Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TAM To Be Fined For Charging For Exit Seats  
User currently offlineRafabozzolla From Brazil, joined Apr 2000, 1227 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2717 times:

São Paulo's state consumer rights protection agency (Procon) is set to fine TAM for charging extra for first row and exit seats. According to the agency, the airline can only charge extra when there is a difference in the service offered. It argues that the extra space provided by such seats is not a perk since it is mandated by the law and safety regulations.

TAM has fifteen days to appeal the fine.

The link to the story, in Portuguese

http://g1.globo.com/economia/negocio...cobranca-de-espaco-em-assento.html

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinebj87 From Netherlands, joined Jun 2009, 448 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2579 times:

Quoting Rafabozzolla (Thread starter):
It argues that the extra space provided by such seats is not a perk since it is mandated by the law and safety regulations.

On one hand I think that is a valid point because the airline does not make an extra investment in order to offer this product. On the other hand the airline does have the option of putting you somewhere else with less room. So if you want to be the one with the extra room you can pay to have a guaranteed exit row seat.


User currently offlinenighthawk From UK - Scotland, joined Sep 2001, 5135 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2494 times:

Seems a bit daft really, the airline should be able to charge however they like - if people are prepared to pay it, then let them. The exit row seats offer more space, so they should be entitled to charge more if people want to choose to sit there.

However if a passenger is made to sit there, then they shouldnt be charged extra.



That'll teach you
User currently offlinepar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 7135 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2300 times:

Quoting nighthawk (Reply 2):
However if a passenger is made to sit there, then they shouldnt be charged extra.

So do you then block those seats off to ensure that only those willing to pay extra can select them along with putting up a disclaimer at booking that those who want the extra room must be healthy and not person's with an ailment such as a broken leg in a cast who require more leg room?

It's a safety issue which airlines may attempt to take advantage of, personally I say leave well enough alone, if you want to charge for extra leg room, put in some rows, once you go down that slope you can open up a whole can of worms. Example, there are folks who can sit in standard seats but require a seat belt extension, we are already charging some folks for extra seats if their size requires it, so how about charging for the seat belt extension?


User currently offlineXT6Wagon From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 3396 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1945 times:

way around this is offer these people a pre-takeoff beverage as part of the deal. Or something. Just a token item to dodge the "extra space is required by law so not something you can charge for" part of the ruling.

User currently offlinem404 From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2226 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (3 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1615 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

One wonders if a US carrier that already charges for these seats could do it out of Brazil?


Less sarcasm and more thought equal better understanding
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
SK To Be Fined For Chinese Attendants posted Tue May 30 2006 21:32:39 by EuroBonus
Bloomberg :Virgin LHR Slots To Be Up For Bids? posted Wed Mar 23 2011 08:42:16 by yeogeo
737-600 To Be Broken Up For Parts posted Fri May 21 2010 00:29:55 by oykie
Early 777-200 To Be Broken-Up For The First Time posted Wed Nov 15 2006 10:35:03 by Leelaw
LGW To Be Put Up For Sale? posted Sun Jun 4 2006 13:55:19 by VV701
Shaping Up To Be A Bumper Year For A&B posted Fri May 27 2005 00:19:25 by Art
Outlook: 747s To Be Produced For Years To Come... posted Mon Nov 15 2004 22:39:27 by DIA
Tiger Airways To Be Low Cost For Staff Too. posted Fri Apr 23 2004 03:33:14 by Cx flyboy
Klagenfurt To Be New Destination For HLX! posted Wed Jul 16 2003 19:51:35 by RJ100
Best Airline To BE A Flight Attendant For posted Tue Aug 15 2000 21:27:04 by Randy1676