Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Volaris Applies For Ton Of Added Mexico-US Routes  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24717 posts, RR: 46
Posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 12702 times:

Consecionaria Vuela Compania de Aviacion, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (dba Volaris) today applied with the DOT for permission to engage in scheduled air service on a host of city pairs between Mexico and the US.

Requested city pairs are:

Chicago – Cancun
Chicago – Puerto Vallarta
Chicago - Zacatecas

Dallas – Mexico City

Fresno - Guadalajara

Los Angeles – Aguascalientes
Los Angeles - Cancun
Los Angeles – Mazatlan
Los Angeles – Oaxaca
Los Angeles – Puerto Vallarta
Los Angeles – San Jose del Cabo
Los Angeles - Zihuatanejo

Miami - Cancun

New York - Cancun

Oakland – Leon
Oakland – Mexico City

Sacramento - Guadalajara
Sacramento – Leon
Sacramento – Morelia
Sacramento – San Jose del Cabo

San Francisco - Guadalajara
San Francisco – Puerto Vallarta

San Jose – Leon

Carrier proposed to commence GDL-FAT, AGU-LAX, GDL-SFO, GDL-SMF, MEX-OAK along with ZCL-CHI in the short term, with remainder of routes "as warranted by commercial conditions". (new authority start up period would be valid for atleast 1-year).

OST-2011-TBA

[Edited 2011-02-03 09:43:37]


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
98 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently onlineatrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5692 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 12654 times:

I understand Volaris's priority is themselves and to ensure they get the best out of their OD feed as well.

So two questions remain, with WN inter connect going on, is there a reason they did not choose FLL over MIA?

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Miami - Cancun

As for NYC, which NYC airport is this, again would they try to hit a WN airport, EWR or LGA to allow inter connect?

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
New York - Cancun
Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Dallas – Mexico City

I'll assume this to be at DFW?


Everything else looks great, good OD feed possibly, and access to WN cities.

I am kind of surprised they didn't go for STL, with WN's huge feed in STL alone, and STL has decent feed to Mexico, or does the presence of USA3000 hinder it? F9's is only to CUN and that's during the winter.

Alex



Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
User currently offlineLV From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 1978 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 12653 times:

Very ambitious. I wish them luck but I just don't see the market out of SMF that the planners are seeing. SMF-GDL is one thing.... but the other destinations I'm not so sure about.

User currently offlinetimberwolf24 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 575 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12474 times:

Any word yet on them resuming MDW-GDL? Glad to see when they do return they are looking to add flight to MDW.


Living in LA, ORD/MDW will always be home!
User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19186 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12455 times:

Quoting LV (Reply 2):
I wish them luck but I just don't see the market out of SMF that the planners are seeing.

I know nothing about demand from SMF to Mexico, but have you done the forecasting that their route planners no doubt have?



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17281 posts, RR: 46
Reply 5, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12456 times:

Somebody must have poached AM's route planner  . Either that or they're staking their claim to as many markets as possible with the resurgence of MX and 6A on the horizon, never mind new transborder service from 4O and VB. 5 carriers, 2-3 carriers per route per the bilateral, makes sense to get in front of the onslaught.

Quoting atrude777 (Reply 1):
So two questions remain, with WN inter connect going on, is there a reason they did not choose FLL over MIA?

The way this "code share" is going the relationship looks to be next to worthless for either carrier, so I assume Y4 is going after the people and the yield, both of which are better at MIA.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlinewedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5888 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12364 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Volaris once served Mexico City through Toluca. Are they abandoning Toluca and fly into MEX instead?

User currently offlineAtlwest1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1046 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12319 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 5):
The way this "code share" is going the relationship looks to be next to worthless for either carrier, so I assume Y4 is going after the people and the yield, both of which are better at MIA.

Its not a codeshare its an interline agreement, hence the lackluster look of the relationship. When WN upgrades its systems then it will more then likely transform.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co. or Airt
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4975 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12309 times:

Quoting atrude777 (Reply 1):


I am kind of surprised they didn't go for STL, with WN's huge feed in STL alone, and STL has decent feed to Mexico, or does the presence of USA3000 hinder it? F9's is only to CUN and that's during the winter.

We do have a growing Mexican population here in STL (I know, one cannot live by VFR alone) but I think STL would certainly be on Voalris's radar if not now, then in round 2.



Next Up: STL-LGA-RIC-ATL-STL
User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7480 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12295 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Sacramento – Leon
Sacramento – Morelia

Is there really demand for these?



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineMexicana757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3028 posts, RR: 29
Reply 10, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12290 times:

Those are a ton of route authorities they are applying for, but very smart on their part to get these route authorities in now. Most of the destinations they have applied for are routes that were operated by Mexicana.

