Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BUR WN Overun Question  
User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 6622 posts, RR: 20
Posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5559 times:

Just became aware of this picture and was curiou; is the gas station still there? I don't see it. Its funny, in 2006 while visiting, I drove right down this road and pass this location. I didn't even realize the significance of where I was.   



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrew Hunt - AirTeamImages




I feel woozy....what did you put in that Pudding Pop?
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinerichierich From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 4296 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5548 times:

Gas station was removed after this accident. The B737 never flew again either... could have been a lot worse!


None shall pass!!!!
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3258 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5173 times:

The Captain knew he was high; knew he was fast; and that is was a fairly short runway. Why he didn't go-around is beyond me. Cost the two pilots their jobs. As the previous poster pointed out, this incident wasn't that far off being a totally different outcome.

User currently offline71Zulu From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3088 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5162 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 2):
Cost the two pilots their jobs

The F/O got his back.



The good old days: Delta L-1011s at MSY
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3258 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5128 times:

Runway Excursions is the next big issue the Boeing and the industry are trying to tackle. There are a number of potential technologies that need to be studied; everything from cues on the HUD, to a voice aural added to the EGPWS box that will alert the crew when they are too high or two fast (similar to RAAS, only for stable approaches).

Runway Incursions have gotten a lot of attention and new implementations (e.g. an Airport Moving Map display on some newer models), and will continue to be worked. However, as the "father of EGPWS" at Honeywell pointed out, far more people have died due to Runway Excursions than Runway Incursions.

It always feels good working on a given project when you know that maybe someday an airplane full of people are going to wake up alive the next day, rather than the alternative, because of something you contributed to.


User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1297 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4955 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 4):
Runway Excursions

Sadly, to me, that name makes it sound like fun. Like the airplane would enjoy taking an excursion out around the airport perimeter.  

BUR has added EMAS at the end of Runway 8. Unless the aircraft goes through EMAS at incredibly high speed, I don't think the 2006 type of accident will happen there again.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tony Williams

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineered_materials_arrestor_system
-Matt



Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineplanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3539 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4863 times:

Quoting 71Zulu (Reply 3):
The F/O got his back.

But he had to start at the back of the seniority list, which is like losing half of your job.



Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26005 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4827 times:

Quoting richierich (Reply 1):
Gas station was removed after this accident.


User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3258 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4636 times:

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 5):
Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 4):
Runway Excursions

Sadly, to me, that name makes it sound like fun. Like the airplane would enjoy taking an excursion out around the airport perimeter.

Yeah, understood. Except Runway Excursions usually ain't fun. If you're lucky you end up like WN in BUR or AA in KIN - maybe a broken airplane but no fatalities. If you aren't lucky, you end up with something really ugly like TP in FNC or JJ in CGH.

While the passengers came out okay, that little boy riding in the car passing along a road at the end of the runway at MDW during WN's other Runway Excusion wasn't too lucky either, tragically.

Like I said, both Boeing and the rest of the industry recognizes this is an area that really needs to be addressed, and are doing so.


User currently offlineWakeTurbulence From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1297 posts, RR: 16
Reply 9, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 4029 times:

Quoting BoeingGuy (Reply 4):
Runway Excursions is the next big issue the Boeing and the industry are trying to tackle. There are a number of potential technologies that need to be studied; everything from cues on the HUD, to a voice aural added to the EGPWS box that will alert the crew when they are too high or two fast (similar to RAAS, only for stable approaches).

Yes, I was being sarcastic above, but you are correct that it is a serious issue (hopefully they find a better name). I am curious about the tech that you speak of. Adding something to the GPWS sounds interesting, but would it be more cost effective to make it specific to an airport by linking it through something like an Electronic Flight Bag? The incident at BUR and MDW would not have happened practically anywhere else in the US because of the short runways at both airports. Having the GPWS tell a pilot that they are approaching too high doesn't do much when you are landing on a 10,000 foot runway and have plenty of room to stop.
-Matt

[Edited 2011-02-27 19:11:50]


Jetwash Images - Feel the Heat!!!
User currently offlineBoeingGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 3258 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (3 years 9 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1679 times:

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 9):
Adding something to the GPWS sounds interesting, but would it be more cost effective to make it specific to an airport by linking it through something like an Electronic Flight Bag?
http://www51.honeywell.com/honeywell...ils/06.15.09SmartLanding.html?c=31


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
WN Tail # Question posted Sat Mar 21 2009 07:21:30 by RBint83
WN Repaint Question(S) (Pictures Included) posted Fri Jan 4 2008 15:48:12 by SXDFC
WN Fleet Question? posted Tue Dec 25 2007 20:34:01 by Super80DFW
WN Load Question For 8-18-05 posted Tue Aug 16 2005 22:18:58 by Luv2fly
WN 6231 Question posted Tue Feb 17 2004 01:18:47 by Flairport
WN Aircraft Question posted Fri Oct 31 2003 02:40:17 by BMIA330
WN Flight Status Question posted Fri Apr 17 2009 09:02:39 by ArcrftLvr
A Question About DCA? Is It In WN's Future? posted Mon Nov 24 2008 00:01:21 by AAFLT1871
WN Hiring Process Question? posted Fri Aug 15 2008 04:41:43 by SWASFLA
WN N270WN (non-winglet 73G) Question posted Tue Nov 20 2007 11:37:16 by Tom in NO