Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Top Gear: Spectacular Aircraft Footage  
User currently offlinemanfredj From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1132 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 23442 times:

Well, my favorite show of all time has out done themselves. Their recent Christmas special features incredible flying by the Ilyushin Il-76 carrying James, Jeremy and Richard Hammond and three convertibles. Enjoy the video while the cargo doors open mid flight...the camera catches the rest of the action. The action begins at 3:26....enjoy this rare glimpse inside the IIyushin, what a beauty!
http://www.streetfire.net/video/top-...three-wise-men-special_2182663.htm

Moderators, please keep this is the civil forum as the airplane is carrying civilian passengers!


757: The last of the best
28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineukoverlander From United Kingdom, joined May 2010, 363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 23407 times:

Have you seen the US 'remake of Top Gear on the History Channel?.........a sorry imitation of the real thing!

Sorry, off topic I know.


User currently offlinemanfredj From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 23176 times:

I've boycotted it! It's terrible!


757: The last of the best
User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8193 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 23111 times:

Quoting ukoverlander (Reply 1):
Have you seen the US 'remake of Top Gear on the History Channel?.........a sorry imitation of the real thing!

I've never been more embarrassed watching a TV show. I got a call telling me "top gear is on the history channel!" I had no idea there even was an American version- I cannot explain how terrible, cringey, pitiful, and un-funny it was. On behalf of all Americans, I'd like to apologize to Britain for making such a mockery of your show, and I sincerely hope it goes away soon.



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineglbltrvlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 699 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 22813 times:

Quoting N766UA (Reply 3):
I've never been more embarrassed watching a TV show. I got a call telling me "top gear is on the history channel!" I had no idea there even was an American version- I cannot explain how terrible, cringey, pitiful, and un-funny it was. On behalf of all Americans, I'd like to apologize to Britain for making such a mockery of your show, and I sincerely hope it goes away soon

I feel that way about every US remake of a British show I like. Most of the time the remake sinks quickly without a trace (Life on Mars). Every once it a while one manages to survive more than a season (Three's Company, The Office, etc.). The only thing I can attribute that to is random chance.


User currently offlineBMIFlyer From UK - England, joined Feb 2004, 8810 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 22780 times:

Quoting manfredj (Thread starter):
The action begins at 3:26....enjoy this rare glimpse inside the IIyushin, what a beauty!

Yeah, that's what I like 



Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own
User currently offlineDiamondFlyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1509 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 22677 times:

I did happen to see the Top Gear Christmas special, and it had some good footage in it. But on the topic of Top Gear US, it seems to be getting much better in the last few weeks, rather than the first 3 episodes. They've done some amusing challenges and what not, and have had some decent cars on and whatnot. People who wanted the same show aren't the market for Top Gear US, so perhaps maybe you shouldn't try to ruin it for those who do enjoy the show as it is.

-DiamondFlyer


User currently offlineglbltrvlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 699 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 22641 times:

Quoting DiamondFlyer (Reply 6):
People who wanted the same show aren't the market for Top Gear US

That's definitely true and a great deal of the attachment to the show (whichever version) is really down to the hosts you get familiar with first. I've been watching the UK version for years now and clearly the chemistry between Jeremy, James and Richard is what makes the show for me and my family. Saying people watch the show for objective reviews of the cars is a bit like saying people watch The Bachelor for dating advice!

That said, I have watched a few of the Australian Top Gears and had a somewhat similar reaction. Not quite as bad as the US first show, but nothing I would go out of my way to watch. Didn't much care for the presenters but was familiar with the route around Melbourne they were using for one of the races so I enjoyed seeing places I had been.


User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30586 posts, RR: 84
Reply 8, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 22608 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The current Top Gear UK hosts have 15 series together under their belt. Over those years they've gelled together and is it really fair to compare a show that has had the time to mature (*snicker*) and polish itself with one that is just getting started? Watch the first series of Top Gear UK and tell me it's as epic as, say, Series 7 or Series 10.

IMO, Top Gear USA launched stronger than Top Gear Australia and Top Gear Russia did. I've not really seen any chemistry with the TGR crew and while TGA's second season was stronger than it's first, NINE has not done the show any favors with a third presenter change in as many seasons.

TGUSA's team are building chemistry. Yes, they are recycling skits we've already seen on Top Gear UK, but the TGUK team is, to my knowledge, helping to write TGUSA's scripts.


User currently offlineUAL777UK From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 3356 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 22015 times:

The Christmas Special was great. Those guys have arguably the best job on the world. They are very good friends, hence they gel really well and it shows in front of the camera.

User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15719 posts, RR: 26
Reply 10, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 21592 times:

Quoting ukoverlander (Reply 1):
Have you seen the US 'remake of Top Gear on the History Channel?.........a sorry imitation of the real thing!

They lost a lot of the humor and none of the hosts is outspoken enough. It's just three guys making canned but still mediocre one liners.

Quoting DiamondFlyer (Reply 6):
But on the topic of Top Gear US, it seems to be getting much better in the last few weeks, rather than the first 3 episodes. They've done some amusing challenges and what not, and have had some decent cars on and whatnot.

