Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CO 753's / 764's At ORD Post Merger?  
User currently offlineGlobalCabotage From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 602 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8786 times:

Now that the merger is weeks away, will CO shift 753's (besides IAH service) and/or 764's or ORD?

Also, with EK ending their "agreement" with CO, will we see CO/UA flying IAH and/or ORD to DXB soon?

58 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5700 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8785 times:

I wouldnt be surprised to see 764's at ORD or IAD or SFO sometime soon. Same with the 762's.


Check out my blog at fl310travel.blogspot.com!
User currently offlineusairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3414 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8695 times:

Quoting GlobalCabotage (Thread starter):
Now that the merger is weeks away, will CO shift 753's (besides IAH service) and/or 764's or ORD?

The merger is not weeks away. The entire process will take many many more months and I don't think you will see cross use of aircraft until well into 2011. However once this happens a combined UA/CO will have a large number of TA aircraft (752, 762, 763, 764, 772, 744) to reposition around their network and UA hubs will likely see legacy CO aircraft while CO hubs will see UA legacy aircraft.

Quoting GlobalCabotage (Thread starter):
Also, with EK ending their "agreement" with CO, will we see CO/UA flying IAH and/or ORD to DXB soon?

I think you have a better chance at IAH-DXB but with EK going double daily who knows


User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5192 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8595 times:

Quoting usairways85 (Reply 2):
The merger is not weeks away. The entire process will take many many more months and I don't think you will see cross use of aircraft until well into 2011. However once this happens a combined UA/CO will have a large number of TA aircraft (752, 762, 763, 764, 772, 744) to reposition around their network and UA hubs will likely see legacy CO aircraft while CO hubs will see UA legacy aircraft.

Not quite sure about that...indications are that we will see cross fleeting occur in Jan/Feb schedules that will be uploaded next month. I would like to see cross fleeting occur next month...



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16878 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8563 times:

Quoting GlobalCabotage (Thread starter):
Now that the merger is weeks away, will CO shift 753's (besides IAH service) and/or 764's or ORD?

ORD-HNL 764 sounds good. Also with regards to the 753s, during the Winter months they are needed for EWR-Florida/Caribbean. During the Summer months they can operate ORD-LAX/SFO/SEA/PDX/SAN.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25543 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8536 times:

Don't expect miracles or much in the area of cross fleeting in the short term.

Not until the airlines have a common work force, and crew bases can there be much synergy benefits without creating added cost and operational complications. A couple flights here or there sure, but like Delta the true cross fleeting experiments will not occur until a SOC a couple years down the road.

Also eventually decisions regarding future cabin configurations and such will dictate also how planes are eventually used. (for instance todays 2-class 763 used mostly to Hawaii reconfigured for international, and back filled with CO 737/757s.)



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineusairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3414 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 8524 times:

Quoting drerx7 (Reply 3):
Not quite sure about that...indications are that we will see cross fleeting occur in Jan/Feb schedules that will be uploaded next month. I would like to see cross fleeting occur next month...

I would be curious to see this. Currently it does not appear that they plan to merge FF programs in 2011, which means any cross use of aircraft would result in different benefits for elites. They finally started cooperating on upgrades and priority seating but it is currently restricted to day of departure requests. There are rumors that this will be fully implemented (not restricted to just day of departure) sometime in the Fall, but that is anyone's guess.


User currently offlineusairways85 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3414 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 8478 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 5):
Not until the airlines have a common work force, and crew bases can there be much synergy benefits without creating added cost and operational complications. A couple flights here or there sure, but like Delta the true cross fleeting experiments will not occur until a SOC a couple years down the road.

I'll have to agree with you here, this is far more important for cross fleeting than elite benefits. Although as a frequent CO flier that is of course what is on my mind  


User currently offlineTOMMY767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6584 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 8073 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 4):
EWR-Florida/Caribbean. During the Summer months they can operate ORD-LAX/SFO/SEA/PDX/SAN.

True. Also wouldn't be surprised to see the 753s on IAD-SJU or IAD-CUN



"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
User currently offlinefun2fly From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1052 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 7709 times:

Quoting usairways85 (Reply 2):
The merger is not weeks away. The entire process will take many many more months and I don't think you will see cross use of aircraft until well into 2011. However once this happens a combined UA/CO will have a large number of TA aircraft (752, 762, 763, 764, 772, 744) to reposition around their network and UA hubs will likely see legacy CO aircraft while CO hubs will see UA legacy aircraft.

Cross fleeting is scheduled to occur in Feb/Mar 2011.

