Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
OneWorld To Move Headquarters To NYC  
User currently offlinecrosswinds21 From Netherlands, joined Jun 2009, 698 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9401 times:

It's been discussed here many times that YVR is an odd location for OW to have its HQ, especially given the fact that virtually no OW airlines fly there. Well, it looks like they are finally going to move to NYC (Manhattan). This should be a good move to a city that is a cornerstone of the OW alliance and will hopefully give the alliance much greater exposure.

http://www.thestreet.com/story/10944...airline-exec-to-lead-oneworld.html

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1801 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9468 times:

What was the rationale behind having OW's HQ in YVR to begin with?

User currently offlineAirCanadaA330 From Canada, joined Aug 2008, 276 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9460 times:

Nice to see they are moving, I always found it odd that they Stayed in Vancouver for so long since there is no Canadian member of OW....well not anymore....


Cheers;
User currently offlineLONGisland89 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 708 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9463 times:

Did it have anything to do with Canadian Airlines? They were one of the original founders of Oneworld.

User currently offlineSCL767 From Chile, joined Feb 2006, 8604 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9274 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting EricR (Reply 1):
What was the rationale behind having OW's HQ in YVR to begin with?

A. Vancouver/YVR is considered "neutral" in that it is not a major hub for any of the alliances.
B. Vancouver's time zone permits business to be conducted between the oneworld alliance itself, and its respective members all over the globe during the business day in both locations.


According to CX in 2000, "Vancouver was chosen as the base for the team as a convenient crossroads for oneworld members and to underline the alliance’s commitment to continue to offer the Canadian market choice and high quality services."
http://www.cathaypacific.com/cpa/en_...0706caa010VgnVCM22000022d21c39____


User currently offlineUnited1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5815 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9206 times:

Quoting SCL767 (Reply 6):
A. Vancouver/YVR is considered "neutral" in that it is not a major hub for any of the alliances.

YVR is ACs Pacific hub...



Semper Fi - PowerPoint makes us stupid.
User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11116 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9139 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 1):
What was the rationale behind having OW's HQ in YVR to begin with?

Several things.

1. It was a hub for Canadian Airlines, which was a founding oneworld member.

2. It was, indeed, at the time considered a "neutral" market since back then no other alliance had a major hub there (pre-Canadian takeover, Air Canada's presence in Vancouver was sizable but not nearly as big as today).

3. Because of Vancouver's location and timezone, at the time, it allowed employees at the OMC (oneworld Management Company) in Vancouver to have conference calls with all the alliance member airlines' headquarters simultaneously during normal working hours in those airlines' headquarters cities.


User currently offlineRedChili From Norway, joined Jul 2005, 2179 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 8961 times:

Add MX to the Oneworld airlines flying to YVR.


Top 10 airplanes: B737, T154, B747, IL96, T134, IL62, A320, MD80, B757, DC10
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24061 posts, RR: 22
Reply 8, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 8588 times:

Quoting United1 (Reply 7):
Quoting SCL767 (Reply 6):
A. Vancouver/YVR is considered "neutral" in that it is not a major hub for any of the alliances.

YVR is ACs Pacific hub...
Quoting commavia (Reply 8):
Quoting EricR (Reply 1):
What was the rationale behind having OW's HQ in YVR to begin with?

Several things.

1. It was a hub for Canadian Airlines, which was a founding oneworld member.

2. It was, indeed, at the time considered a "neutral" market since back then no other alliance had a major hub there (pre-Canadian takeover, Air Canada's presence in Vancouver was sizable but not nearly as big as today).

3. Because of Vancouver's location and timezone, at the time, it allowed employees at the OMC (oneworld Management Company) in Vancouver to have conference calls with all the alliance member airlines' headquarters simultaneously during normal working hours in those airlines' headquarters cities.

Oneworld's original executive director, Peter Buecking, was also a Vancouver native. He spent quite a few years with CX, eventually winding up as their director of marketing and sales in HKG, when he resigned to head up oneworld. As a sidenote, he worked for Canadian Airlines predecessor CP Air when he resigned to join CX. He had two brothers who also worked for CP at the same time, all 3 in marketing and sales-related positions in YVR.

[Edited 2010-12-10 14:41:54]

User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11116 posts, RR: 62
Reply 9, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 8486 times:

Anyone who goes back and reads my posts from when LAN-TAM was announced, I expressed my belief that it was basically a 50/50 shot between oneworld and Star. I could - and still can - see arguments and obvious attractions for both alliances (can't see any real rationale for SkyTeam).

However, it is my belief that two events which have occurred since that initial announcement, namely (1) Avianca-TACA joining Star and (2) U.S.-Brazilian Open Skies, have fundamentally changed the competitive landscape and dynamic between oneworld and Star - in oneworld's favor.

