Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ceilidh, Time For A Definitive Answer?  
User currently offlineSA365C1 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2001, 131 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1982 times:

Ceilidh,

What is the story with your planned airline, is it going to happen, just that I have seen your website and the last update was 12th January 2001, I thought there maybe some new information you may wish to share.

I am not trying to jump on the bandwagon of the people who give you pelters for trying to make a imaginery airline, I am just very interested to know if it will happen or not??

49 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineGalaxy5 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2034 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1833 times:

hey Ceilidh will you hire me to fly for you. i need a job im getting out of the airforce soon.


"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1826 times:

Can I request that no one answers this, we all know where its going to lead.

User currently offlineEnglandair From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2000, 2228 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1823 times:

Yes I'd be interested to read Ceilidhs reply too.
Johan, can we please not close this topic this strait away?


User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1864 times:

SA365C1 - in this business there's no such thing as a definitive answer on such a big project as that which I'm trying to accomplish. It would be easy for me to say "absolutely" - but that wouldn't be entirely accurate as there are so many outside factors involved - many of which I have absolutely no control over. Asb B747-437B - he thought that he and his team, backed by a respected financial group that we have mutual contacts at, would enable him and the people he was working with to pull off the TWA takeover. They spent a great deal of money - all on risk. And, at the end of the day, it was all for nothing.

I will say this - I've assembled a first class team and we'll give it all we've got. We're still a long way off yet, though, and lots can still go wrong - especially with the current Bermuda II negotiations creating a fair amount of animosity between the UK and US governments.

So yes, we're still working on it and we're quietly confident that we'll be airborne within the next year or so. Funding is pretty much in place and the aircraft are getting cheaper by the day!

As you say, there are those around who will 'give us pelters' - if I was them, I'd have adopted more of a wait and see attitude or at the most contributed constructive criticism... this industry is very small and those in it tend to have long memories.

Then of course there are the complete scumbags!! Big grin Big grin Big grin


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1818 times:

We have waited and been lied to repeatedly!
Iain


User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1806 times:

This is one of those cases where I am able to look into the future...... here goes.

1: The initial innocent question.
2: Freeboot appears and starts his usual line of questioning.
3: The Guv issues a rebuttal asking for Freeboots identity.
4: The Guv appears in another persona to vouch for himself. Lawyergirl was already used, so it wont be that one.
5: The Guv gets caught out.
6: The Guv issues a lawyers letter to the bulletin boards owner.
7: The Guv then denies issuing this letter and says that it was a misunderstanding.
8: The board owner bans all discussions about The Guv, Ceilidh, CalWings, Celtic Airways and Delta L1011's.
9: The whole thing starts again on yet another board.

Let the game begin.........



User currently offlineWirraway From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1824 times:

To those that don't know the story, its a long story
but well worth the read.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


....The "Sunday Mail" has taken up Robertson many times, and they can also reveal that he, who calls himself "The Guvnor" on PPrune and "Ceilidh" on Airliners Net,........
..........................................................................

"We haven't really talked with Caledonian Wings." was the reply when I asked Delta Air Lines about the airline.

Frequent visitors of this website, or people who know about the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar well, probably thought ÒWhat!?Ó the moment you read this first sentence. Caledonian Wings, formerly known as Celtic Airways, has been known for its humongous, ironic plan that took the airline industry observers by surprise; a plan to purchase 44 L-1011s from Atlanta-based mega carrier Delta Air Lines. Neil Robertson, the Chief Executive Officer of Caledonian Wings has been telling the media since early this year that he is under negotiations with Delta Air Lines, and that talks were progressing smoothly, despite slowly. According to Robertson, the new airline would offer low-fare transatlantic flights from Scotland's Prestwick International Airport commencing April 2001. He claims that the airline will grow quickly, becoming the largest operator of the L-1011, opening and thus developing Scottish tourism. Well, then what did Delta's words mean!?

Recently, I had been receiving numerous letters asking whether Caledonian Wings really existed or not. They had announced their existence in spring 2000, and surprised, or should I say took everyone by doubt, when they told the media that they intended to acquire 44 L-1011s from Delta for ACMI (Aircraft Crew Maintenance Insurance) services. Robertson reported that the new airline would be based at Shannon, and that a huge L-1011 overhaul complex would be built there. TriStar enthusiasts around the world were probably delighted to hear this, since it was like a dream coming true. But, when Robertson kept giving similar announcements on and on that he was "making progress, despite slowly", shades of dark clouds started to gather in our minds.