CO will essentially add 1 777 to the fleet (the unit that has been rotating out to get the new BF seats as of Jan 1 - but that will go to the new Cairo service. As for the 752's, by July they will add back in the unit that was also rotating out for the new BF seats.

Don't forget, CO has 3 of 6 788's in Q3/Q4 2011 to add to the mix and 5 more in 2012 (plus any more that Smisek was able to negotiate into 2012 during his meeting with Boeing last week).

Plus, will new UA convert the 26th 744 to the new configuration? Or pull others from the desert?

As for the 753's, makes perfect sense to put them all on west coast to Hawaii service to free up widebodies and lower CASM.

As for the 764's, not sure sense to put them on the ORD>HNL route (although CO has the maintenance hub there), but it would considerably affect volume as there is about a 125 seat difference (772A vs. 764) and what would they use the 772A for? Unless the equip w/new interior and put on EWR/LHR I guess.


User currently offlineiahflyer From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 320 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 7539 times:

Quoting fun2fly (Reply 9):
CO will essentially add 1 777 to the fleet (the unit that has been rotating out to get the new BF seats as of Jan 1 - but that will go to the new Cairo service.

What?? When did this occur? There is no mention of this on the route map at CO.com



Little airports with the big jets are the best!! Floyd
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16878 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 7513 times:

Quoting iahflyer (Reply 10):
What?? When did this occur? There is no mention of this on the route map at CO.com

Back in July;

http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf...ontinental_airlines_to_add_se.html



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlinejunction From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 768 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 7497 times:

Quoting fun2fly (Reply 9):
Cross fleeting is scheduled to occur in Feb/Mar 2011.

Also keep in mind that there is cross fleeting as soon as January for Express and some mainline. In about two weeks there will be a lot more details on this.


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16878 posts, RR: 51
Reply 13, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 7471 times:

Quoting junction (Reply 12):
Also keep in mind that there is cross fleeting as soon as January for Express and some mainline. In about two weeks there will be a lot more details on this.

EWR desparately needs CR7s and E-170s to replace the ERJs on routes such as EWR-ATL.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineTOMMY767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6584 posts, RR: 9
Reply 14, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 7238 times:

Quoting fun2fly (Reply 9):
As for the 764's, not sure sense to put them on the ORD>HNL route (although CO has the maintenance hub there),

Considering CO already flies the 764 on EWR-HNL, I could see them rotating it as something like EWR-HNL-ORD-EWR-ORD-HNL or something along those lines. Maybe even shed EWR-HNL for a one stop via ORD.

Quoting STT757 (Reply 13):
EWR desparately needs CR7s and E-170s to replace the ERJs on routes such as EWR-ATL.

And many others: CLT, RDU, DCA, YYZ, PIT, MCI, OKC, BNA off the top of my head.



"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16878 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 7226 times:

Quoting TOMMY767 (Reply 14):
Maybe even shed EWR-HNL for a one stop via ORD.

Negative.

That totally negates the advantage of conveinence having the route in the first place, EWR-HNL is a very popular and lucrative route for CO. Plus HNL is a 764 maintenance base, rotating the 764s from EWR to HNL for maintenance needs to be done.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9661 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 7153 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 4):
Also with regards to the 753s, during the Winter months they are needed for EWR-Florida/Caribbean. During the Summer months they can operate ORD-LAX/SFO/SEA/PDX/SAN.

I would expect changes. Both UA and CO have high capacity domestic planes (CO has the 753 and UA has 763s). It has been years since UA has put anything larger than a 757 to SEA, PDX or SAN (other than SEA-NRT).

Quoting TOMMY767 (Reply 14):

Considering CO already flies the 764 on EWR-HNL, I could see them rotating it as something like EWR-HNL-ORD-EWR-ORD-HNL or something along those lines. Maybe even shed EWR-HNL for a one stop via ORD.

I cannot imagine ORD-HNL going from 777 to 767. The 777s are high capacity and not slated to be converted to international service. A 767 would be a downgrade in capacity.

In the longer term, I could see some of CO's 767s to Hawaii being replaced by UA's 2 class 767s and 777s since the demand for BusinessFirst quality seats on the domestic route has not traditionally supported internationally configured planes. It is a long flight, but people don't pay the same fares as international flights of the same duration.

Quoting STT757 (Reply 15):

That totally negates the advantage of conveinence having the route in the first place, EWR-HNL is a very popular and lucrative route for CO. Plus HNL is a 764 maintenance base, rotating the 764s from EWR to HNL for maintenance needs to be done.