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Chicago – Cancun
Chicago – Puerto Vallarta
Chicago - Zacatecas

All former MX destinations out of Chicago. Good to see Volaris picking them up especially the Chicago-Zacatecas, that was a great route for Mexicana. I wonder when Chicago-Morelia, Monterrey and Leon are going to come along...

Quoting timberwolf24 (Reply 3):
Any word yet on them resuming MDW-GDL? Glad to see when they do return they are looking to add flight to MDW

No news on when the MDW-GDL flights will resume. I assume they will come back online by March or April. For some reasons the the flight still appears on the arrivals/departures board on the MDW website(if you can call it that) with the new flight number 940/941

Quoting atrude777 (Reply 1):
I am kind of surprised they didn't go for STL, with WN's huge feed in STL alone, and STL has decent feed to Mexico, or does the presence of USA3000 hinder it? F9's is only to CUN and that's during the winter.

From all of those route authorities it seems Volaris is trying to fill the void left by Mexicana. Most of those route authorities are for routes that MX used to fly on. I think they're preparing themselves in case MX returns and is here to stay. For now I believe STL is going to be left out.


User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17281 posts, RR: 46
Reply 11, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12245 times:

Quoting Atlwest1 (Reply 7):
Its not a codeshare its an interline agreement, hence the lackluster look of the relationship.

What ever it is, I highly doubt Y4 is choosing routes at this point based on WN flow passengers.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineMexicana757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3028 posts, RR: 29
Reply 12, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 12190 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 11):
What ever it is, I highly doubt Y4 is choosing routes at this point based on WN flow passengers.

     
Agree, I think they are choosing routes for themselves and applying for routes once operated by Mexicana. Good move on their part before Interjet and Viva get in the action.


User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5334 posts, RR: 15
Reply 13, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11937 times:

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 5):
Somebody must have poached AM's route planner.

LOL, Maverick! This all does sound sort of familiar doesn't it? The "throw everything you can at the wall and see if anything sticks" approach to route expansion! [sigh]

bb


User currently offlineWhatUsaid From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 657 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11752 times:

At FAT, Volaris signage is already up at the counter... I'd say that the airport is doing all they can to help spread the word that FAT-GDL is back (soon).

User currently offlineFly2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11730 times:

I see a lot of former MX routes. I know MX did relatively decently out of SMF.

User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24717 posts, RR: 46
Reply 16, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11704 times:

Quoting atrude777 (Reply 1):
As for NYC, which NYC airport is this, again would they try to hit a WN airport, EWR or LGA to allow inter connect?

Request does not state, however I suspect it would be JFK, where both AM and MX have been.

Volaris primary concern is not to tie into SWA, but go after markets where is can likely succeed on its own.

Quoting LV (Reply 2):
but I just don't see the market out of SMF that the planners are seeing. SMF-GDL is one thing.... but the other destinations I'm not so sure about.
Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 9):
Is there really demand for these?

Remember guys, flights don't need to be daily. Low 1-3x weekly might do very well with both the ethnic and or American leisure crowd in case of SJD.

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 6):
Volaris once served Mexico City through Toluca. Are they abandoning Toluca and fly into MEX instead?

Volaris received slots at MEX last winter an commenced domestic service to Tijuana and Mexicali. Additionally it applied for additional slots during the fall following the Mexicana shutdown.

From all they have said, they will grow MEX ops side by side with the TLC operation.

Quoting Mexicana757 (Reply 10):
From all of those route authorities it seems Volaris is trying to fill the void left by Mexicana. Most of those route authorities are for routes that MX used to fly on

   routes are ripe for the picking so why not.

Quoting SANFan (Reply 13):
This all does sound sort of familiar doesn't it? The "throw everything you can at the wall and see if anything sticks" approach to route expansion! [sigh]

And somehow I think Volaris will do better than AM.

Its lower cost base and more aggressive marketing should help in many of these markets. Just here in LA I have heard so many positive things about Volaris by those that have flown them.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently onlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 6095 posts, RR: 31
Reply 17, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 11704 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Mexicana757 (Reply 10):
I think they're preparing themselves in case MX returns and is here to stay. For now I believe STL is going to be left out.

On the contrary. I believe this means they have pretty certain internal info. that MX is not coming back.



MGGS
User currently offlinenjdevilsin03 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 727 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 11605 times:

Because fll has two airlines already serving cun maybe?


