Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Speculating: WN/FL Possible Livery Change  
User currently offlineswalifebtw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4688 times:

This is only for fun. I know WN will most likely never change it's livery anytime soon, but could anyone come up with some hybrid or combined livery for the new improved WN/FL. Maybe a whole new livery for WN. Like what UA/CO has done...Any thoughts?

[Edited 2010-10-03 21:09:49]

[Edited 2010-10-03 21:10:30]

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2728 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4541 times:

Fun thought, but WN is not having a merger of equals with much smaller AirTran, rather a buyout. Any livery cahnge would require repainting or tat least touch ups on 550 active WN aircraft. That's vs. 52 AirTran 73Gs and 86 717s that may not be long for the combined fleet.

User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4528 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4473 times:

Quoting CALPSAFltSkeds (Reply 1):
That's vs. 52 AirTran 73Gs and 86 717s that may not be long for the combined fleet.

Southwest indicated in the Q & A in the press release (google it at Washington Business Journal) that they are planning to keep the 717's, which they think will be useful for serving smaller markets than they typically serve (read many of the AirTran spoke stations).

Unless someone has information from the company, I see no reason why WN would change their paint scheme. As noted above, this is a buyout. WN's brand also has stronger market power.

But on the 717's: as some have argued in the other threads, the 717's would look best in WN's livery if the "Southwest" title is placed on the fuselage above the windows forward, like was done on the 727's. The shorter 717 tail doesn't have enough vertical space for the nine-letter word in nice big letters like on the 737 tail.

Jim

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darrel W. Duarte




Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineswalifebtw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3874 times:

Does anyone think that WN might put winglets on their -500 and the up coming 717's?

User currently offlineelbandgeek From United States of America, joined Jun 2008, 759 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3785 times:

I would expect the 717s will allow for an expedited retirement of the 500s so I doubt they'll put much into referbs on them, and that includes winglets. As for for the 717s themselves, they've never been developed because they would offer very little benefit for the added cost and weight. The 717 wing (virtually identical to the DC9) is very efficient on its own and doesn't really need them. Same goes for the MD80/90

User currently offlineSXDFC From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 2446 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3689 times:

Quoting swalifebtw (Reply 3):
Does anyone think that WN might put winglets on their -500

The -500s wont get winglets. For the flights WN operates them on it negates the benifits of having them installed. IMHO the 717s will help accelerate the retirement of the oldest 737-300s and the 737-500's.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineXT6Wagon From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 3432 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3648 times:

Quoting swalifebtw (Reply 3):
Does anyone think that WN might put winglets on their -500

-500 has a higher chance of getting skylights and a disco ball than winglets.

717, I am unaware of any winglets for them, but money talks and if Aviation Partners sees enough of a market and the market sees enough benifit... there is a slight chance.


User currently offline737tdi From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 933 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3529 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hey: I just installed a disco ball yesterday............The 500's are younger then the early fleet. The early 300's will go first. Period. Not an opinion, just truth. The 717 will stay for a while I think. There are alot of Douglas mechs. here believe it or not. I have been with WN for 10+ yrs. but most of my 30 years of experience is with DC8's and DC9's and FA18's. I, as well as many others understand the brand!!!!!!!!

User currently offlinewilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1354 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3488 times:

Its a shame SWA doesn't use the "new" classic gold colors. I have seen way too many faded Canyon Blue aircraft.

User currently offlineXT6Wagon From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 3432 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3467 times:

Quoting 737tdi (Reply 7):
The 500's are younger then the early fleet. The early 300's will go first. Period. Not an opinion, just truth

right, but the 500 isn't on any upgrade list as far as I know. They will certainly last longer than some 300's, but go before all the 300s are gone. Guessing by the winglet upgrade plans, it sounds like they were going to be going before the 300 fleet is 1/2 gone. With the merger who knows as they certainly have a huge pile of work ahead on the route map and equipment upgrades/sales/purchace/etc.


User currently offlineBooDog From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 258 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3448 times:

You have to remember, winglets only benefit an aircraft at full speed and altitude; their weight can be penalizing on flights under 300-400 miles. That's why they keep the -500's on routes with short flights. For example, DAL-LBB-ABQ-LAS-LAX.


B1B - best looking aircraft ever.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
To Kill A WN/FL Merger - At The Last Moment? posted Wed Sep 29 2010 17:35:39 by Goblin211
WN/FL Merger Effect On RIC/PHF/ORF posted Tue Sep 28 2010 18:49:55 by bpat777
WN/FL Merger: Impact On Airports posted Tue Sep 28 2010 11:17:45 by Moderators
WN/FL Merger: Impact On Alliances posted Tue Sep 28 2010 11:17:22 by Moderators
WN/FL Merger: Impact On Regionals posted Tue Sep 28 2010 11:17:00 by Moderators
WN/FL Merger: Impact On Employees posted Tue Sep 28 2010 11:16:35 by Moderators
WN/FL Merger: Impact On Fleets & Routes posted Tue Sep 28 2010 11:16:07 by Moderators
STL Cautious Over WN/FL Deal posted Tue Sep 28 2010 08:47:46 by atrude777
WN/FL Airport Terminals Post Merger posted Mon Sep 27 2010 21:49:23 by apodino
WN / FL Impact On BWI posted Mon Sep 27 2010 17:23:01 by GlobalCabotage