Maintenance operations will be integrated and UA's base at SFO already does their 767 fleet. UA also has a maintenance base in HNL.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineCODC10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2418 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 6896 times:

Quoting TOMMY767 (Reply 14):
Maybe even shed EWR-HNL for a one stop via ORD.

No chance. EWR-HNL is a profitable route that generates a lot of paid premium traffic due to the convenience of it being the only nonstop from the New York area.

Quoting STT757 (Reply 15):
Plus HNL is a 764 maintenance base, rotating the 764s from EWR to HNL for maintenance needs to be done.
Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 16):

Maintenance operations will be integrated and UA's base at SFO already does their 767 fleet. UA also has a maintenance base in HNL.

The HNL facility exists mostly for line maintenance and other work in support of CO 767s in Micronesia. CO also leases the space to other carriers (HA, mostly) as needed since it is the only widebody bay in the Pacific (as I understand). CO does not perform heavy checks here. The mainland-based CO 767s could definitely be absorbed into United's existing mx shop in SFO.

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 16):
The 777s are high capacity and not slated to be converted to international service. A 767 would be a downgrade in capacity.

While it may not be slated at present, it certainly wouldn't shock me to see some domestic 777s converted to international standard, although I would expect UA to pull all 747s out of the desert and reconfigure them first. International growth is going to be a big part of the carrier's strategy over the next several years and it needs to be 'all hands on deck'.


User currently offlinedrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5192 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6117 times:

Quoting TOMMY767 (Reply 14):
Considering CO already flies the 764 on EWR-HNL, I could see them rotating it as something like EWR-HNL-ORD-EWR-ORD-HNL or something along those lines. Maybe even shed EWR-HNL for a one stop via ORD.

Negative, the 764 rotates to Europe (the EWR and one of the IAH flights) the bird that goes IAH-HNL-GUM-NRT etc is normally a Pacific configured bird. CO would not have a BusinessFirst bird on a EWR-HNL-ORD type of circuit - thats what UA domestic 76/77s are for.

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 16):

In the longer term, I could see some of CO's 767s to Hawaii being replaced by UA's 2 class 767s and 777s since the demand for BusinessFirst quality seats on the domestic route has not traditionally supported internationally configured planes. It is a long flight, but people don't pay the same fares as international flights of the same duration.

That I could see, I am not convinced yet that UA would reconfigure all those Hawaii heavies when they have a few 747s in the desert. Maybe down the line, but even still there is ALOT of opportunity to be had and routes that can be swapped and opened with the addition of the 787s and 747s pulled back into service without touching the leisure fleet.



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25543 posts, RR: 50
Reply 19, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6064 times:

Quoting fun2fly (Reply 9):
Plus, will new UA convert the 26th 744 to the new configuration? Or pull others from the desert?

There are only 24 in the new IPTE, with 25th floating around in the old config, which should get parked again this winter.

No plans for additional reconfigurations on 744 fleet as the conversion line and vendor contract has ended. Matter of fact, I expect a few 744 tails could be sold soon as there has been some recent interest.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineGlobalCabotage From United States of America, joined Nov 2009, 602 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (4 years 1 week 4 days ago) and read 5625 times:

The merger will officially be completed by October 1, 2010, but it will take a long time to integrate the operations.

We've talked about a 764 on ORD - HNL, but this would be a big seat drop. How about 2x ORD-HNL on 764 and 777 on EWR to HNL?


User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9661 posts, RR: 52
Reply 21, posted (4 years 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5457 times:

Quoting GlobalCabotage (Reply 20):

We've talked about a 764 on ORD - HNL, but this would be a big seat drop. How about 2x ORD-HNL on 764 and 777 on EWR to HNL?

If UA wanted more lift to Hawaii, I would expect it from DEN or SFO/LAX. UA has 7-10 redeye flights from Hawaii to the mainland. They can stretch the 757 ETOPS fleet to get more seats out of the west coast airports without affecting fleet utilization. They can use them while they would normally be on the ground.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2649 posts, RR: 9
Reply 22, posted (4 years 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5356 times:

Quoting drerx7 (Reply 18):
Negative, the 764 rotates to Europe (the EWR and one of the IAH flights) the bird that goes IAH-HNL-GUM-NRT etc is normally a Pacific configured bird. CO would not have a BusinessFirst bird on a EWR-HNL-ORD type of circuit - thats what UA domestic 76/77s are for.

