Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LAX Is #1 In Serious Near-collisions  
User currently offlineQANTAS747-438 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1984 posts, RR: 2
Posted (13 years 5 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1070 times:

I was sad to read this in the SUN June 24 LA Times.

quote: "The FAA report released concluded that LAX had the nations highest number of serious near-collisions from 1997 to 2000. During that time there were 13 serious incidents at LAX: 1 in 1997, 2 in 1998, 5 in 1999 and 5 in 2000."

It goes on...

"...For years, LAX has wrestled with improving runway safety. Pilots and controllers say many near misses are related to the airfields configuration..."

Pilots and ATC say that the reason that these 13 serious incidents have happened... 80% of which were on the southern (25L/R) runways (on the right side of this picture)... is because of the layout of the runways, where as landings are done on the outer runways, and take-offs on the inner.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Sean Woodard



"...For 40 years, pilots have touched down on runways closest to the cities of El Segundo and Westchester and taken off from runways closest to terminals to cut down on noise. But the problem is that this step requires pilots to drive from outside runways across inside runways to the terminals---a maneuver that caused many of the near-collisions at LAX."

Their solution---

"The proposal to swap runways has been criticized by controlers, who say that doing so would cut down on the number of departures that the airport could handle and compromise safety further than the current configuration. An ATC spokesperson said, 'If they were to change those runways, you would see a noticeable increase in runway incursions.' He added that moving the runways farther apart and adding parallel taxiways between runways on the north and south sides of the airfield, where pilots could stop and talk through instructions with controllers, would provide a much higher margin of safety."


What are your thoughts?


My posts/replies are strictly my opinion and not that of any company, organization, or Southwest Airlines.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is Dubai-LAX Possible In The Future? posted Mon May 16 2005 18:46:57 by SonicZoom87
AIRTRANSAT, Is In Very Serious Financial Trouble posted Thu Sep 27 2001 16:15:22 by Airtransam
Boeing In Serious 747 Talks With 3 Or 4 Airlines posted Thu Dec 7 2006 21:10:31 by NoWorries
LAX Upgrades In Progress -- Any Updates? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 17:06:46 by SRT75
747 LCF Is In The Air Again posted Tue Sep 26 2006 01:36:11 by RobK
YX, Who Else Is In The Running posted Sat Sep 9 2006 02:08:16 by ATWZW170
Is This Anywhere Near A Tailstrike? posted Mon Jul 31 2006 12:42:05 by Drinkstrolley
F-WWAI (A343) Is In New Colours posted Sun Jul 30 2006 10:56:07 by AirbusA346
Any BLR -AMS Nonstop Prospects In The Near Future posted Sat Jul 15 2006 00:45:35 by Boeing747_600
No Deal Reached For Mesaba--Court Is In Session posted Thu May 18 2006 22:12:51 by LUVRSW