On (1), I still contend that it is extremely difficult to imagine LAN joining the same alliance as Avianca. They simply overlap in too many strategically important markets - namely in and out of Peru, and soon Columbia, plus perhaps eventually Brazil (depending on the fate of Avianca Brasil's eventual inclusion in Star). As for (2), as I and others have said, LAN-TAM would likely be salivating at the prospect of getting ATI (and possibly a JV) with AA in the U.S.-Brazil market, which would allow that grouping to combined dominate the market with probably 55-60% of the total market (after Open Skies growth by competitors). Even if they have to wait five years for it - which doesn't really count "against" oneworld per se since it will be the case for any U.S. partner - that is still a massive inducement for LAN-TAM towards oneworld in my view.

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 17):
As a sidenote, he had two brothers who both worked for Canadian Airlines (and predecessor CP Air) in YVR, both in marketing and sales-related positions.

Plus, Don Carty - the then-Chairman and CEO of American, was also a Canadian by birth and also the former President of Canadian Airlines.

[Edited 2010-12-10 23:05:24 by SA7700]

User currently offlineA320boy From UK - England, joined Jun 2010, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 8463 times:

I think he meant no Canadian based airline in OW

User currently offlineheathrow From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2005, 967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 6749 times:

They may not have as many daily flights as other locations, but there presence is there none the less.

Quoting EricR (Reply 1):
What was the rationale behind having OW's HQ in YVR to begin with?
Quoting LONGisland89 (Reply 3):
Did it have anything to do with Canadian Airlines? They were one of the original founders of Oneworld

  

CP was one of the founding members of Oneworld if I'm not mistaken.


It does make sense that I't moving to NYC though. I would have thought LON might be a better HQ though...

[Edited 2010-12-11 00:34:04 by SA7700]

User currently offlineb707forever From United States of America, joined Dec 2007, 459 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 4210 times:

NYC makes a lot of sense and forces AA folks back to NYC after leaving toward the end of the 70s for the greener and cheaper pastures of DFW as HQ. I'm sure the non-revving on IB now will be a bit tougher into MAD though... I hope AA keeps their frequency to MAD up!

User currently offlinecommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11116 posts, RR: 62
Reply 13, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 4135 times:

Quoting b707forever (Reply 12):
NYC makes a lot of sense and forces AA folks back to NYC after leaving toward the end of the 70s

AA's headquarters moved, but AA never left.

AA has maintained a continual office presence in New York - with a substantial staff - for nearly 80 years. For decades, AA's New York office was at the Chrysler Building, and then moved a few years back to a building closer to Grand Central. Now it appears to be moving again, to the consolidated New York offices for AA, BA, Iberia, the headquarters for the Joint Venture, and for oneworld.


User currently offlineLipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11365 posts, RR: 59
Reply 14, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 4135 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting crosswinds21 (Thread starter):
It's been discussed here many times that YVR is an odd location for OW to have its HQ, especially given the fact that virtually no OW airlines fly there. Well, it looks like they are finally going to move to NYC (Manhattan). This should be a good move to a city that is a cornerstone of the OW alliance and will hopefully give the alliance much greater exposure.

As a corporation that demands a lot of international travel, yes it make sense to be in a city with more availability of services. NYC with no doubt have a better balance of Asia, Latin America and Europe.



New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !
User currently offlineAirNZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 4069 times:

Quoting b707forever (Reply 12):
NYC makes a lot of sense and forces AA folks back to NYC

How exactly does it do that?


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7523 posts, RR: 43
Reply 16, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 3320 times:

Quoting RedChili (Reply 7):

Add MX to the Oneworld airlines flying to YVR.

It was. MX is no longer operating.



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineAABB777 From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 505 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 2837 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting commavia (Reply 13):
Now it appears to be moving again, to the consolidated New York offices for AA, BA, Iberia, the headquarters for the Joint Venture, and for oneworld.

Anybody know where the new office will be located in Manhattan?


User currently offlineDFWEagle From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1070 posts, RR: 9
Reply 18, posted (3 years 4 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 2828 times:

Quoting AABB777 (Reply 17):
Anybody know where the new office will be located in Manhattan?

They have secured one floor of the 2 Park Avenue building.

http://www.2parkave.com/

[Edited 2010-12-11 15:42:03]


Ryan / HKG
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JetBlue CEO Talks To Crist About Move To Orlando posted Tue Jan 19 2010 20:23:33 by Oceanic
Boeing Move To Chicago And Possibly Farther East posted Sat Jan 2 2010 22:52:06 by Lrinearson
Will BA's LHR SIN/BKK SYD Route Ever Move To T5? posted Fri Oct 30 2009 06:07:43 by ClubWorld1986
Boeing To Move To China? posted Mon Aug 31 2009 19:14:43 by Clickhappy
Delta To Consolidate Gates At DCA; NW To Move To B posted Sun Jul 26 2009 08:21:38 by Rjpieces
NW Move To Terminal 5 At LAX?s posted Wed Jul 1 2009 19:57:44 by Uclax
CO @ CVG Move To Terminal 2 posted Sun May 17 2009 19:15:03 by IAD51FL
When Does Swiss Move To LHR T1? posted Tue May 5 2009 09:22:41 by Airlineanorak
Dreamliner One Move To The Paint Hangar posted Mon Apr 27 2009 12:48:43 by Mattcawby
JetBlue Considers Move To LAX From LGB posted Wed Apr 1 2009 10:08:26 by LAXintl