I believe the HNL-EWR-HNL service is a turn at EWR and doesn't regularly swap with other 764s at EWR. In fact, I don't think there are other 764s in EWR when the HNL flight leaves.
Since the UA 763 (244 seats) and CO 764 (256 Hawaiian config) are pretty close in seat count, if UA wanted fewer seats on Hawaiian services than the 772A, you'd think that would be the case now with a 763ER.

The question I think that needs to be answered is if the merged carrier is OK with domestic F seats to Hawaii or if the CO lie flats are desired. You'd think the standard F seats would win out to standardize service (772s, 763ERs, 752s and 738/739ERs are standard F seats), which might mean there are a couple of options for equipment swaps.

1.) The HNL-EWR and the second IAH-HNL 764s (non-GUM through flight) would potentially be shifted to European routes. This could allow two 753s to cover for UA 763ERs on some Hawaiian or hub to hub flights, 763s taking over for CO 764s and 764s going to Europe. You'd think some European routes might do better with the 20/235 764 configuration or they could be fairly easily converted to the standard 764 configuration.

2.) The replacement of 764s on IAH-HNL, EWR-HNL, GUM -HNL and NRT-GUM with UA 763ER high density configurations. This is a downgrade of only 12 seats. To accomplish this, take six or seven 753s and replace six or seven 763 aircraft's flying (domestic hub flying and/or Hawaiian flying). The net would be 6 or 7 764s being available for European or South American flying. This would standardize F seats to/from Hawaii and to non-competitive GUM-HNL to 763ER aircraft The other benefit would be on mx as the aircraft would flow in and out of HNL and SFO. 764s would be more concentrated in EWR-Europe, standardizing seating/services and mx opportunities. 753 would be heavily involved in hub-to hub and Hawaiian flying, again standardizing seating and mx opportunities.

It could also be that at least one HNL-SFO could be flown with a 764 Hawaiian config aircraft to move 764s through the SFO mx base.

[Edited 2010-09-21 16:01:35]

User currently offlinerampguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (4 years 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4781 times:

You're forgetting that CO will not be making the decisions as to what to do about EWR-HNL. It will become UA's call. Sure it may be profitable for CO right now, but no one knows if UA will keep this route. It may be moved to IAD.

User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2649 posts, RR: 9
Reply 24, posted (4 years 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 4763 times:

Quoting rampguy (Reply 23):
You're forgetting that CO will not be making the decisions as to what to do about EWR-HNL. It will become UA's call. Sure it may be profitable for CO right now, but no one knows if UA will keep this route. It may be moved to IAD.

The merger is a merger and CO's influence on decisions will be equal than UA's.

UA probably moves connections via ORD instead of IAD as IAD has a smaller catchment area for Hawaii than ORD. I rather doubt the new UA will cut EWR-HNL to move the flight to IAD.

Maybe a non-stop from IAD is in the future, but not at the expense of EWR's flight.


