Northwest727 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 491 posts, RR: 1 Posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 19068 times:
I put "Continental" in quotations, as the media source cites CO, even though we all know that CO is retired, its now UA. Unless of course, we are still talking about the independently operating companies right now...
Quote: Continental Airlines comes up with new fee
DALLAS — Continental Airlines says it will let passengers hold a reservation and lock in a quoted ticket price for up to a week — all for a new fee.
The offer, called FareLock, will give travelers three days or a week extra while they can decide whether to buy the ticket or let the reservation expire.
offloaded From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2009, 804 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 18878 times:
I don't know about online reservations, as I always use a travel agent, but I know most itineraries either starting in the US or containing US domestic sectors they can only every guarantee for 24 hrs, compared to over here where 3 - 7 days (or more if the fare is a higher category) is more normal.
I can't decide if this is genius or the biggest rip off I've ever heard. I'm thinking "genius" as if the itinerary is already built in the system the airline will actually save time in many cases where fares have expired and staff would have to build itineraries again.
I think calling most airlines in the US is still free though right, even if you are charged a booking fee? That's got to be the next fee - take out the 800 numbers, make them 900 / 976 and charge $2.99 a minute! Employees could get a bonus for keeping clients on the phone for longer.
To no one will we sell, or deny, or delay, right or justice - Magna Carta, 1215
LAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5085 posts, RR: 48 Reply 2, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 18478 times:
It's a modest fee in the range of $5 to $9. From the passenger's perspective, you are buying an option which allows you to keep looking for cheaper fares during the 3-7 day farelock period. It also allows you to cancel your trip for a small fee, which I would have liked on my last booking. I hope more airlines follow suit.
ssides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 22 Reply 4, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 18247 times:
This isn't a new fee, it's a new service. It's just like purchasing a stock option. My guess is that most travelers would jump at the chance to lock in a fare -- with no obligation to purchase the ticket -- for such a small fee.
This may seem like a minor quibble to the OP, but I would have said "Continental Comes Up With a New Service". It doesn't bother me if CO creates something new and charges for it. I think that's great and they deserve to be compensated for a new feature. "A new fee" implies they are adding a fee without adding any new features which I hate. If you have an IPhone app for free and they offer a "Pro" version for $5 that adds real time info or some other cool offering, I expect them to charge for that.
So, basically I'm saying don't complain about a "fee" if it accompanies a new service. Then you are just discouraging advancement in the industry.
Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 2): It's a modest fee in the range of $5 to $9.
That's the minimum. If you try to use it close in to departure, it can be a lot more.
acey559 From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1452 posts, RR: 2 Reply 7, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 17787 times:
I like the idea. I was thinking about something like this a little while ago when I was looking to book a reward ticket on DL, because it gave me the option to save the itinerary at the selected mileage level for 24 hours. For price sensitive shoppers, this seems like a good deal, and it's not like it really costs the airline much, so they'll take all the money they gain from this.
ChopChop767 From Italy, joined Aug 2010, 226 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 15891 times:
I would think that smaller companies that have a lot of travelers, or perhaps even your large corporate accounts, might utilize the service. Certainly, this will be cheaper than Y fares, and it might be better to pay a $50 hold for tickets for EWR to ORD, than it would be to pay $900 for a ticket and have it fully refundable. Personally, I would rather pay for the hold fee for a possible trip than book a pricey full fare refundable ticket. Great move!
bjorn14 From Norway, joined Feb 2010, 3015 posts, RR: 2 Reply 16, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 15323 times:
If I want to get the lowest fare and there are several "holds" on that fare which forces me to buy a higher priced ticket and the holds subsequently get released then I kind of get ripped off. Correct? Good for CO/UA, bad for me.
"An idea has to be incredibly absurd to have any reasonable chance of succeeding" --A. Einstein
golfradio From Canada, joined Jun 2009, 667 posts, RR: 2 Reply 17, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 15109 times:
Quoting bjorn14 (Reply 16): If I want to get the lowest fare and there are several "holds" on that fare which forces me to buy a higher priced ticket and the holds subsequently get released then I kind of get ripped off. Correct?
No, you are guaranteed the price and the itinerary until the expiry. If you got a farelock, you are guaranteed a ticket till the lock expires. Under the hood, they might limit the number of holds to the number of seats available for that price. It's a win-win situation. If you do not buy then CO can release the seat at a higher price and also make a small profit. The fee might probably have been the yield on that ticket to start with.