717, 727, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 73G, 738, 752, 753, 762, 763, 777, DC9, MD80, DC10, L1011, ERJ, CRJ, ATR, DH8, A300,
User currently offlineSOBHI51 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jun 2003, 3412 posts, RR: 17
Reply 19, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 11572 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Any plans for them to fly to IAD?


I am against any terrorist acts committed under the name of Islam
User currently offlineAtlwest1 From United States of America, joined Jan 2009, 1046 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 11502 times:

They should link up Atlanta to some of there Mexican markets? or is it because FL is there and could come back at them, not the least of DL/AM?


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co. or Airt
User currently offlinewedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5888 posts, RR: 6
Reply 21, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 11342 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
Sacramento – Leon
Sacramento – Morelia
Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 9):
Is there really demand for these?

You'd be surprised. TAESA and Azteca tried the OAK-Leon and OAK-Morelia with some decent success. Mexico isn't all tourists.

SMF-Leon and SMF-Morelia will be good for native Mexicans.

I'm hoping Y4 will re-expand service out of OAK...maybe reinstate 2X daily OAK-GDL, OAK-MEX (as mentioned) and maybe OAK-Leon and OAK-Morelia/Zacatecas.


User currently offlineFATFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 5789 posts, RR: 15
Reply 22, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 11054 times:

I haven't read the filing yet but 2 different media reports say FAT-GDL will be the first of these routes started.

"Volaris says in the filing that one of the planned routes, Guadalajara-Fresno, "will begin immediately after receipt of the department's approval". "
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...or-more-than-20-new-us-routes.html

The same idea is also mentioned locally
""Volaris plans to commence scheduled service on the Guadalajara-Fresno route immediately after approval of this application," the airline reported."
http://www.fresnobee.com/2011/02/03/...s-airline-plans-fresno-mexico.html

Glad to see its on a fast track.



"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." - Mark Twain
User currently offlinecloud4000 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 641 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10598 times:

What's with applying DOT for permission to the United States? Shouldn't US and Mexico have an open skies policy like US and Canada?


Boston, USA
User currently offlineMexicana757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3028 posts, RR: 29
Reply 24, posted (3 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 10367 times:

Quoting cloud4000 (Reply 23):
What's with applying DOT for permission to the United States? Shouldn't US and Mexico have an open skies policy like US and Canada?

Mexico and the United States don't have an open skies agreement.