When Robertson first emailed me, he was not asking me to assist in finding an airworthy L-1011 TriStar available at a reasonable price, but instead asked me if I could suggest a good name for his new airline! I replied "Excel" (now used by former Sabre Airways), but then he told me that he had made up his mind on "Celtic Airways", the reason being that "Celtic" was his favorite word. Next, he emailed me a large chart identifying the names and registrations he hoped to apply to the L-1011s he planned to acquire, which he hadn't even submitted to the Ireland's aviation authority. After that, he introduced me Africargo Airlines and told me that they operated ACMI leases worldwide with Boeing 747Fs, L-1011Fs and "many" cargo propliners. He also told me about City Connexions Airlines, which he said was a local airline based in Burundi utilizing a fleet of "fuel-efficient" Canadair CL-44s. I searched for the two airlines in several aviation directories and publications, including "JP Airline Fleets", but I could not find anything about it, and nor did my friends did. Robertson told me that he negotiated with BWIA for three months in acquiring three L-1011-500s. He reports that the negotiations were terminated since BWIA asked too much money for the aircraft. But BWIA has nothing about the discussions on their website. Before summer, Robertson told me that he had plans on setting up a leasing company exclusively for the L-1011 in Gibraltar named Elten Acquisitions Limited, and that Caledonian Wings would lease the L-1011s from them. Well, let's see, what's the point of leasing aircraft from a subsidiary leasing company? Recently, he told me that he would rename his airline "Caledonian Wings" with the "parent company"(?) being named "Wings Holdings", although he didn't tell me any reasons for this move. He then told me his tie up with BPI Aerospace to form a large company to acquire the L-1011s from Delta. But BPI Aerospace has nothing about it on their website either. Anyway, why would anyone form an airline by forming an alliance with a company who's major is in providing spare parts?

One day, a pilot who had lost his job with Kitty Hawk International, because of the airline's bankruptcy, came up to me if I could help him find a new job, of course as a TriStar pilot. At that point of time, I did not know much about Celtic, so I suggested him to try Celtic, and told him Robertson's mail address. The pilot later told me that Robertson answered him, but his words had absolutely no reliability. "The salaries were too good to believe..."

Turning back to the basics, the most important thing for any kind of business is "money." He has boasted of creating 250 jobs at Prestwick with direct flights to Boston, Orlando, New York, Los Angeles, Toronto, and Washington DC for as little as 165 pounds roundtrip. Recently, he said that he was close to clinching a 30 million-pound deal with Delta to buy three of its aging L-1011s. Remember, the "deal" was to have led to Robertson buying 44 aircraft, instead of three. He boasted "We will have no problem filling our seats. It will be carriers like British Airways who will feel the pinch when we start up. As long as we can conclude this deal with Delta, we will be flying by Easter." But a senior Delta source revealed "The last time this news came out, checked and the reality was we have never actually talked with them. We run up against this sort of thing on a regular basis. It enhances their public perception and, in a lot of cases, enhances negotiations with governments and others to say they are talking with Delta Air Lines." An official Delta spokesman said it was their policy not to identify firms involved in buying aircraft until the deal was complete. But in anyway, they revealed that Robertson was an "unreliable client". Robertson's last HQ was an office at Bujumbura Airport in Burundi. A friend of mine who is involved the airline business said that in the beginning of this year, Robertson came up to him and asked if he could find a job! An airline is nothing without aircraft and employees. I tried writing emails to different departments at Wings Holdings to find out more about Robertson's biography, but surprisingly, all of them were replied by Robertson. Is there anyone who works for Robertson?

Talking more about "aircraft", Robertson reportedly purchased N31023 (msn 1080) from PK Airfinance. This fact is extremely hard to believe, since this aircraft is one of the TriStars which have accumulated the highest hours, having logged 71,299 hours. The aircraft would absolutely need a C-Check. In addition, the aircraft has been stored at Kingman, Arizona since its retirement from Trans World Airlines back in September 1997. A photographer shared with me a recent photo of the aircraft sitting on the desert sands at Kingman, and it did not seem airworthy at all. Asking the sources, they said that they haven't heard of Caledonian Wings, and that the aircraft may have to be scrapped soon, since a new owner could not be found. First of all, from an industry observer's point of view, how effective could acquiring 44 overaged, fuel-thirsty widebodies be for a startup airline, when maintenance fees and fuel cost a fortune these days?

