Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
B6 To End RIC Service To New York's JFK  
User currently offlinescflyboy From United States of America, joined May 2007, 10 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7856 times:

JetBlue Airways is pulling out of the Richmond-JFK market in November.

"We have decided to discontinue service between Richmond and New York/JFK effective Nov. 1, 2010," said Alison Croyle, JetBlue's manager of corporate communications.

The low-cost carrier began service from Richmond International Airport in 2006, and it has two daily nonstop flights to and from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, using 100-seat Embraer 190 jets.

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/business/2010/sep/08/b-jblu08-ar-491089/

JetBlue will still have from RIC; BOS (2), FLL (1) MCO (1).

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6762 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7823 times:

16 daily flights to NYC from RIC.. interesting.. that's okay but not a whole lot.. surprised about this.. perhaps B6 will open a new route from RIC later..


Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineRL757PVD From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4659 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 7788 times:

Quoting ERJ170 (Reply 1):
16 daily flights to NYC from RIC.. interesting.. that's okay but not a whole lot.. surprised about this.. perhaps B6 will open a new route from RIC later..

I wonder if AE will take it over as part of their new agreement?



Experience is what you get when what you thought would work out didn't!
User currently offlineenilria From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 7111 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 7701 times:

Quoting RL757PVD (Reply 2):
I wonder if AE will take it over as part of their new agreement?

Now that's using noggin. I hear they are close to putting the B6 code on AA flights.


User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3433 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 7571 times:

"Now that's using noggin. I hear they are close to putting the B6 code on AA flights."

Very untrue.


User currently offlinejetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2978 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 7450 times:

I think this makes sense. B6 has struggled to make money on its JFK-RIC flights, and using valuable slots on an unprofitable route makes no sense. While disappointing, and clearly an indication of B6's shift in strategy, I guess sometimes you have to make those tough decisions.

I would think that JFK-PIT could be next to go, but the only other PIT service is to BOS. RIC, on the other hand, has decently-performing flights to BOS, FLL and MCO.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineRL757PVD From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4659 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 7274 times:

Quoting enilria (Reply 3):
Now that's using noggin. I hear they are close to putting the B6 code on AA flights.

I'd love to see that happen, PVD-JFK is too close for B6 metal but AE could do it.

When B6 starts PVD im sure it will be similar to a BDL station with Florida only, but throw in AE for JFK and maybe 9K for BOS and PVD can have full access to the B6 network.



Experience is what you get when what you thought would work out didn't!
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32703 posts, RR: 72
Reply 7, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6956 times:

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 4):
"Now that's using noggin. I hear they are close to putting the B6 code on AA flights."

Very untrue.

No, actually very true. A codeshare is in the works and could be announced as soon as next month.



a.
User currently offlinecrosswinds21 From Netherlands, joined Jun 2009, 698 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6842 times:

Quoting RL757PVD (Reply 2):
I wonder if AE will take it over as part of their new agreement?

But if B6 couldn't make it work, how would AA make it work with its less fuel-efficient planes and higher costs?


User currently offlinejfklganyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3433 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6825 times:

"No, actually very true. A codeshare is in the works and could be announced as soon as next month."

Then that would make a lot of senior manager folks at JetBlue very public liars. Doesn't jive with their blue image very much, but let's reconvene in a month and see who was right, okay?

[Edited 2010-09-08 11:43:01]

User currently offlineNASBWI From Bahamas, joined Feb 2005, 1310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 6800 times:

Quoting crosswinds21 (Reply 8):
But if B6 couldn't make it work, how would AA make it work with its less fuel-efficient planes and higher costs?

Perhaps via connections (particularly international ones). True, customers from RIC-JFK on B6 could fly onward to some points (mostly those out west or to the Caribbean), but there are fewer options (save LH, SA, and EI) to go across the pond, or the Pacific. AA would offer those opportunities... Plus, with fewer seats, MQ can perhaps bring better yields with their flights.

It would make logistical sense that most people trying to fly from neighboring - and I use that term loosely - states to NYC would prefer flying to either EWR or LGA (LGA being a slightly more convenient option), rather than JFK.

[Edited 2010-09-08 11:50:54]


Fierce, Fabulous, and Flawless ;)
User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1904 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6776 times:

Quoting NASBWI (Reply 10):
Quoting crosswinds21 (Reply 8):
But if B6 couldn't make it work, how would AA make it work with its less fuel-efficient planes and higher costs?

Perhaps via connections (particularly international ones). True, customers from RIC-JFK on B6 could fly onward to some points (mostly those out west or to the Caribbean), but there are fewer options (save LH, SA, and EI) to go across the pond, or the Pacific. AA would offer those opportunities... Plus, with fewer seats, MQ can perhaps bring better yields with their flights.

Agreed. I think the combination of better connection opportunities and smaller sized aircraft could make the route work for AA.


User currently offlinecrosswinds21 From Netherlands, joined Jun 2009, 698 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6756 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 11):
Agreed. I think the combination of better connection opportunities and smaller sized aircraft could make the route work for AA.