25 cloud4000 : Well they should. I don't know why this hasn't happened yet, with NAFTA and everything: we have free movement of goods, why not apply this to air tra
26 FATFlyer : About 3 years ago it was Mexico that was resisting an open skies agreement. Their Transport Minister expressed concerns that US airlines would domina
27 keagkid101 : I'd hope they'd fly out of BWI instead of IAD.
28 cloud4000 : checking their route map, Volaris flies MDW-GDL. Does MDW have immigration/custom facilities, or does GDL has pre-clearance facilities?
29 FlyingSicilian : CO almost does already. IAH has the most Mexican destinations of any US airport. Just because Volaris applies for these, does not mean they have to f
30 LAXintl : Once awarded, they authorities are good for one-year.
31 Atlwest1 : MDW does have full customs at Gate A1 and A2 i believe. MDW has customs staff due to the bizjets that come into MDW from all over. Its actually a nic
32 ghost77 : With the 8 Airbus 319/320s secured for this year, they needed to open routes. It's a shame they're not seeing down the map. TA as a stake owner in Y4
33 EWRandMDW : Let's not forget Porter Airlines between MDW and YTZ -- they ulilize MDW's customs facilities as well.
34 WROORD : It is rather small, but at the same time no lines and officers seem to be nicer - I'd say almost happy to see you.
35 civilav : Sadly, I could not agree more with you !! The Mexicana saga is becoming a bit of a sick joke and, like you state, probably Volaris is smelling blood
36 DesertAir : I agree that Volaris is trying to insure that Mexicana does not make a come-back. I am jazzed to see that they re applying for SMF routes. I fly them
37 WhatUsaid : Sounds good. Isn't the seat pitch pretty tight? I fly FAT-GDL a couple times a year and really enjoyed MX.
38 Post contains images Mexicana757 : Switch A1 to A3. Gates A2 and A3 are the customs gates. Now that you mention A1, I wonder if that gate can be turned into an customs gate if needed.
39 laca773 : This is very smart of Y4's part and hats off to them! I hope they get these routes they have applied for and they succeed in these markets. All of th
40 Tomassjc : We could definately use some MLM service from the Bay Area. There's a huge population of Michoacanos here. Tomas SJC
41 ghost77 : MX had 124 seats in the A319 vs 144 from Y4. The best option is Interjet by FAR. They have 150 seats in the A320. It's a beautiful pitch!!! You hit t
42 AR385 : I disagree. Recently, AM annonunced they are now abl to order 25 aircraft. They added the equivalent of 7 aircraft through better hour utilization an
43 NASCARAirforce : I am surprised MCO isn't on the list at least for the summer. We get a ton of Mexican charter flights in the summer from AMX, and before they went ban
44 Post contains images LAXdude1023 : I am thrilled about this one as well. AA has the market too themselves and its too large for just one carrier. This along with DFW-MLM/MZT (which AA
45 EddieDude : DAL is not an international airport and it only has flights to neighboring states, so I would imagine there is no other choice but DFW. I, for one, e
46 MaverickM11 : It's not a very big local market--roughly the same size as SATMEX; and there are already about 4 daily flights.
47 EddieDude : So, I guess you agree that we won't see any carrier from Mexico flying regularly scheduled services to ATL (other than AM of course due to the obviou
48 LAXdude1023 : San Antonio is a histroically Mexican city. In modern times, I would not call San Antonio a Mexican city, but rather a Tejano city. The amount of Mex
49 AR385 : Don´t forget that nobody is using the highways to the border anymore. It´s been at least two years since we´ve been able to visit my father´s res
50 MaverickM11 : It'd be tough to pry that traffic away from Skyteam, and any other Mexican markets are pretty small to ATL. I think this is really overstated, since
51 LAXintl : Today the DOT approved Volaris petition with the exception of the Miami - Cancun route which the DOT found Volaris does not hold the required underlyi
52 Post contains images Mexicana757 : Now for the wait to see when the routes they want to open immediately will start. Should be interesting to see how many routes they pick up within th
53 FATFlyer : Yes the local rumor is that Volaris will make its official FAT-GDL announcement in the next week or two with service starting before spring break seas
54 N537FX : They could become a big player and maybe rise up to the status of Aeromexico
55 wedgetail737 : That would be very good for those folks in the San Joaquin Valley after MX's stoppage.
56 ghost77 : Hello, All routes have been approved except one. CUN-MIA wasn't approved because DOT says the Mexican DGAC didn't approved it. g77
57 wncrew : What's the status on MDW-GDL? It was stopped for a while pending approval of Y4's deicing procedures (as I'd read on here)... was that remedied?
58 keagkid101 : Hopefully we'll see MEX-BOS and MEX-BWI or IAD soon.
59 cloud4000 : AeroMexico couldn't make MEX-BOS work, I doubt Volaris could do the same.
60 smoot4208 : And Mexicana couldn't make MEX-BWI work either
61 Post contains images LAXintl : Maybe fly in the summer only when the chance of deicing is zero LOL Hey ghost did you read what was posted already? see....
62 ghost77 : Sorry LAX, I always read everything before posting, I didn't do it this time, thus didn't read what you replied. Coincidence? Nooooooo, MX is returnin
63 DFWMEX : Has DFW-MEX been approved? If so, is there a docket # we can see for details? We need competition here at DFW to keep prices down to MEX. I badly miss
64 LAXintl : see.... However there is no timeline for the service. All Volaris has requested and been granted is the underlying authority.
65 mfe777 : GDL-MFE or MEX-MFE would be great! A lot of people are too scared to make the drive now. There is a charter company called GID Explore that is runnin
