Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Should The U.S. Be Re-regulated?  
User currently offlineKonaB777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1067 times:

This is a touchy issue, but do you think that the United States air system should be re-regulated?

I think it should be, because ever since de-regulation, airline service has plummeted and fares have skyrocketed. Air travel in the U.S. is more like an endurance marathon than a way to get from A to B.

Well, tell me your opinion.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1031 times:

No, it should NOT. We don't need to government controlling everything. Also, if you adjust for inflation, ticket prices are less than they were before deregulation.


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1025 times:

Bring back the hated CAB?
Have govt dictate which airline should fly where? Have govt fix rates based on predetermined averages? No way. Let the market take care of itself like it should.
Govt. regulation is necessary for safety measures, thats all.

We pay less today for airfares than ever before. Yes, we dont get meals on flights, but who cares for a pile of mystery meat. Air travel is an endurance marathon not because of deregulation but because of airport constraints and the subsequent gridlocks they cause.


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4499 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1017 times:

No, no, and no! Deregulation has brought far more benefit than cost to American consumers, businesses, and communities. The numbers tell the story: fewer than 300 million Americans flew in 1978, and over 660 million flew last year. That's growth far beyond what economic and/ or population growth could possibly account for.

Ticket prices are actually far lower *on average* than below deregulation, adjusted for inflation. THis brings us to the one real inequity of deregulation, which the market has still not adequately corrected on its own. Most of this benefit is in major markets.....medium and small size communities unfortunately don't see lower ticket prices unless Southwest comes in to hold the Six Families mafia cartel acccountable.

The bifurcated airline industry that has resulted from deregulation has distributed its benefits unevenly. The high-cost, high fare Six Families and similar carriers reach down to the smallest of air markets (with help of regional affiliates) but gouge for the service. The low-fare carriers pick and choose a few medium-size markets and make everyone else drive, an inequitable outcome which for now is unavoidable. No one seems to have come up with a profit formula for economically and consistently bringing low-fare service to small communities, and the medium-size communities not served by Southwest.

The Six Families enforce this inequitable situation by predatory practices, which shut down the free market. So the only "regulation" that is needed is stiffer predatory pricing and capacity-dumping amendments to the Sherman Antitrust Act. The outcome of the USA vs. AMR suit shows that tougher capacity dumping standards especially are needed. The government must vigorously protect the level free market playing field.

But beyond that...the government should not re-regulate the industry. That only protected high fares and high cost structures. Deregulation has been a winner, and its weaknesses can be corrected over time if ingenuity and the free market are kept open and allowed to do their work.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineKUGN From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 615 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1005 times:

Absolutely NOT.

Goverment should stay away from micromanaging our lives. They should take care of ensuring air travel safety, and that conditions for competition exist.


User currently offlineLsjef From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 998 times:

As Bill might have said (under the right circumstances) "it depends on how you define deregulation".

IMHO, deregulation is a misnomer, a distortion foisted upon the population to believe somehow this system of commercial aviation is no longer government regulated and instead reacts to pure market forces. It simply ain't so.

DCA-ROCguy makes some very good points, and I totally agree with the idea of more substantial antitrust enforcement by the government. That, in the big picture, is the only meaningful input the government can provide to protect citizens...both for fare-payers and new commercial interests.

CAB served its purpose at a time when governments around the world were helping to build an industry of the future (and the huge economic developments associated therewith). But, in its last decade, CAB followed the path of nearly all over-matured regulators, becoming a protectionist tool for those they were intended to regulate. In this sense, the legal changes of 1978 were a good idea, and long overdue. The result has been a new dynamic that has opened the doors (despite barriers such as the Wright Amendment) for SWA, JetBlue, et al.

Before we fairly consider reregulation, we need to achieve true deregulation. We are nowhere near there yet.


User currently offlineNW-ELITE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 990 times:

NO!! This would hurt the industry!

User currently offlineR.I.P TWA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 972 times:

Fares have dropped, that's what added competition produces. And I think the REST of the world needs to de-regulate. Imagine all the new routes and low fares. Sounds good to me.

User currently offline767-322ETOPS From United States of America, joined May 2001, 324 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 963 times:

If you think that airline management can screw things up, it's nothing compared to what the government can do.




User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7773 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 951 times:

I have to really agree with Jim here on this one, his observations seem to be right on the ball.

From my observations in the last decade of the CAB regulation become more and more a system of political cronyism and favoritism, airlines in favor with the CAB or powerful senators or the administration got what they wanted.

Right now we have enough tools, like the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, to help encourage competition and prevent monopoly and oligolpoly. We just need some political will to make it happen. Which seems to be needed for pretty much everything in Washington these days.

I think the original point Kona was getting at is airport overcrowding, though I could be wrong. But as things are snowballing close to gridlock the market will revolt and costs for airlines will become too expensive to continue the trend of pushing the airport infrastructure over-capacity. Until local and federal governments, the airlines, the unions, airport neighbors and all associated parties come to some mutual understanding that they need to come to some sort of solution not much will happen.



Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineKwbl From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 444 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 932 times:

re-regulation would be a big mistake!! I actually have a united schedule from 1975 and airfares are not much different on many routes. if you adjust for inflation, they would actually be less in many instances. Overall, deregulation has been more good than bad and putting the govt in charge would be problematic

User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39831 posts, RR: 74
Reply 11, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 929 times:

I say get rid of all noise abatement policies.


Bring back the Concorde
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Should The Airlines Be Re-regulated? posted Sun Nov 17 2002 17:40:41 by A/c dxer
Should US Airlines Be Re-regulated? posted Sun Sep 12 2004 16:22:27 by F4N
Will The Airlines Be Re-regulated? posted Tue Sep 18 2001 00:16:12 by JetBlue-320
Should The Mentally Ill Be Allowed To Fly? posted Fri Dec 9 2005 00:51:18 by Hmmmm...
When Will The Old ISP Terminal Be Re-done? posted Wed Oct 13 2004 03:14:17 by IslipWN
Boeing Could Be Re-designing The 7E7 posted Sat Jul 10 2004 14:54:34 by 777ER
Where Should The Next US Spottermeeting Be? posted Sat Apr 5 2003 15:25:05 by UN_B732
Could/Should Gulfstream Be In The RJ Game? posted Sun Jan 12 2003 15:22:18 by FlagshipAZ
Should Boeing Be "Playing The Game"? posted Thu Jul 25 2002 04:01:09 by Reggaebird
The LAX Question? Should It Be Expanded? posted Tue Jan 15 2002 06:10:34 by VH-BZF