Tracing Neil Robertson's biography, it revealed that he is a failed pilot linked to a trail of broken businesses. He claims to have acquired Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 experience, but according to sources who actually know him, the only genuine pilot he has obtained is a South African PPL and in no ways above that. He is at age 35, and he claims his firm, Caledonian Wings, will pioneer flights from Prestwick International Airport to the USA and Canada. A few weeks ago, he claimed that he was buying L-1011 TriStars which would be flying across the Atlantic by April 2001. But research revealed that the closest Robertson has come to being an airline tycoon was running two clapped-out freight planes from a dusty airstrip in Africa under the name of Africargo Airlines, which was not listed in any airline directories. But, as previously mentioned, Robertson boasted that the airline operated Boeing 747Fs, L-1011Fs and many propliners. And the thing is this even ended up in disaster. Seven months ago, both planes were blown up by explosions which killed more than 100 people. But all of this was flipped over later, as more "truth" started to show from the dark. It came out that both Africargo and City Connexion were "paper" or "internet" airlines. The CL-44, which is reportedly registered 9U-BHI, does have that registration but has never been owned or operated by neither City Connexions nor Robertson. This was revealed by one of the actual owners of the aircraft. The "Sunday Mail" has taken up Robertson many times, and they can also reveal that he, who calls himself "The Guvnor" on PPrune and "Ceilidh" on Airliners Net, has been involved in more than 10 "airlines" - few, if any of which ever made it into the air. According to their information, his bases have included a string of war-torn African countries notorious for diamond and arms smuggling. Robertson, whose only pilot's qualification is a lapsed licence he bought in Nigeria for 60 pounds, returned home to England to set up Caledonian Wings. Plugging the firm on TV and in the Press, he said it would be Scotland's first international airline. Prestwick's managing director, Tom Wilson, was persuaded that the new airline could get off the ground. He said "If it gets the planes and finance to start up, there is no doubt it will work. We would welcome transatlantic flights back with open arms. It would be a major stimulant for the Ayrshire economy." But they also said that "At this stage Caledonian Wings is an idea - so far the company has not yet purchased aircraft from supplier Delta. We hope of course that finance can be raised however until that happens, Prestwick is not involved." And despite publishing ticket prices and advertising for staff, Robertson's airline has no aircraft or pilots whatsoever. The company's "switchboard" is Robertson's mobile phone, while the "office" is his laptop computer. And the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has never heard of him or his firm. On his website, Robertson still claims he will be raising 350 million pounds to buy and overhaul 44 L-1011s.

Robertson has been involved at various levels with "airlines" in Equatorial Guinea, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of Congo. As previously mentiones, the common fact about the areas is that all of them are notorious for its civil wars, corruption and lawlessness. Robertson's firms included City Connexions, SecureAir, FreshAir, TransOceanic, PegasusAir, Lionair, Skymaster Freight, Trans Lloyd Cargo and Africargo Airlines. And not even Africargo operated any aircraft. It was run by Robertson and another of his firms, City Connexions. The two propeller-driven freight planes told to have been operated by Africargo, built in 1961 and 1964, were destroyed, or at least heavily damaged, at Kinshasa Airport in the Democratic Republic of Congo in April anyway. The inferno was blamed on a soldier dropping explosives. At least 100 people died and 200 were injured. Shortly before the catastrophe, Robertson announced that City Connexions were also grounded, blaming it on "political problems". The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said anyone wanting to run an airline in the UK would need both an Air Operating Certificate (AOC) and an Operating Licence. But a CAA spokeswoman said few days ago that they had not been contacted by Caledonian Wings or any other firm Robertson has used for his latest venture - Celtic Airways, Celtic Aviation, Celtic Caledonian, Wings Holdings or the Odyssey Group. Even if they had been contacted, applying for such rights takes more than six months national and an additional four months for international routes. Robertson's plans seem way too premature, don't you think so?