25 GlobalCabotage : Agree that IAD-HNL will not happen at the expense of EWR-HNL. This is part of my thinking for 2x ORD-HNL and 1x EWR-HNL. Also, UA/CO could shft a 764
26 CODC10 : Even though the chief decisionmaker at United will be a CO guy? United isn't simply absorbing Continental into its existing operations... CO will be
27 laca773 : What routes would see 764s/762s out of SFO?? I don't see any. Those birds are for international flights. On the other hand, perhaps we'll see UA open
28 traindoc : The new airline will be 55% UA, which means they rule, despite Smisek and other CO execs moving to Chicago. I think you will see the bulk of the CO fl
29 deltal1011man : errrr depends on what you mean by completed.......if you mean UA/CO are now DL/OH or AA/MQ (they are owned by the same company) then yes, its done no
30 TOMMY767 : You got any evidence whatsoever to back that up? That's ridiculous. The new UA realizes that IAH will actually be THE LARGEST HUB IN THE ENTIRE NETWO
31 MSPNWA : I can see that too, along with transcons from LAX/SFO/IAD/EWR. It's the type of route that NW used them on from the start (plus the tag to Hawaii). S
32 traindoc : To TOMMY 767: I realize that my post is very negative about the upcoming merger, and it is intended to be so. Mergers are primarliy designed to benefi
33 ss278 : Rumor from a friend at Delta has it that the new "UAL" will get rid of the 764's and that Delta is interested in acquiring them. Time will tell.
34 Antoniemey : I wouldn't put much stock in that. While CO only has 16 of the 764s, that's the second-largest type in their widebody fleet. It's cheaper to run, on
35 drerx7 : Why would they do that? There is no logical basis for what you are saying. Remember the new UA will start flying EWR-CAI, IAH-AKL, IAH-ASE, and IAH-L
36 CALPSAFltSkeds : DL buying CO's 764 would make as much sense as a rumor that CO is buying DL's 764s. Unless CO/UA is engineering a trade in deal with Boeing of the en
37 TOMMY767 : This is a synergy merger. Yes many shareholders will benefit, but the theme of this merger is how both UA and CO have compatibility and if they chose
38 jbmitt : Fact of the matter is that the current CO domestic product is better than the UA product. Put the better product in more competitive markets ie) ORD,
39 Antoniemey : Here's the problem with that, though... Once the merger "finalizes" you have two separate airlines owned by one holding company that are going to tak
40 jbmitt : I see what you're getting at.. but aircraft truly aren't based at any one location. Rather than the traditional out and backs at hub cities the new U
41 DeltAirlines : Saying the EWR market isn't competitive is an absolute joke. EWR as an airport will be dominated by UA/CO, but they are directly competing for New Yo
42 usairways85 : These out stations are also not staffed for any significant maintenance work. Currently a CO aircraft doesn't go a day (most situations) without pass
43 Post contains images UnitedTristar : I was thinking SFO CDG would do quite well on a 767-200 -m
44 rampguy : Would the 767-200 be able to run SFO-CDG non-stop?
45 AADC10 : They will not be shifted anytime soon, if at all. It takes time to shift around the support services not to mention the 18 months or so it will take
46 laca773 : I could see this working. Thanks for the suggestion. I had forgotten UA had dropped SFO-CDG a while ago.
47 CALPSAFltSkeds : The 753s do not fly TATL, but do some flying to S. America. Mostly, they are used for heavy markets like LAS, MCO and heavy EWR-West Coast routes. Wh
48 drerx7 : I definitely disagree. The 753 already flies to ORD and it does not add any further complexity. The 764 can flow right into ORD via a European turn a
49 STT757 : The first announced 787 routes (IAH-AKL, IAH-Lagos) are new routes, not replacing 767 routes. I expect most (if not all) of the 787s CO has on order
50 cslusarc : I think that DL could pick up CO's 764s by December 31st, 2016 if the new UA can accelerate all current 787 deliveries to occur before this date and t
51 Post contains images hiflyer : Some good discussions here.... First off I agree the 764 fleet needs to be combined to one carrier for economics...too small otherwise. Secondly UA's
52 laca773 : Where does the 753 fly to in South America? I don't believe they send it anywhere in South America but perhaps to SJU, and SJO in Central America. CO
53 drerx7 : Check the schedules. IAH-ORD has had the 753 all summer and its still on the schedules now. You can check the a.net database as well as continental.c
54 crucianpilot : 753 flies LIM occasionally. It also flies Guatemala, San Pedro sula, cancun, panama city as well. Depends on what marketing decides to do.
55 compensateme : Bad rumor. DL has oodles of idle widebody capacity - why would it want to add more?
56 brilondon : They do, but not in what you might think. The care if they are put in to those Brazilian Sardine cans, ERJ-145's, for over three and half hours. Food
57 Viscount724 : DL never operated the 762ER, only the standard 762. UA only took delivery of standard 762s but about 8 were converted to ERs.
58 TOMMY767 : CO has pulled the whole 3:30 E145 game for years. Like IAH-YUL, EWR-OKC, EWR-OMA for instance. Those will all likely end post merger.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO/UA Livery Post Merger? posted Fri Apr 23 2010 06:51:27 by cb777
Is CO Moving At ORD? posted Thu Oct 15 2009 11:26:38 by WROORD
CO 753 At MAN? posted Tue Feb 13 2007 04:48:54 by Continental123
TK A343 And CO 764 At MAN Today? posted Tue Oct 18 2005 16:12:45 by Gkirk
How Is The Former ATA 753 Now At CO Doing? posted Tue Sep 27 2005 20:22:20 by N62NA
CO 764 At SVO May 22 2005, Anyone Explain? posted Sun Jul 24 2005 17:08:22 by TWA902fly
How Many CO Gates At ORD posted Thu Oct 14 2004 05:05:48 by Ord747cle
CO To ATL, DFW, ORD At EWR? posted Fri Jul 4 2003 00:05:25 by Rolo987
Lufthansa A330 In AA Hangar At ORD posted Sun May 2 2010 15:02:46 by LFutia
Board Members Of The "post-merger" United? posted Sat May 1 2010 19:08:09 by craigpc01