True, but if B6 and AA are going to start codesharing, then an AA flight on JFK-RIC operated by B6 may work better for AA than an AE/MQ flight would. Either of these options would feed AA's international flights at JFK, but the codeshare with B6 would not involve any expenses on AA's part (albeit it wouldn't really gain them much additional revenue either on that sector).


User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1904 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6691 times:

Quoting crosswinds21 (Reply 12):
Quoting EricR (Reply 11):
Agreed. I think the combination of better connection opportunities and smaller sized aircraft could make the route work for AA.

True, but if B6 and AA are going to start codesharing, then an AA flight on JFK-RIC operated by B6 may work better for AA than an AE/MQ flight would. Either of these options would feed AA's international flights at JFK, but the codeshare with B6 would not involve any expenses on AA's part (albeit it wouldn't really gain them much additional revenue either on that sector).

I would agree if Eagle's smallest sized aircraft had the same seating capacity as JetBlue's smallest sized aircraft. I am assuming one of the reasons why AA would take over the route from B6 is because AA has a smaller sized aircraft better suited for the demand on this route.

[Edited 2010-09-08 12:25:33]

User currently offlinedeltal1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 9321 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 6600 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 7):
A codeshare is in the works and could be announced as soon as next month.

Its not that close.....AA must talk to the APA(not sure about TWU or APFA) about any codeshare and it must be approved by the APA. This has yet to happen.



yep.
User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3735 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 6362 times:

Quoting deltal1011man (Reply 14):
Its not that close.....AA must talk to the APA(not sure about TWU or APFA) about any codeshare and it must be approved by the APA. This has yet to happen.

Which, given the APA's mentality as of late, will be a tough sell...



Primary Airport: FWA/Alternate Airport: DTW/Not employed by the FWACAA or their partners
User currently offlineFURUREFA From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 801 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 6261 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 15):
Quoting deltal1011man (Reply 14):
Its not that close.....AA must talk to the APA(not sure about TWU or APFA) about any codeshare and it must be approved by the APA. This has yet to happen.

Which, given the APA's mentality as of late, will be a tough sell...

I could be wrong, but I thought it was only AA's duty to inform the APA that the airline is considering a domestic codesharing operation. I didn't think AA needed the APA's consent.

Matt


User currently offlineBOStonsox From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 1989 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 6020 times:

Quoting jetbluefan1 (Reply 5):
I would think that JFK-PIT could be next to go, but the only other PIT service is to BOS. RIC, on the other hand, has decently-performing flights to BOS, FLL and MCO.

If JFK-PIT went, I wonder if they would keep BOS-PIT regardless of its performance. B6 has only two domestic cities they serve from only one city: BWI and HOU, the latter being way past due to be connected to BOS.

Quoting RL757PVD (Reply 6):
I'd love to see that happen, PVD-JFK is too close for B6 metal but AE could do it.

When B6 starts PVD im sure it will be similar to a BDL station with Florida only, but throw in AE for JFK and maybe 9K for BOS and PVD can have full access to the B6 network.

Maybe they can use the JFK-RIC slots on JFK-MHT. There are likely better options, but with your idea plus this it would be a nice way to cover New England. MHT doesn't have as much competetion as PVD does (and don't forget that Providence has Amtrak).

Quoting NASBWI (Reply 10):
True, customers from RIC-JFK on B6 could fly onward to some points (mostly those out west or to the Caribbean), but there are fewer options (save LH, SA, and EI) to go across the pond, or the Pacific.

Plus they can still do this via BOS.

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 7):
No, actually very true. A codeshare is in the works and could be announced as soon as next month.

Great. I hope you're right. I am looking forward to seeing that!



2013 World Series Champions!
User currently offlinetharanga From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 1864 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5921 times:

Quoting BOStonsox (Reply 17):
Maybe they can use the JFK-RIC slots on JFK-MHT.

From what I've seen on here, jetblue already has unused slots at JFK, even after trading some to AA.


User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32703 posts, RR: 72
Reply 19, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5805 times:

Quoting jfklganyc (Reply 9):
"No, actually very true. A codeshare is in the works and could be announced as soon as next month."

Then that would make a lot of senior manager folks at JetBlue very public liars. Doesn't jive with their blue image very much, but let's reconvene in a month and see who was right, okay?

Deny it all you want, but its in the works.

http://www.thestreet.com/story/10836...-jetblue-negotiate-code-share.html



a.
User currently offlineSurfandSnow From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 2862 posts, RR: 30
Reply 20, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5805 times:

When you think about it, this isn't at all surprising. For short business trips between New York and Richmond, JFK makes no sense to the time-sensitive biz traveler when flights to/from LGA and EWR are available. On the other hand, I can see RIC-BOS being very popular with business travelers as B6 serves the primary (convenient) airport, and the only other choice is a cramped legacy RJ versus the full-size E-jet. As for RIC-MCO and RIC-FLL, I'm sure there is no shortage of Richmonders wishing to visit Disney World and other parks or take a cruise or explore South Florida's legendary beaches.


