Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Could Pull Tickets From Orbitz  
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5197 posts, RR: 21
Posted (4 years 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 6735 times:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101104/...i_ge/us_american_airlines_orbitz_2

Seems AA's having issues with Orbitz's information gathering resources and wants a tighter reign on those matters. They'll probably come to some sort of deal, if not AA is the one US carrier that can ill afford to lose even marginal revenue with their cost structure.

I haven't booked on Orbitz, but I do utilize their site to compare fares from time to time. If I did see a good deal on AA through them I wouldn't hestitate to book it. AA's loss if they don't work this out.


Next up, STL-ATL-MSY-ATL-STL
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23204 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 6213 times:

Quoting OzarkD9S (Thread starter):
If I did see a good deal on AA through them I wouldn't hestitate to book it.

Isn't (or wasn't) the whole point of Orbitz that the "good deals" are the exact same ones available on airline websites collected in one place?



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineDl767captain From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 6186 times:

I honestly only use orbitz to compare a group of airlines to find the best price. A British airways flight was actually cheaper booking through BA.com. I have however found multicity trips cheaper on orbitz since it puts multiple airlines together

User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5197 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (4 years 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5705 times:

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 1):


Isn't (or wasn't) the whole point of Orbitz that the "good deals" are the exact same ones available on airline websites collected in one place?

Yes, but I have seen some roundabout itineraries offered thru Orbitz (and others) that weren't listed on the individual airline websites, usually involving and extra connection or multiple (unaligned) carriers. Every once in awhile you can find a super cheap offering if you're willing to double connect or switch airlines enroute.



Next up, STL-ATL-MSY-ATL-STL
User currently offlinedavescj From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 2307 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 5571 times:

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 1):
Isn't (or wasn't) the whole point of Orbitz that the "good deals" are the exact same ones available on airline websites collected in one place?
Quoting Dl767captain (Reply 2):
I honestly only use orbitz to compare a group of airlines to find the best price. A British airways flight was actually cheaper booking through BA.com. I have however found multicity trips cheaper on orbitz since it puts multiple airlines together

I would say both these statements are true. I almost always start at my preferred carrier (DL) or use orbitz for a price compare. Orbitz does much more multi-city and multi-carrier gymnastics than many other sites (esp airline websites). Orbitz also allows you to pair depatures and arrivals, if time is your over riding concern (as opposed to price) even from among different companies.

I am surprised AA would leave Orbitz. But then Southwest doesn't use them either. Maybe they know something I do not.

Dave



Can I have a mojito on this flight?
User currently offlineexFATboy From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2974 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3196 times:

I think AA is just considering another way to drive traffic toward their website rather than see that business go through online agencies, similar to their spat with Kayak a while back that led to restrictions on how AA flights are displayed on Kayak - AA flights only direct a purchaser to AA's website, not to Orbitz, Expedia, etc. This also means Kayak won't display routings that mix AA flights with other carriers', even if the routings would come up on Orbitz itself. AA could be losing business from this policy, but apparently they've decided the benefit of driving customers to their website outweigh any marginal loss of business.

It could just be a cost reduction issue, as AA claims, but if so why aren't they threatening to pull their tickets off Expedia and Travelocity as well, or do those services retrieve information directly from AA rather than the GDS?

Or it could be a ploy to get those fees reduced, since Orbitz is half-owned by Travelport, the parent of Worldspan and Galileo.

Quoting davescj (Reply 4):
But then Southwest doesn't use them either. Maybe they know something I do not.

Southwest knows they aren't always the cheapest on any given trip, so they deliberately make it harder for customers to compare their fares to other carriers', by not participating in on-line travel agencies or allowing their fares to be displayed on non-agency search engines like Kayak or Hipmunk.

Not participating in the online agencies is admittedly also a way to reduce expenses by avoiding agency fees, but the search engine suppression is simply to make comparisons harder - WN could feed Kayak directly from their own systems, costing them effectively nothing, and Kayak users would get sent to Southwest.com to buy, just as they do with AA. At least WN is allowing their schedules to be displayed on Kayak so users know to go look on WN's website, they used to not even allow that.