66 Mexicana757 : It appears the situation has been fixed since one is able to book flights on the route again. Looks like flights resume February 28th. Now to wait fo
67 LAXintl : Volaris applied today for yet additional route - Las Vegas - Toluca.
68 skyone : That was what I was waiting for!!! if Y4 starts TLC-LAS and TLC-FLL, then fares will go way down in this markets..
69 WhatUsaid : I noted that FAT is now in the Volaris on-line reservations, but the schedule hasn't been loaded. Has anyone heard, are we talking red-eyes again, bas
70 DesertAir : Based on my knowledge of Volaris, they run flights all night long. Here in Tijuana they have flights departing at 2:00 AM. I would suspect that the Fr
71 wedgetail737 : I would tend to agree. The two OAK-GDL flights are redeyes. SJC-GDL is during sunlight because of curfews. Then LAX runs all day and all night long!
72 EddieDude : I frankly think they should fly from MEX and not from TLC.
73 MaverickM11 : So what are Interjet's plans? Why haven't they applied for anything?
74 wedgetail737 : Some of the service authority requests are flights to MEX, and not TLC. OAK-MEX is in the works. I think Y4 should try SEA-GDL.
75 Mexicana757 : Interjet CEO has stated that won't do any international flying until next year. Who know's what they're up to.
76 Post contains images adriaticus : Mexico will not consider open skies agreement with the USA for as long as the USA continues to fail to honor ground transportation access to Mexican
77 DesertAir : Mexico City is a huge urban area. It can take hours to arrive at the Mexico City airport which is right in the middle of this metropolis. Tolcua is o
78 EddieDude : They are busy consolidating their position as the second largest carrier in the domestic market. Plus, they are busy planning an IPO on the Mexican S
79 AR385 : Really? How strange. I thought that by then MX would be back operating over 60 aircraft at least, full service and with investors doling out cash due
80 EddieDude : Well, this is the thing: From Santa Fe, TLC is a much better choice than MEX hands down because, as you mention, it is a short ride or drive. I suppo
81 AR385 : I thought you were talking about Volaris. The rest of the post is irony. You know, The info on MX depends really on which media you read. That was al
82 laca773 : It seems many traveling to Mexico and Central America, they have a preference for redeye flights traveling southbound. These flights have always done
83 skyone : Ok Y4, you keep growing at LAX, but when are you going to give us TLC-LAS or TLC/MEX-FLL, we need it!!!!!!!!! LOL Ohhh well, guess will have to wait u
84 ghost77 : It's not possible Sky. MIA and FLL are considered one airport. So, out from MEX there's one American missing but on the mexican side no one can step.
85 Aeolus : Who are the owners? Is Slim still involved? I'm asking because I remember Slim and the guy from Televisa wanting out of Volaris for a while, but I do
86 skyone : Spirit has its hub in FLL and flies both domestic and international while WN has a strong presence at this airport, being one of its focus cities. Bo
87 Post contains links ghost77 : Nope, it won't be a night operation. They'll fly TUE and FRI eff June 3rd, 2011. Lets see if they start the route. More info here: http://www.flyapm.
88 Post contains links EddieDude : SINCA Inbursa and a Televisa vehicle have sold all of their shares in Volaris in July of 2010: http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...sa-sell-mexico-
89 BGOODAM : Volaris is betting all, that their WN codeshare works given the bad state of the Mexican economy and the lack of people traveling to mexico, not a goo
90 pzurita1 : Not sure what you mean about this. In 2010, despite the increased violence, the number of international pax flying to Mexico increased 9,1% reaching
91 OP3000 : TACA's owning family (the Kriete's) increased their shareholding by buying a good chunk of the Televisa/Inbursa shares. One of the sisters is a Mexic
92 ghost77 : Are you absolutely positively sure about this numbers and increase? Aren't you making this up? g77
93 Post contains links pzurita1 : I would not dare. Go to http://www.sectur.gob.mx/work/models...e/1227/1/images/CONCANACO_2011.pdf and try page 14 Using figures from DGAC, numbers ch
94 FATFlyer : FAT-GDL is now loaded into the Volaris website. It appears flights start April 14. Initial service is 4 days per week as expected. dep GDL 9:15pm arr
95 SANFan : And, 'Flyer, is this fairly similar to the previous MX schedule? Will the red-eye r/t work OK? Congrat's to Fresno for getting this service back rela
96 SurfandSnow : No surprise there, they did say that would be the first one to start. Now, when will the next new route (AGU-LAX) begin? They said after FAT-GDL bega
97 smoot4208 : When do all the LAX-Mexico routes begin? I know wikipedia is notorious for false info, but it has them all starting April 14. But when I go to Volaris
98 FATFlyer : It is similiar to the MX schedule I believe. But currently it appears Volaris does not have bookable connections for Fresno passengers at GDL. It may
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways Sues State Of New Mexico posted Tue Dec 11 2007 02:43:17 by ABQ747
Volaris Applies For GDL-LAS posted Fri Apr 23 2010 16:17:36 by LAXintl
Volaris Applies For GDL-SJC & Chicago posted Fri Feb 12 2010 16:32:27 by LAXintl
Volaris Applies For LAX-MTY posted Wed Nov 18 2009 17:32:38 by LAXintl
Volaris Applies For LAX-MLM & ZCL posted Fri Oct 2 2009 19:16:06 by LAXintl
State Of New Mexico Subsidizing ABQ-CUU Flights posted Thu Jun 18 2009 16:50:20 by 1337Delta764
Volaris Applies For TIJ-OAK posted Sat May 23 2009 09:25:59 by LAXintl
Volaris Applies For GDL-LAX posted Sat May 16 2009 09:30:45 by LAXintl
Volaris Applies For LAX & OAK posted Tue Mar 24 2009 15:14:32 by LAXintl
Anyone Know Of New F9 RW Routes? posted Mon Sep 17 2007 06:03:57 by ExpressJet_ERJ