Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas Slams SIA  
User currently offlineWirraway From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 1
Posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1387 times:

QANTAS SLAMS SIA BUT AIR NZ HAPPY

SIA's second push for a larger stake in troubled Air NZ was expected to meet strong resistance from nationalistic factions within New Zealand, Australia and competing airlines.

Qantas protested loudly late on Tuesday.

"This is an attempt by Singapore Airlines, which is controlled by the Singapore government, to take an unprecedented level of influence over the competitiveness and structure of the aviation industry on both sides of the Tasman," Qantas chief executive officer Geoff Dixon said.

Dixon said people should realise this would give SIA major influence over the future of Air NZ, Ansett and Ansett International, in addition to its 49 percent stake in Virgin Atlantic [VA.UL].

But the board of Air NZ welcomed SIA's proposal, saying it was in the best interests of the company to strengthen the Air NZ-Ansett Australia airline group as an integrated business.

"As a consequence, the expansion of the capital base of the Air NZ-Ansett Australia group will be pursued," Jim Farmer, acting chairman of Air NZ said in a statement.

Farmer said an integrated Australasian network was more valuable than any other option available.



28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineStar_member From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 185 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1262 times:

poor geoff dixon showing his own anxiety at being beaten at his own game. the fact is both sq and qf has ambitions of regional dominance. finger pointing is so unbecoming - an example of the pot calling the kettle black

User currently offlineThe Coachman From Australia, joined Apr 2001, 1425 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1247 times:

Geoff Dixon appeared very cold and callous in a 4 Corners Documentary. It seems SQ is equally cold. To QF fans anyway. To AN fans, QF is as cold as the Antarctic and SQ the tropics.

I'm not tipping my hand as to who I support.

 Smile

The Coachman



M88, 722, 732, 733, 734, 73G, 73H, 742, 743, 744, 752, 762, 763, 772, 773, 77W, 320, 332, 333, 345, 388, DH8, SF3 - want
User currently offlineMiami1 From Australia, joined Feb 2001, 706 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1236 times:

When it gets down to reality. Qf or SQ dont give a damn who they own as long as they are making money, after all its a business RIGHT! I can imagaine that if the roles where reversed and it was NZ or AN with all the money and clout they would be doing exactly the same. The only real losers are the employees who have to put up with all the cut backs to keep their highlypaid executives in comfy air conditioned offices.

User currently offlineJubilee777 From Singapore, joined May 1999, 528 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1220 times:

Hmm.....

what can i say.....

SORE LOSER!

The Singapore government thingie is just an excuse....what else can they say ?


Now the REAL threat is about to begin......

J777
(I love every bit of this drama Big grin )


User currently offlineAirnewzealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2542 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1169 times:

Qantas is going DOWN!! That is all i can say!!

Cheers
mikey

PS AirNZ and AN are going to be the real winners!! They are going to Flourish, and guess what... In the plan, it said that SQ is going to expand AirNZ to great lengths, toi get its name seen more, and its world class service appreciated by everyone! Some with AN!!

Cheers once again!!


User currently offlineWirraway From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1162 times:

Airnewzealand

Your right, Qantas shares went down 8% today,
trouble is Air NZ went down 18%.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Wirraway


User currently offlineAirnewzealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2542 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1159 times:

hahahaha....lol wirrawey!!

Have a great day!
Cheers
mikey


User currently offlineMEA From Australia, joined Jan 2001, 631 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1159 times:

I would prefer Air NZ linking up with QF over SQ any day. This would allow QF & NZ to become a formidable force in Asia & the Pacific.

SQ's purchase of AN will allow AN to grow & compete on par with a combined QF/NZ company.

For some reason, I just don't think that NZ has what it takes to make AN the carrier it should be. Capital isn't everything if you can't run the company properly. NZ has had ample time to fix things up @ Ansett & this does not seem to be happening.