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23204 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3092 times:

Quoting davescj (Reply 4):
I am surprised AA would leave Orbitz. But then Southwest doesn't use them either. Maybe they know something I do not.

Honestly, on most of my travel (and practically all of my business travel), I don't use Orbitz or any other site and I don't really comparison shop. Why? If I fly a route a lot, I know who is cheapest and whose schedules work best, and I don't need any website to tell me that if my return time is up in the air, I need to fly WN so I can change the ticket. I think it's a lot easier for WN to be off of Orbitz, etc. than it would be for AA because WN has a more distinctive product (no change fees, no 1st or 2nd bag fee, all mainline, more of a p2p model, etc.). If I'm going to fly CHI-BNA, for instance, I'm going to pick WN versus AA/UA based on those things and MDW versus ORD. But how do I pick between AA and UA? Unless I'm Elite on one or the other, it's going to be price.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineAirNZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3052 times:

Quoting OzarkD9S (Thread starter):
if not AA is the one US carrier that can ill afford to lose even marginal revenue with their cost structure.

How can you equate revenue from Orbitz ticket sales as 'marginal'? You've surely got to be joking with that!

Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 1):
Isn't (or wasn't) the whole point of Orbitz that the "good deals" are the exact same ones available on airline websites collected in one place?

Nope, there are many other factors in play.


User currently offlinefrmrCapCadet From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1732 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3020 times:

I was told today that WN uses Orbitz for their hotels. When I checked prices for a flight and a week in downtown Chicago it all was pretty comparable.


Buffet: the airline business...has eaten up capital...like..no other (business)
User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8573 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2996 times:

I started using Orbitz when it was first launched and never looked back. It's a lot more convenient than jumping from airline site to airline site comparing fares and schedules. I especially like the ability to mix and match different airlines that you can't get from booking on a single carrier. And Orbitz customer service is a lot better than any legacy carrier's customer service will ever be, and you can't beat their lowest price guarantee which no airline will have give you.

User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4471 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2972 times:

Quoting exFATboy (Reply 5):

Southwest knows they aren't always the cheapest on any given trip, so they deliberately make it harder for customers to compare their fares to other carriers', by not participating in on-line travel agencies or allowing their fares to be displayed on non-agency search engines like Kayak or Hipmunk.

This is something you see more often now that internet has created transparency in certain markets. The companies don't like it and do their best to reduce transparency.....

Odly, the airlines (who want to reduce bookings via a travel agent) give more reasons to go to a travel agent. At present I do my booking entirely via internet, but if sites like Orbitz aren't allowed to offer these kind of fares (and sometimes very interesting routings), the added value of the internet diminishes.

Quoting exFATboy (Reply 5):

It could just be a cost reduction issue, as AA claims, but if so why aren't they threatening to pull their tickets off Expedia and Travelocity as well, or do those services retrieve information directly from AA rather than the GDS?

I don't have any experience for domestic US flights, but on my travels from Amsterdam to Latin America, I found Orbitz much more creative than Travelocity and Expedia (and the latter much more expensive than any other site I know). They provide me with much more options and I end up booking with them most of the time.


User currently offlineexFATboy From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2974 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2966 times:

Quoting AirNZ (Reply 7):
How can you equate revenue from Orbitz ticket sales as 'marginal'? You've surely got to be joking with that!

The "marginal" would only be the loss of customers who are only looking on Orbitz - they aren't checking on any other on-line agent (Expedia, Travelocity), search engine (Kayak, Hipmunk, Sidestep, etc.), and wouldn't go check on AA's website directly. AA could be figuring this is a very small, yet relatively expensive to serve and low-yield, market segment.

They might have a case here - I don't know of that many people who only use one search method when they're looking for tickets, at least not unless it's for a trip they're very familiar with. I only look on Kayak for trips between NYC and Florida destinations, but that's 'cause I've flown to TPA, SRQ, MCO, FLL, and MIA dozens of times in the last few years and have a pretty good idea of what range the fares should be in. Otherwise, I use Kayak and at least one other source, usually Orbitz, and unless I'm buying a multi-carrier ticket always book with the airline directly, getting a final price check.