In January 2001, Robertson reported that due to "difficulties", the inaugural flight will not take place until April 2002. But he says that he would take advantage of this period of time making efforts to gain many certificates he needs in order to commence operations. He also says that he has posted the availability of their L-1011s for wet-lease contracts and that the response from the industry was great. Can this be? Even Air Atlanta Icelandic, who is well-known for their ACMI leases, is having some hardships in finding contractors. Later, Robertson released news that he is now ready to place his first TriStar online, which he claims is N31023 (msn 1080), as previously mentioned. He used the wording "ready to rock'n roll", but is the aircraft really going to? Early this year, a representative from an aviation company made a visit to Kingman, Arizona, where N31023 is parked, like most other remaining TriStars which were with Trans World Airlines. He reported that the aircraft was still sitting on sand, missing all of its three engines and many other vital parts, and looking like if it is going to be scrapped soon. According to his report, the aircraft has not been touched for many years. Well, then what did Robertson mean by "rock'n roll"? Is he going to convert the aircraft into a disco or what?

Well, from the points viewed, a man named Neil Robertson is planning to start transatlantic services as Caledonian Wings, but they have no aircraft, no crew, no rights, and they are missing the most important thing of all, cash! Also, as this article points out, there are serious doubts about Robertson's words. It would be a dreams-come-true for us TriStar fans and enthusiasts worldwide, to be able to see 44 L-1011s return to the skies, and it's sure that Scotland would appreciate the development of tourism, but we sure can't hold much hope in this one. Caledonian Wings is likely to end up betraying all our hopes and dreams, turning itself into just a cluster of broken promises...

This article was posted on: April 4, 2001




User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1791 times:

IainHol,

Your credibility on this subject is ZERO, Scottish birdwatching site, my ar5e!!!!

Cyber squatting more like it.

For those who dont know the story, Ceilidh was foolish enough to announce the proposed name of his airline prior to registering the www name. IainHol and his Dad 'somehow' decided to set up a birdwatchers site using this same name. This site isnt in operation and was actually offered for sale back to CalWings.......

You make me sick!


User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1800 times:

Ambasaid - I have categorically never had a lawyer's letter issued to either Johan or PPRuNe; even though I would be perfectly within my rights to do so. There's a fine line between truth and libel - and certain people here (including in particular Freeboot) go well over that line. An ISP or board owner owes a duty to ensure that such libels are not disseminated and is required to delete or at least remove for verification any posting which is identified as such; failing which s/he is liable to be sued for publishing such libel.

That's the law as it stands today - I didn't write it!

Iainhol - FYI, I had breakfast with Freddie Laker this morning, and I mentioned that you claimed his first wife committed suicide after he divorced her. He wasn't exactly pleased by it. And what 'lies', exactly, have you been 'repeatedly told' about the project?


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1785 times:

Ambasaid it is a pity you only know one side of the story, Ceilidh approached us about our Twitcher site, and informed us that he had trademarks going through in the UK, US and Canada. We ran a search on the United States trademark and Patent website, and found no paperwork had been submitted in regards to Calwings. However we did include in the email if he had submitted the paperwork we would be willing to sell it at a fair market value. His response was you have helped uncover some inefficiencies my end. You can interpret that for yourself.

In regards to your allegations about this being classed as Cybersquatting, I got this from cybersquatting.com.

If you own a name with the intent of setting up an e-commerce site or informational database on the Internet, that is totally different. According to Silicon Spin, you could own the domain name www.nike.com, as long as you were using it and not trying to sell it back at a higher price to the famous company. If you had a dog named Nike, you could use that domain name for pictures of your dog. With no problems at all.

After reading that it is obvious that what we have done is not cybersquatting!
Iain


User currently offlineTWAneedsNOhelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

Ambasaid, I actually thought that was the funniest part of it all!

rgds
russ


User currently offlineNicolaki From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1771 times:

Amabasaid: You said

6: The Guv issues a lawyers letter to the bulletin boards owner.
7: The Guv then denies issuing this letter and says that it was a misunderstanding.


I have not heard about this story, could you tell me what happened?

Ceildish:

Cut the legal crap about issuing lawyers letters. Do we have to remind you that YOU went against the rules of this forum by registering 2 usernames and that YOU have deliberatelly (sp?) told lies on this forum to every forum member by using Lawyergal?