User currently offlineKrisworldB777 From Australia, joined Nov 2000, 570 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1156 times:

I really don't view SQ as a cold airline, they certainly want to make money, but that is the purpose of business today isn't it? I too watched the Four Corners program and was completely unimpressed with Geoff Dixon's persona: certainly an extremely arrogant guy and it really is affected in Qantas Cabin Service. I have no respect for Dixon, nor James Strong at all.

I do have a huge amount of respect for SIA's Dr. Cheong Choong Kong, a man who has done remarkable things for the airline, but also the aviation industry in general making him one of the most influential members of the aviation community. Dr. Cheong isn't a cold man, he is extremely clever and very respected with a lot of personal charm. I'm still yet to see Dixon's charm!

Australians do, however, have concerns about the Singapore Government ruling the Pacific airlines but, SIA has built a reputation so outstanding that both Air New Zealand and Ansett are sure to flourish under. Qantas really do not have the capital or the management style to make a happy and highly successful airline.


User currently offlineRAAFController From Australia, joined May 2001, 125 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1149 times:

What happened to SIA's statement that they wished to have a 'controlling stake' in AN?

The papers this morning, and articles on other posts today, claimed that ANZ had rejected both QF and SIA proposals, in that the SIA proposal had them buying more of ANZ and some of AN!

Now it seems that people are saying ANZ has gone with the SIA proposal.

Am I missing something here? or is it media who are distorting things as usual?

As i understand it, the present proposal is that SIA buy more of ANZ by purchasing shares at $1.30 or something. But not buying any of AN?

Please explain???


User currently offlineWirraway From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1143 times:

Wednesday June 20, 4:02 PM

Howard to Hear QANTAS Concerns Over Ansett Ownership
CANBERRA, June 20 Asia Pulse - Australian Prime Minister John Howard today said he would meet senior Qantas (ASX:QAN) executives over the coming weeks to hear their concerns about the future ownership of domestic rival Ansett Airlines.
Mr Howard met Qantas officials overnight for general talks about regional airline ownership.




The prime minister said the government would consider the national interest in any change of Ansett's ownership which could result in a push by Singapore Airlines to buy Ansett's parent Air New Zealand.

"The future ownership arrangements of airlines in the region is quite important to the government," Mr Howard told reporters.

"We'll make any decisions we're asked to make on the basis of Australia's national interests, which is always upper most in our minds.

"But it is too early at this stage to say what might eventuate and how we might respond.

"Qantas is obviously concerned and I want to hear what those concerns are.

"We certainly want to listen very carefully to any arguments that Qantas puts.

"Qantas is a great Australian flag carrier. It is a beacon to this country in terms of overseas travel.

"And we certainly want to see the legitimate interests of Qantas protected whilst respecting the fact that people make commercial decisions, and it is not the role of the government to get in the way of those decisions."

Mr Howard said it was not the role of the government to get in the way of commercial decisions unless there was a strong national interest involved.

He said Australia wanted as much competition as possible.



User currently offlineStar_member From Australia, joined Dec 2000, 185 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1137 times:

all i can say is QF are sore losers and geoff dixon is like a spoiled child not getting his way. he may have conquered impulse airlines but singapore airlines ceo is more than his match. i can't believe he has gone running to the australian govt to intervene so quickly, just like a child running to mummy and daddy. quite unprofessional behaviour i think.

User currently offlineV Jet From Australia, joined May 1999, 719 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1128 times:

Would it be too much for you to admit that Qantas must be at least somewhat successful? If it wasnt it would not be operating!

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13738 posts, RR: 19
Reply 14, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1120 times:

I think it is very hypocritical of Geoff whatever to go running to the authorities. Imagine this. If QF won, they would be dominating. To cut a long story short. QF "lost" the battle with SIA, and the kangaroo is going to the first-aid box.

I second what KrisWorldB777 has already said.