Flying in the middle seat of coach is much better than not flying at all!
User currently offlineFutureUScapt From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 765 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5448 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 19):

Deny it all you want, but its in the works.

http://www.thestreet.com/story/10836....html

I notice that is says "perhaps a codeshare." In fact, this is the second or third such article I've read where it seems that AA is interested in a deeper relationship, but that B6 seems somewhat apprehensive about doing so (I'm referring to a comment by Arpey earlier this year about how the codeshare option was "on the table" which lead me to believe that AA is willing when/if B6 decides that is the right decision.)

I know I'm probably in the minority here (and that I'll probably get flamed for this) but I think that there is a very real possibility that B6 agreed to the most non-commital type deal that it could just to get the DCA slots that it so desperately wanted.

By any account, it seems that B6 would much rather negotiate deals with international carriers with whom they don't compete with as opposed to a carrier that has a strong domestic NYC presence. Whether or not this partnerships with international carriers will be sufficient for B6's long-term strategy remains to be seen. Perhaps you and others will end up being right about a future AA-B6 codeshare, which would make for quite a force in the NYC market.


User currently offlineflyby519 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5362 times:

Quoting FURUREFA (Reply 16):
I could be wrong, but I thought it was only AA's duty to inform the APA that the airline is considering a domestic codesharing operation. I didn't think AA needed the APA's consent.

Matt

I cant remember the exact specifics, but I know that APA doesnt have supreme veto power for a domestic codeshare. AMR must inform APA of a domestic codeshare, if APA opposes the agreement then it goes to an arbitration for a max of a 30day period. Once the arbitrator rules, game over. APA has an awful record with arbitrators recently, they should do anything to keep this in-house and work out an agreement.



These postings or comments are not a company-sponsored source of communication.
User currently offlinecrAAzy From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 785 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 5119 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting flyby519 (Reply 22):
APA has an awful record with arbitrators recently, they should do anything to keep this in-house and work out an agreement.

It's way too late for that ... AA has moved on with AS on the west coast and now B6 in the Northeast.


User currently offlinejetbluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2978 posts, RR: 14
Reply 24, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 4737 times:

Quoting FutureUScapt (Reply 21):
I know I'm probably in the minority here (and that I'll probably get flamed for this) but I think that there is a very real possibility that B6 agreed to the most non-commital type deal that it could just to get the DCA slots that it so desperately wanted.

I actually have to agree with you on this. I think AA has more to gain by partnering than vice versa, which is supported by Dave Barger's hesitance to agree that AA is a potential code-share partner, but instead has continuously stated that AA is still a major competitor. B6 wanted DCA access, and they wanted it NOW. AA, which has yet to partner with another airline to form its own mega-airline, saw an opportunity to partner up with a rather forceful LCC - which happened to have its largest station at one of AA's largest stations. Not to mention that having feed for the European and South American flights could never hurt. And slots - 17 of them. JetBlue was so desperate to get into DCA that it gave up nearly double the amount of slots it gained at its largest station. The 1 HPN slot still puzzles me.

In my opinion, dropping RIC-JFK may actually be a negative for B6's new fascination with establishing interline partners. RIC is an example of a market that the international interline partners would like to have access to. While it will continue to be served from BOS - which will mean that Aer Lingus, LH and AA still have access to the market - El Al and SA will not, not to mention that only offering BOS connections means less opportunities to drive revenue. But then again, I have no evidence to suggest that RIC was a strong market for international connections. Perhaps it was an insignificant amount.

Whatever the case, participating in a code share - if done strategically - could be a win-win situation for both B6 and AA. But it shouldn't prevent either airline for looking to partner with others - even if the partner airline is a competitor.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
25 nwaesc : Well, apparently it's more than plenty right now...
26 jfklganyc : Except in that article, the JetBlue guy says this: "The two carriers recently announced plans to enable customers to earn frequent flier miles on eith
27 OzarkD9S : They key word in B6's statement is "traditional". Will be intersting to see if they can hammer out some new form of codesharing and what that might l
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aerogal To New York JFK posted Fri Aug 14 2009 09:00:53 by Summa767
British Airways To Fly Cardiff - New York JFK? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 01:55:13 by 8herveg
Newburgh (SWF) To New York (JFK) posted Tue Aug 23 2005 07:48:47 by AlitaliaMD11
Air Santo Domingo First Flights To New York JFK posted Thu May 22 2003 15:03:11 by CaboVerde
Air Bosna To New York Jfk? posted Thu Jun 6 2002 07:57:23 by JU101
Trip Report: Dublin To New York, JFK posted Thu Aug 3 2000 19:32:11 by Aer Lingus
PIA To Increase New York Service posted Tue Jan 8 2008 08:06:31 by 777way
PIA To Reduce New York Frequency posted Mon Sep 24 2007 19:51:52 by 777way
Cayman Airways To Start New York Flights posted Sun May 20 2007 19:38:08 by Semsem
AI To Fly New York-BOM Non-Stop From April 2007 posted Fri Sep 1 2006 02:33:29 by LAXDESI