Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Please Look At This  
User currently offlineL-1011-500 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 368 posts, RR: 1
Posted (14 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1355 times:

Looking at the Paris Air Show, and basically looking back in commercial aviation over the past few years, it seems that the 737 is selling well, but even faithul Boeing customers such as BA and LH can't resist the A320/319/321...why is this? How do the A320 and the 737 compare?



This topic can be discussed w/o it turning into an A vs. b war...so keep it that way, cause I am really serious about this topic


3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAirways45 From United Kingdom, joined May 2000, 302 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1261 times:

BA's decision was largely due to Airbus offering them such good prices that they couldn't refuse. Also, Rolls gave them a power by the hour deal on the IAE V2500 engines, so it made financial sense. BA, for instance, has not recently made politically motivated decisions (they initially bought the GE90 and not the Trent for the 777...

Lufthansa has the A320 family because of the cost savings that Airbus offer compared to Boeing. Pilots of A319/20/21/30/40 can fly any of the aircraft with minimal training, whereas only Boeing has the 757/767 cross crew qualification. Airbus keeps training costs down. However, UAL & US Airways are building up strong Airbus fleets to replace 737s whereas CO & AA are taking 737NG. When it comes down to it, the A320 & 737 does the same job, and so competition between the manufacturers may help airlines decide which to operate. Note how NW is taking A330s since their A320 pilots will be also able to fly A330s. I guess that pilots like the varied work of flying long & short haul flights.

User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1221 times:

I agree, it really boils down to economics. Airbus on several occasions offer a better deal than Boeing when it comes to pricing. Commonality is the big factor as well. On the Boeing side of that coin, note how many 744 operators also have the 777.


User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (14 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1193 times:

Some Europen airlines with all short-medium haul Airbus fleet (or that planning for it, I mean AF,IB,AZ,OS) were moved in their decision more from political reason. They were owed by state and if they ordered Airbus they had got some work for their domestic (also state owned) factory.

Different is the situation in US.

But anyway both the planes are good.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Longest Airbridge? Look At This One... posted Thu Jun 29 2006 22:56:44 by DIA
Hey Look At This-Graphical Air Traffic posted Sun Aug 28 2005 00:40:25 by KarlB737
Take A Look At This A320... posted Tue Dec 14 2004 15:19:20 by AC330
Look At This Pic-Why Are There No Overheadbins? posted Thu Sep 9 2004 22:12:45 by COEWR2587
Best Biz Seats On A 321: Have A Look At This! posted Sun Jun 8 2003 08:59:11 by Salim
Take A Look At This KLM 744 posted Tue Mar 11 2003 17:44:48 by Red Panda
Wilmington (state) Look At This... posted Sun Nov 3 2002 23:10:21 by Big777jet
Look At This Airline Name! posted Sat Oct 26 2002 01:28:10 by Big777jet
Look At This Angle Drifting Take Off Strong Wind posted Sat Oct 19 2002 17:27:15 by Big777jet
Whoa Look At This Time Turn Around Fast! posted Tue Oct 15 2002 03:02:04 by Big777jet