What is also important is that SIA are investing 500 Million USD into the ANZ Group, mainly on fleet replacement. Also, don't forget the Celestars going to AN. I think the Australian homeland will be invaded shortly by SIA.

And actually, face it. Why is Geofffy running the authoriites? Shouldn't he be going to ANZ to make them look over the deal again? Not good PR with ANZ. What chance with them now? As much chance as me having BA as my favo(u)rite airline. Normally I would give people credit for being so persistent, but this time I won't/

Of course SIA is a business and it must make money. Cheong wouldn't have done this if there wasn't something for SIA (and also ANZ / AN as well). Poor them, must be in yoyo world. Anyway, SIA with the help of ANZG are going to make the three a formidable force in the A-P region and what does this mean? Lower prices and in the case of AN and ANZ, better planes.

Virgin Blue: ?/
Impulse: No where

Time will tell really. Although I'm excited, it will take ages for this deal to go through. Bloody Bureaucracy. ANyway,

"It would be unprecedented for the Singapore government to control its own airline, Singapore Airlines, as well as Air New Zealand, Ansett Australia and Ansett International. This would not happen in any other part of the world," said Geoff Dixon, Qantas chief executive. (Good for them)

Mr Howard said he would be holding further talks with Qantas' management and that he wanted the airline's "legitimate interests" to be protected.

"Qantas is obviously concerned. I want to hear what their concerns are," he said.

But he added that the government was also interested in maximising competition and did not aim to become involved in commercial decisions unless there was a strong national interest."



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineQANTASforever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1098 times:

I find it most uncomforting to hear you all speak of airlines like they are countries oppressing the population. It seems to me that most of you do not realise that these organisations are there to make money, not friends. How can you possibly make an airline such as QANTAS to appear cold and clinical purely by a recent interview with the CEO?? Dixon is a businessman, he makes money so his shareholdes are happy and so he can pay his employees, If he was "nice and charismatic" and perhaps didnt run the airline as well, 26,000 employees would be looking for a job. Cant you people just face the fact that Qantas is here to stay and stop ridiculing it just because it is on the top.


And another thing, it was the Australian Government that stepped in on this issue by itself, its not like what was nievely written; Dixon goes to the australian government like a child to its parents.


A lot of people here need to pick on an airline their own size, I tend to think however, if Qantas was smaller, it wouldnt be picked on at all. Its the truth and you all know it.


User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 16, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1085 times:

I totally agree with QANTASforever.

alvin



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineV Jet From Australia, joined May 1999, 719 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1084 times:

Will be interesting to see in the future if necessary who N.Z. will go running to for defence assistance. Aust Govt. or Singapore Govt. Did'nt N.Z. recently scrap their air force to rely on Australias capabilities. Hmmmm I'm sure someone will correct me if my last statement is incorrect. SQ is one of the most un-coperative airlines I have had to deal with. If this goes thru I sincerely hope they dont decimate Air New Zealand with their attitude. NZ is too good an airline for that to happen to.

User currently offlineRAAFController From Australia, joined May 2001, 125 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1076 times:

V Jet,

Yes, NZ did 'scrap' their air force....well the combat components anyway. They still have some transport aircraft, but not much.

As for relying on Aust Capabilities, I don't think you would get them to admit that, its more a case of them claiming there is no direct threat, so no need for an airforce. And in all honesty, their previous 10 combat aircraft wouldn't have done much anyway


User currently offlineWirraway From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1052 times:

From what I've read there appears to be no reason
at this stage that Air NZ could not sell a direct stake
in Ansett to SIA at a later date, unless the NZ govt
made that a stipulation for giving SIA a bigger shareholding in ANZ.