(When WN expands to EWR and finishes the AirTran acquisition and assimilation, I guess I'll have to start checking their site too.)

Or AA could want just what they're saying they want, for Orbitz to get data directly from them rather than the GDS systems, and the "pull" threat is just a bargaining ploy.


User currently onlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3811 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2896 times:

Travelport just sued AA to stop them from pulling tickets from Orbitz:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-1...-from-ending-orbitz-ticketing.html



"Did he really need the triple bypass? Or was it the miles?"
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5197 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2794 times:

Quoting AirNZ (Reply 7):


How can you equate revenue from Orbitz ticket sales as 'marginal'? You've surely got to be joking with that!

Not joking at all. I have no idea what % of AA's revenues are booked through Orbitz, and would assume that information is not general knowledge though of course I could be wrong. However, disregarding us A-net travel geeks I would probably be correct in assuming a good chunk of people are using Orbitz and others to find the "cheapest" fare possible. How many F and C pax book through Orbitz on AA? Again I have no idea, but AA does and might feel its worth the lost revenue to get a tighter grip on their own bookings. But with AA's spotty quarterly results, while others are raking in profits, it makes me wonder if AA can afford to lose ANY revenue right now.



Next up, STL-ATL-MSY-ATL-STL
User currently onlineFWAERJ From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 3811 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2736 times:

Keep in mind that Orbitz Worldwide also owns CheapTickets.com, Trip.com (a comparison site a la Kayak), and many other travel sites in addition to Orbitz.com.

If AA pulls schedules and flights from Orbitz as of 12/1, it will likely affect all Orbitz-owned sites.



"Did he really need the triple bypass? Or was it the miles?"
User currently offlineairportugal310 From Tokelau, joined Apr 2004, 3681 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2677 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 12):
Travelport just sued AA to stop them from pulling tickets from Orbitz:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-1...-from-ending-orbitz-ticketing.html

Almost seem like something you might see on an episode of Mad Men...

But seriously, I am sure AA's legal team reviewed the contract. Of course that hasn't ever stopped anyone from suing before, but it might just be to buy Travelport some time...

This line from the Bloomberg report:

"Travelport, whose affiliate owns 48 percent of Orbitz’s stock, would suffer substantial harm if American stops providing fare data to Orbitz...

is not AA's problem?  



I sell airplanes and airplane accessories
User currently offlineairbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8573 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (4 years 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2570 times:

Quoting exFATboy (Reply 11):
They might have a case here - I don't know of that many people who only use one search method

Me. Like I said above, I only use Orbitz and hardly ever bother wasting my time looking anywhere else. The assumption is that if it's not on Orbitz it's not anywhere else since all sites get their data from the same place. And even if an airline site may have a slightly cheaper fare (which almost never happens), the difference is not going to be significant enough to make it worth my time.
My wife is a travel agent with access to cheaper, negotiated agent [net] rates from the airlines (those that still do that), and those fares are never significantly different than what I can find on Orbitz.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JetBlue $10 Tickets From/to JFK. posted Mon Mar 8 2010 11:49:44 by FXramper
UA And AA Threaten To Walk From ORD Expansion Talk posted Tue Feb 9 2010 17:51:26 by 777fan
AA BOS-LHR Going From 763 To 757 posted Sat Oct 10 2009 19:39:13 by 747fan
Who Will Pull Flying From Republic First? posted Thu Sep 24 2009 14:34:08 by FWAERJ
"Israeli Airlines Could Be Barred From The U.S" posted Tue Jul 15 2008 10:54:17 by TodaReisinger
How Far Could A A319 Get From DET? posted Tue Mar 4 2008 15:31:23 by MOBflyer
AA Diversion To EWR From JFK posted Mon Dec 10 2007 12:26:55 by Apodino
Buying Int'l Tickets From Origin Vs. Destination posted Tue Oct 23 2007 14:53:42 by AT
AA To Pull Out Of SNN posted Wed May 23 2007 00:07:09 by LIPZ
AA Applies ORD-EZE From 28OCT07 posted Tue Apr 3 2007 23:02:13 by Jimyvr