MSPNWA From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 1732 posts, RR: 3 Reply 18, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 14817 times:
I think this is a great service. It would have saved me about 65 dollars the last time I bought a ticket. I wasn't ready to book quite yet, and by the time I was ready the price went up. And the best part of this "fee" is that it's entirely optional.
YULWinterSkies From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2144 posts, RR: 6 Reply 19, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 14732 times:
Air France USA does it for $20, for reservations held up to a week. I think it's great when there's a sweet deal around on one specific day/flight but final travel plans still need to be made.
On a, say, $800 international ticket, this $20 is worth it, if you start seeing fares on next/previous day being already 200-300 higher (that happens a lot).
SFO2SVO From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 396 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 14373 times:
Agreed, as long as this fee stays under $20, that's one new fee (ok, service which comes with it) I actually welcome.
Comes very handy when you're coordinating several people coming from different places.
ikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21313 posts, RR: 60 Reply 21, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 14294 times:
I don't defend new fees for things you could previously do for free, but if there is a new service that is adding value and is reasonably priced, I'm not against it. Currently, only FF tickets have this longer hold period, while purchased tickets have no hold.
I think this sounds like a good program. Currently, only elites can cancel without penalty, and it's within 24 hours, and it involves a credit to your account that can take a while.
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
jpyvr From Canada, joined Jan 2000, 121 posts, RR: 0 Reply 22, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 14257 times:
Sure beats charging for carry-on luggage. For this $9 the traveler (or potential traveler) actually receives something that he or she didn't have before starting the booking - a reservation and a fare that are guaranteed for a period of time. I'm definitely with on "you go, CO" crowd on this new fee or service or whatever you want to call it.
airbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 7471 posts, RR: 11 Reply 23, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 13942 times:
Quoting golfradio (Reply 17): Quoting bjorn14 (Reply 16):
If I want to get the lowest fare and there are several "holds" on that fare which forces me to buy a higher priced ticket and the holds subsequently get released then I kind of get ripped off. Correct?
No, you are guaranteed the price and the itinerary until the expiry. If you got a farelock, you are guaranteed a ticket till the lock expires.
I think he's making a different point which I agree. Lets say I want to book a flight today but all the lower fares are on hold by prospective customers who are still shopping around. Bu tI know that I need to travel "tomorrow" so I go ahead and fully book for the next available fare which is likely to be higher than some of those that are on hold. In other words, customers who have a rigid schedule are screwed by those who are able to hold on for a few days until they make up their mind.
At first this sounds like a great idea, but in the end all it means is higher fares for most people due to the lower fares being constantly "on hold", and additional revenue for the airline for both, selling me a higher fare that what's "actually available", and charging somebody else a fee for a ticket they'll eventually buy anyway
Genious for the airline, crappy for the consumer.
mogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 24, posted (2 years 12 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 13375 times:
Quoting airbazar (Reply 23): Bu tI know that I need to travel "tomorrow" so I go ahead and fully book for the next available fare which is likely to be higher than some of those that are on hold. In other words, customers who have a rigid schedule are screwed by those who are able to hold on for a few days until they make up their mind.
The only people i imagine still holding for TOMORROW's ticket are travel agents who are perpetuity holding inventory in hopes of selling higher fare bucket to their clients and earning a higher commission.
For most, it's simply consumers paying a tiny insurance fee so they can think through their travel plans (e.g. hold it first, then ask boss for permission for days off)
In this world of non-refundable non-cancellable non-changeable no-routing-change no-name-change no-date-change no-flight-time-change tickets (okay i'm exaggerating here ), $5 is a tiny fee for a peace of mind (esp that this fee actually adds value as opposed to some stupid $45 carry-on fee or some $1 toilet fee)
kudos to CO
25 enilria: Almost all changes are made within the last two weeks before the flight. They are not charging $5/9 for changes in that timeframe. The fees are much
26 r2rho: The thread title is misleading. This is a new service, and as such, is charged at a price. It is not a "new fee" for a previously free service, as the
27 einsteinboricua: I like the idea and would use it. Just last week I was searching options for SJU-SEA and found US for $373 round trip. The morning I wanted to book, t
28 Goblin211: I 100% agree. For once I think this is a fee everyone would like! "Reservation for two on the 8 a.m. Seattle flight--Goblin211" "Sure, right this way