Wirraway


User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13738 posts, RR: 19
Reply 20, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1046 times:

No new comments on this so far from me  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineQantas737 From Australia, joined Jul 2000, 738 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1031 times:

Qantas is going down?!?!?!? What kind of childish comment is that? It's sad to see posts like this in the forums. There is no reason to be bias. You should also take note that over 450 jobs were lost when Queensland regional airline Flight West Airlines went into voluntary liquidation 2 days ago. This was due to Qantas being knocked back. If Qantas was able to get hold of AirNZ, then SQ would have taken over Ansett and increased their funds greatly which would have allocated more funds to help the regionals that Ansett overlook.

User currently offlineTullamarine From Australia, joined Aug 1999, 1514 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1022 times:

Qantas737, your remark that the collapse of YC is in anyway related to the proposal by QF or SQ to increase stakes in NZ is absolute rubbish. In fact YC had gone into liquidation prior to NZ's board meeting being completed and an announcement made.

The competitive environment in regional Australia has meant that YC is unable to continue profitable operations. AN had absolutely no equity participation in YC. It was wholly owned by Dennis Buchanan. AN had a commercial relationship with YC only.



717,721/2,732/3/4/5/7/8/9,742/3/4,752/3,762/3,772,W,A310,320,321,332,333,388,DC9,DC10,F28,F100,142,143,E90,CR2,D82/3/4,S
User currently offlineQantasAirways From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1277 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1017 times:

INDEED, there is no reason the bias.
In no way (through my opinion) is Geoff Dixon a sore loser. He is simply reacting the way most other CEO's would at a big oppurtunity like that.

Unfortunately, I do not support Singapore Airlines (being one of my favourite carriers) in their move. And along with somebody else in this forum, I agree that seeing Qantas linked with Air New Zealand would make me much more satisfied.
However, SIA have made the move they think is best, and I certainly hope that this damned move is worth an Australian carrier surrendering its sovereignty to a larger airline.
Helping an already large airline grow is a terrible move for the smaller carriers, and they have indeed surrendered themselves to Singapore Airlines (in a friendly way ofcourse)



Spirit of Australia
User currently offlineWirraway From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1321 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1006 times:

Qantas737
Tullamarine is absolutely correct that Flight Wests
demise had nothing at all to with SIA/QF, FYI Flight
West has been on the market for a long time, but
unfortunatly no buyer could be found.

Wirraway


25 Airnewzealand : Why does everyone thing that "Qantas is going down" is some sort of childish Comment?? You guys weren't saying that when youse (Qantas fans) were domi
26 BruneiAir : "You guys weren't saying that when youse (Qantas fans) were dominatiing were you now?" First of all, Didn't your mother ever tell you that 'two wrongs
27 Airnewzealand : I except your opinion, and it is a very good one at that!! My mother did tell me that, but when you are so Fustrated and Angry at these people, that b
28 Jubilee777 : Nothing much has changed in SIA's position since it first bought into Air NZ. SIA has all along maintained that it wanted a bigger stake in the New Ze
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Qantas Jet Nearly Slams Into Mountain posted Wed Sep 22 2004 03:13:33 by 777ER
Qantas Wants Equity Partner | SIA Talk Rekindled posted Wed Sep 25 2002 08:46:09 by Singapore_Air
SIA Sabotages Qantas Capital Raising posted Fri Sep 6 2002 07:41:16 by QANTASpower
Article:Virgin-SIA 'most Likely Qantas Competitor' posted Thu Mar 7 2002 09:07:32 by Singapore_Air
Lew Slams Blood-sucking Qantas posted Tue Dec 4 2001 07:09:45 by Wirraway
Qantas May Launch No-frills Airline In Wake Of SIA posted Thu Jun 21 2001 12:32:05 by QantasAirways
Qantas To Challenge SIA posted Wed Jun 20 2001 12:39:56 by Wirraway
Qantas 747-400 Makes Emergency Landing In Perth posted Wed Sep 2 2009 01:52:57 by Slats
Qantas Passenger 'tried' To Open Door Mid-flight posted Tue Aug 25 2009 20:30:50 by Slats
Qantas Profit Plunge posted Wed Aug 19 2009 06:15:47 by Slats