I've missed the last few episodes, but I think the show's hosts seem to lack polish and audacity. Tanner has the car knowledge and skills (perhaps too much so, as challenges are one pro wiping the floor with two amateurs), Rutledge is a big dumb hillbilly, and Adam just cracks one liners as if he just walked off the set of CSI Miami. No mocking ecotards, no proper Stig intro, etc. That said, there is no reason that the show shouldn't work in America. Also, I would add that it is on the wrong channel. The show would probably do much better on Discovery Channel where it would fit in well and probably find a common audience with their science-entertainment shows like Mythbusters and Dirty Jobs. Even MTV might have made an interesting home for Top Gear America.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 8):
Yes, they are recycling skits we've already seen on Top Gear UK, but the TGUK team is, to my knowledge, helping to write TGUSA's scripts.

Most of the first season of The Office was more or less a straight conversion of the British version. The American adaptation took a diverging, and in my opinion better, trajectory from the second season on.

Quoting UAL777UK (Reply 9):
Those guys have arguably the best job on the world.

I wouldn't argue that.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineManchesterMAN From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 1219 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 21344 times:

For the record that was a RUS Aviation aircraft and the filming took place in Erbil. The crew didn't fly in from Georgia as suggested in the show though, they just boarded in EBL did a few circuits around the airport and landed again. I guess the presenters flew into EBL on one of the scheduled carriers flying thee like OS?


Flown: A300,A319,A320,A321,A330,A340.A380,717,727,737,747,757,767,777,DC9,DC10,MD11,MD80,F100,F50,ERJ,E190,CRJ,BAe146,Da
User currently offlineBeakerLTN From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2009, 291 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 20962 times:

...on the subject of being outspoken, is that ever *really* going to be possible when the programme is funded by sponsors? I mean they can hardly rubbish a car when it's being sponsored by it, or relying on advertising revenue. I guess this must something that many 'consumer' programmes must suffer from in the US.


300/319/320/321/330/732/733/734/73G/738/744/772/77W/146/EMB135/EMB145
User currently offlinemanfredj From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 18809 times:

I'll play fair. I was brought up on the original, so naturally it will always be my preference. We get to know the characters as if they are our friends. Watching the US version almost feels as if I'm cheating on my mates. I guess I could say the same for those who begin with the American Top Gear.

James is irreplaceable. His laid back attitduude and somewhat old school approach contrasts beautifully with Jeremy's hammer on ice approach. Richard is the most American of the group with his love for muscle cars and almost red neck lifestyle.


In terms of bias car reviews, I can't help but to admire Jeremy's brutal honesty in his reviews. Car and Driver, Road and Track and Automobile magazine are hopeless periodicals in the US. When I stumbled upon TopGear magazine, I was sold on its humor, wit and to-the-point reporting on cars. These guys have a complete disregard for who makes or provides the cars they test. They just want them to possess a fun factor. If it's absent, then they tell the manufacaterer to go back to the drawing board. This is how reporting should be done.

In regards to the latest holiday episode, I was simply amazed at the aircraft stunt. I think this is the only time we'll be able to see what an acutal go around looks like from the back of an airplane. Can you even open the cargo doors on a C130 on take off or landing? Would it even be allowed? Is the Ilyushin Il-76 a powerful aircraft by todays standards?



757: The last of the best
User currently offlineglbltrvlr From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 699 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 17037 times:

Quoting manfredj (Reply 13):
Can you even open the cargo doors on a C130 on take off or landing? Would it even be allowed?

I've been on a C-130 when we've done a LAPES drop (Low Altitude Parachute Extract System). You basically fly about 5 feet above the drop zone and let a parachute pull the cargo out the back. I've heard of landings with the back open when going into a fire zone and the troops have 30 seconds or less to evacuate but never been on one.


User currently offlinebuck3y3nut From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 879 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 16296 times:

Give the three guys on the American version some time. Once they build chemistry, they will come good. They are just beginning to work with one another. I'm sure the first season, JC, RH & JM weren't the best of buddies. Most of the comic relief we get is due to the wonderful chemistry b/w the three. The challenges so far on the American version have been decent. Obviously not the original Top Gear UK; but still its not bad for a start... Give them time, and they will come good...

User currently offlineCobraManeuver From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2011, 13 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 15659 times:

stentorian roar of D-30's

beautiful bird


User currently offlineCEO@AFG From Norway, joined Jan 2001, 245 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 15603 times:

I gave up on TopGear Australia from the start, the US version has gotten better and better by each episode. Give it some time and it'll improve. The race to Key West is the highpoint of the series for me, so far.


"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue." Steven McCroskey, Airplane!
User currently offlineDiamondFlyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1509 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 15284 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 10):
Rutledge is a big dumb hillbilly

Wow really? You must be from a blue state. Rutledge is so much like middle-America, where the real target market for the show/channel is. Honestly, he's the best thing that the show has going in regards to hosts. Of the three, he seems like the most fun to hang out with.

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 10):
No mocking ecotards

You must have missed the last episode, where they had nothing good to say about the CRZ.