Nicolas


User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1777 times:

Iainhol - you're talking complete crap. The remarkable coincidence of you/your dad registering the site after - as Ambasaid rightly said, I foolishly disclosed the new working name before buying up all the DNS names - was indeed cybersquatting. Your Dad offered to sell it to me "at market rates". According to my attorney, the fact that I had already publicly stated that that was the name I intended to use - and that I could demonstrate clear knowledge by you of that intention - plus the fact that your promised 'web cams of Scottish birds' have not transpired and your offer on PPRuNe of caledonianwings.com email addresses demonstrates clear malicious intent; and in his opinion, we'd have a good case against you both.

Luckily for us, you're in Buckinghamshire and come under UK jurisdiction! Big grin Big grin Big grin


User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1773 times:

Nikolai - I have already said why I created the 'Lawyergal' identity, and I don't intend to go into it again. If you think that no one else has more than one identity on here - despite what the rules say - you're remarkably naive.

Also, please ensure that you spell user names correctly. You used two in your post and you managed to get both wrong. It's only common courtesy!


User currently offlineTT737FO From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 472 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

This was, perhaps, the most inciteful and well produced post I have read on airliners.net. Thank you for exposing a simple truth:

CEILIDH IS A FRAUD


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

Ceilidh, My understanding of cybersquatting is what I have written above. This is from a site dedicated to the subject.
In regards to the webcams, as you will notice the site is far from complete. We would certainly like to put webcams up, however these things take time.
About making the site a free-web based e-mail server, this was bought up over dinner, after Brissiie Lion joked about it in the chat. This feature would make the site an everyday stop, rather then make it a one time stop. However this is just an idea, and if we do go through with it, you just like everyone else are more then welcome to sign up!
Iain


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1739 times:

About your chat with Freddie, I find it hard to believe that anyone would bring up such over breakfast. Considering she bought my god-mothers house, and my parents lived in the local area from what we know what I have said is correct.
Iain


User currently offlineJohnnybgoode From Germany, joined Jan 2001, 2187 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

?


If only pure sweetness was offered, why's this bitter taste left in my mouth.
User currently offlineNicolaki From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1729 times:

Yes we all know why you created Lawyergal, because ceilidh had lost all it's credibility.

I would encourage eveybody to read the thread called Caledonian Wings - Come Flap With Me! at http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/337808/ It's reall worth reading especially at the end!!

Sorry for the typos in the usernames but you too make typo, especially in the username field where you confused Ceilidh for Lawyergal hehe  Laugh out loud

Nicolas


User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1721 times:

Iain, please do not try to give us the impression that your intentions were honorable! As for your definition of cyber squatting, I guess that you better ask some of the people in the UK who have used the word "EASY"!

Ceilidh,
Ambasaid - I have categorically never had a lawyer's letter issued to either Johan or PPRuNe; even though I would be perfectly within my rights to do so.

Then what on earth was the Pprune message from Capt Pprune on the 26 September 2000 09:57 all about? Was his interpretation incorrect? Would you care to show us your initial message to clear up any confusion?


User currently offlineNicolaki From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1716 times:

BTW I'm not naive as you said Ceilidh, I know some people have multiple username, however they just have them merely for fun, as you had one to cover your ass. When i post something on here where i make mistake I don't hide myself behind another username. That's the difference Ceilidh.

Nicolas


User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1700 times:

Ambasaid, according to the site, we did nothing wrong! And Ceilidh all our websites are registered and maintain in the US, so it would not fall under UK jurisdiction.  Laugh out loud
Iain


User currently offlineAmbasaid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1686 times:

Well Iain, I guess that the only way we will really know who is right is if Ceilidh sues you!

Now what university are you attending in the UK?


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (13 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1667 times:

Since Ceilidh dragged my name into this, let me first stress that neither myself nor any entity that I have ever been involved with has a business relationship with him beyond casual contacts.

We do have a few mutual acquaintances, who vouch that he does indeed exist and that he does indeed seek funding for random airline projects every few months, but thats all I am willing to say.

My personal interactions with Neil show him to be a somewhat untrustworthy person and I would not enter into any dealings with him without skepticism.


