLEET.
DeltAirlines, I agree with you but be aware that CX is obsessed with Airbus and the adding another 'bus into their fleet is ideal due to fleet commonality etc. I seriously do not think a B757 will happen. But who knows? they might even lease some A310-300s?
Swake From Belgium, joined Jan 2001, 231 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 905 times:
I was rather surprised by the news that CX got (nearly) out of Dragonair. Can someone elaborate on the reasons why? I mean, they operate from the same hub and are very compatible. I don't see but disadvantages in their splittin up. Tnx
Airbus_A340 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1558 posts, RR: 20 Reply 14, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 847 times:
The Learjet 45 is for Training purposes only.
I don't believe Cathay will aquire any narrow bodies for the time being. That's just my opinion. Wasn't Dragonair set up so that they could fly into China, and more domestic route, also I thought that is was a "feeder" airline for Cathay Pacific. My opinion, correct me if I'm wrong. Just what I thought.
Airbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 10 Reply 15, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 843 times:
As mentioned above, Dragon no longer belongs to Cathay, somehow. But I think there is a possibility of CX doing such or even set up another "feeder" airline or a regional air, Cathay Pacific Regional???
and one more question, did CX sell its stake in Dragon or wat? if they did sell the share in Dragon, they do such in favour of wat?
Cathay250 From Hong Kong, joined Aug 1999, 218 posts, RR: 1 Reply 16, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 843 times:
Hi airbus lover, CX did sell its stake in Dragonair(KA) before 1997. It is because the China side wanted to play a role in the HK aviation market. Before CX sold share of KA, the China side even registed a 737 in HK as they were going to set up a airline in Hong Kong to compete with CX and KA. Later on CX decided to sell KA to China side, so the China side can control the HK aviation market partly and CX can continue enjoy its status as the solo international airline in HK. So CX was actually selling KA to save themselves.
Now, the government is going to stop the "one route one airline" policy, if it really happens,CX will definitely fly to China. So it 's very likely that CX may need some narrowbody aircarft for the mainland market. And i think they are more likely to order Airbus, since HK is very experienced to maintaince A32X serious. Moreover, don't forget KA 's A320 was ordered by CX.
Airbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 10 Reply 18, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 812 times:
thanks for the info Cathay250.
Hkgspotter1, although the A332 is a long ranger, it can still fly HKG-PEK, why not? I agree that a A32X fits just nice, an A321-200 perhaps? I do not think A332 fits into some small Asian airports as mentioned.
As you may know, TG operates a fleet of around 30 Airbus A300-600R (range: 7700 km) and these planes with the capacity of A332 is the backbone of TG's regional service. TG also flies some A333 (bigger than A332) on BKK-HKT and MH does PEN-KUL and vice versa with A333 oftenly. no problem for big planes. A332 is a recommended replacement for current A300-600R by Airbus.
Swake From Belgium, joined Jan 2001, 231 posts, RR: 0 Reply 19, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 792 times:
Cathay250, tnx! Do I understand your point correctly in that it was a mere swap of interests, i.e. the 'China side' (I assume you mean Beijing directed political groups) gets control of the domestic market while CX is reassured the international traffic?
OK, but then again, why would CX fear competition from a new entry in HK's aviation market (as you mentioned 'the China side' already ordered a 737)? As you said in your first post, it was merely politics, then meaning that CX was under raw, naked political pressure to let Beijing gain influence in HK's aviation???