Quoting BeakerLTN (Reply 12):
...on the subject of being outspoken, is that ever *really* going to be possible when the programme is funded by sponsors? I mean they can hardly rubbish a car when it's being sponsored by it, or relying on advertising revenue.

Totally not true. They have very few good things to say about the Honda CRZ in the last episode.

But, to keep this aviation related in someway, what did everyone thing about the Lotus vs Seaplane vs Boat race. Granted, it was very similar to what they did in Europe, but still was an enjoyable segment.

-DiamondFlyer


User currently offlineflanker From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 1629 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 13071 times:

Quoting buck3y3nut (Reply 15):
Give the three guys on the American version some time. Once they build chemistry, they will come good. They are just beginning to work with one another.

Sorry but its not about just chemistry. ORIGINALITY comes to mind as well. These guys and their producers couldn't do it to save their lives. They went to test 3 older cars and did the same exact shit as top gear uk. pathetic,



Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist
User currently offlineukoverlander From United Kingdom, joined May 2010, 363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 11824 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 8):
Yes, they are recycling skits we've already seen on Top Gear UK, but the TGUK team is, to my knowledge, helping to write TGUSA's scripts.

And therein lies part of the problem. if you are going to re-run skits from Top Gear UK people are of course going to make comparisons. If they want this show to be 'stand alone' then they need to get a little more creative and come up with a few more original ideas.

From what I've seen the chemistry between the presenters just isn't there - they don't seem to have the verbal jousting skills, the sense of irony, and even sarcasm that has made TGUK such a success and frankly they seem a little awkward. Without that I'm afraid it's like making a pizza without the cheese.


User currently offlineAcheron From Spain, joined Sep 2005, 1598 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 11575 times:

Quoting manfredj (Reply 13):
Is the Ilyushin Il-76 a powerful aircraft by todays standards?

The Il-76 has a certain reputation for underpowered take-off. Which is odd considering the Il-76 engines, the Soloviev D-30, are pretty much the same than those in the MiG-31.


User currently offlineDrewski2112 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 119 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 11509 times:

I clicked on this thread to read a discussion about the video, not the different versions of the show. This seems more like a Non-Aviation thread than an aviation one, no thanks to the posters here.

As far as the video goes, is that a normal approach into an Iraqi airport? I know the Baghdad landings are a circle and dive bomb routine, but is the go around part of the routine too? Or was it just a pass for the cameras?


User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30586 posts, RR: 84
Reply 23, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 11306 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ukoverlander (Reply 20):
And therein lies part of the problem. if you are going to re-run skits from Top Gear UK people are of course going to make comparisons. If they want this show to be 'stand alone' then they need to get a little more creative and come up with a few more original ideas.

I would not be surprised if both the BBC and The History Channel wished to leverage some of what they felt worked with TGUK to launch the new show, giving it a bit of a "local" spin. They followed much the same program with the launch of Top Gear Australia and Top Gear Russia.



Quoting ukoverlander (Reply 20):
From what I've seen the chemistry between the presenters just isn't there - they don't seem to have the verbal jousting skills, the sense of irony, and even sarcasm that has made TGUK such a success and frankly they seem a little awkward.

Again, JC, JM and RH have been together for 15 series. Watch Series 2, Episode 6 and see how much "chemistry" they had six episodes in.  


User currently offlineSASDC8 From Norway, joined Mar 2006, 743 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (3 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9634 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Wow!! Great flying in the mighty IL-76!!

Just love Top Gear! Great humor, great cars and great excursions 



2-3-2 is NOT a premium configuration
25 Goblin211 : Absolutely my fav show of all time too!!! Bottom line is that BBC version is set in england where they have access to every European car they want and
26 macsog6 : The US version is too dull to be watched. Landing in Baghdad does not require you first make a low pass or at least it did not about four months ago.
27 sovietjet : The engines are quite different actually, despite the D-30 designation. The Tu-134 is also powered by D-30s but only have something like a 15% common
28 Post contains links Kngkyle : I watched it and thought it was pretty cool. I love it when they do challenges with airplanes. I recently watched the one where they ran some cars beh
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Top Gear To Finally Race Runway Support Vehicles! posted Sun Dec 6 2009 11:14:49 by Globetraveller
BBC TWO: Top Gear Airport Vehicle Racing! posted Sun Jul 19 2009 10:46:11 by Sebjacques92
Top Gear (Car Show) Race Track Aerodrome posted Sun Jul 31 2005 22:27:24 by BBJII
BBC Top Gear Airfield posted Mon Jun 13 2005 17:43:50 by AirbusA346
UK's 'Top Gear' Tests Effect Of Jet Blast posted Wed Jul 7 2004 16:00:34 by Backfire
Top 5 Operators Of The Following Aircraft posted Wed Jul 5 2006 16:44:32 by 1337Delta764
AC Is Top Three Aircraft MRO Providers Worldwide.. posted Mon Mar 6 2006 00:23:10 by AirCanada014
CX To Top 100 Aircraft posted Mon Aug 9 2004 22:52:03 by Babaero
Top 5 Best Aircraft posted Thu Dec 11 2003 03:37:14 by WGW2707
Top 5 Commercial Aircraft posted Fri Aug 1 2003 16:50:13 by Gmasterd