25 N863DA : I agree that Iainhol may not have the most tact and discretion of board members here, but unlike Ceilidh, is not neccesarily a fraud. So he's a bastar
26 Post contains images SegmentKing : Maybe a lesson should be learned... coming from someone who is working on a start-up as well... and the lesson is: your plans SHOULDN'T BE POSTED HERE
27 Post contains images DeltaSFO :
28 Post contains images TT737FO : My personal interactions with Neil show him to be a somewhat untrustworthy person and I would not enter into any dealings with him without skepticism.
29 Iainhol : N863DA As they say 2 out of 3 ain't bad. The You are wrong on the postal code bit. Iain
30 N863DA : Well I was trying to support you, not attack you. Guess I got the wrong website, then.... FLY DELTA JETS and sail UNITED STATES LINES N 8 6 3 D A
31 Post contains images Freeboot : Well, there isn't even a need for me to enter into this discussion!
32 Lsjef : Every network needs a soap opera... ...though I knew absolutely nothing about this matter ten minutes ago, I'd have to commend Ambasaid for his accura
33 Post contains images Ceilidh : N863DA - with all the experience of your many, many years in the business I can see how you'd have that view. FYI, this whole thing was originated 18
34 DeltaSFO : Anybody seen any three engined 777s around?
35 B747-437B : Neil - Unlike you, I don't post emails from folks like Bryan online. And since when was Bryan an authority on what I was authorized to send to you? Al
36 N863DA : >>then the little children like N863DA, Iainhol and Nikolai will end up with egg on their faces
37 Iainhol : Aylesbury is a good guess but it is not even close to where I live. I used to live quite close to there though! GO DUCKS! I will give you a hint thoug
38 Post contains images Ceilidh : B747-437B - as I explained to you at the time, it was simply a matter of verification. If all was as you claimed, then there would have been no proble
39 Post contains images Granite : Hi all This thread is doing OK so please let's keep it civil. Any sign of trouble and it will be locked. This is not a dig at anyone, just an observat
40 Post contains images B747-437B : If all was as you claimed, then there would have been no problem passing it on to another member of the team - except that wasn't the case, was it? Th
41 Post contains images Ceilidh : B747-437 - agreed!
42 Freeboot : Oh well ... - Acceptable for him to obtain a Nigerian ALTP through fraudulent means. - Acceptable to break the BB rules on multiple ID's, to which he
43 SegmentKing : Since when as Aerobanc become such a talking point here... from what I know about them, they are into aircraft leasing, not airline financing.. althou
44 Post contains images EGGD : Guys, whats the point? You can argue all you want but is that going to prove that Neil is in fact a fraud or not? No, So stop your whining Night, EGGD
45 Teahan : Hello, Well me, unlike most of you, I actually believe Ceilidh. At least he is trying to open an airline unlike most of you. How many of you actually
46 Lowfareair : >>- Acceptable to break the BB rules on multiple ID's, to which he agreed each time he registered one of his many alter ego's.
47 Us330 : Fraud/No fraud. Let's just agree to disagree on this topic. Also, I do not think that the judgement of one's character should be up for debate in the
48 CX flyboy : Why does everyone here take all this as a personal attack? Ceilidh has done nothing to us. He is a man with a dream. Regardless of whether it is real,
49 Post contains images B747-437B : Why does everyone here take all this as a personal attack? Ceilidh has done nothing to us. He is a man with a dream. Regardless of whether it is real,
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Check In Time For A Flight In Europe? posted Thu Dec 14 2006 00:19:57 by Aak777
Time For A Good United Rumor posted Thu Nov 30 2006 15:09:26 by MSYtristar
It's Time For UA And CO posted Sat Nov 18 2006 07:24:56 by Lufthansa
TOM Fleet - Time For A Refresher? posted Tue Nov 14 2006 20:16:20 by FCAFLYBOY
Length Of Time For Miles To Post To A FFacct posted Mon Oct 16 2006 05:37:08 by ASTROJET707
Is It Time For Profiling Passengers? posted Thu Aug 17 2006 05:57:48 by Flybynight
Time For A Good Laugh - Aboulafia At Its Best posted Tue Jul 4 2006 16:21:23 by Flying-Tiger
Time For Shopping For EK! posted Thu Jun 22 2006 17:59:33 by PZ707
It's Time For THY To Divorce Worldinfocus! posted Mon Feb 27 2006 18:12:26 by Bahadir
Best Departure Time For Eastbound Longhaul Travel posted Sun Feb 5 2006 19:38:41 by Incitatus