Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LHR T5... Long Narrow Walkways...  
User currently offlineAndz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8443 posts, RR: 10
Posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 10672 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was trolling Google Earth and I was looking at some of the walkways leading to the jet bridges at LHR T5. Some of them look very long!

Do they have windows? Aren't they a bit claustrophobic?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v155/andzz/T5.jpg


After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinespeedmarque From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 684 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 10662 times:

Hi

One side is all glass.

Cheers


User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2815 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 10566 times:

Look at LHR380's pics on the LHR news #6 thread. The jetties at T5 all come with a view. It's great that Google Earth has been updated at long last. Though of course with so much work occuring at LHR, the pics from last summer are already out of date. Unfortunately, Google Earth is not a tool to keep up to date on the works progress. Driving the off motorway route to work is.

User currently offlinelhr380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 10117 times:

http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/208260_10150157181326466_599326465_7083220_1744084_n.jpg



Here ya go,

This is pics of the jettys on the right of T5C.


User currently offlineHiJazzey From Saudi Arabia, joined Sep 2005, 864 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 9897 times:

I'm sorry but these are just ridiculous. Why not have the satellite run all the way down? A raised podium construction would allow them to keep that staging area / BHS / whatever it is / on the ground floor.

User currently offlinejetblast From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 1231 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 9894 times:

Quoting HiJazzey (Reply 4):
I'm sorry but these are just ridiculous.

How is it 'ridiculous'? Is it really that different from walking in the terminal?



Speedbird Concorde One
User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4805 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 9730 times:

Quoting HiJazzey (Reply 4):
I'm sorry but these are just ridiculous. Why not have the satellite run all the way down? A raised podium construction would allow them to keep that staging area / BHS / whatever it is / on the ground floor.

I would think that these are cheaper than tunneling, they also mean that they are on the same level without the need for escalators and lifts (think wheelchairs etc). They also provide more flexibility (ie they can be repositioned at a later date or modified, a tunnel is fixed and hard to modify).



56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineAndz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8443 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 9559 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for the pics guys.


After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11616 posts, RR: 60
Reply 8, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 9181 times:

Quoting HiJazzey (Reply 4):
I'm sorry but these are just ridiculous. Why not have the satellite run all the way down?

I have to agree in thinking it's a very architecturally dissatisfying design. When I think of the money spent on T5, I find it amazing that they decided to save a few million by shortening the remote piers.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlinecschleic From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1246 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 8872 times:

They're particularly fun if you're running to get to the plane before they close the door, having run through all of T-5 due to baggage system problems.

Looking at aerial photos, I wonder if the plan is to eventually extend the satellite buildings and replace the long jet bridges when traffic warrants it.


User currently offlinetimf From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 969 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 8342 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Are those HSBC buildings used to separate arriving passengers, or what purpose do they serve? If the former, I assume there's also a network of equally long underground tunnels?

User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11616 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 7999 times:

Quoting timf (Reply 10):
Are those HSBC buildings used to separate arriving passengers, or what purpose do they serve? If the former, I assume there's also a network of equally long underground tunnels?

So far as I understand the walkways are bidirectional. The rectangular structures linking the walkway to the air bridges at each stand are in perfect line with those serving gates situated along the actual pier, hence it's possible the design has been intentionally future proofed to enable the extension of the pier building along the entire length of the stands at some point in the future. It will all be in the planning documents somewhere, but to me they look like a temporary solution.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineYYZAMS From Canada, joined Feb 2011, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 7850 times:

Beats having to bus all the way out there like in other airports.
I am sure one day that terminal might be extended out if needed allowing for even more gates and getting rid of the long jet bridge or jet way or whatever you might call it.


User currently offlineNorthstarBoy From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1825 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 7200 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

thanks for the pics, but what's VS doing parked at T5? I can imagine someone at BA coughed up a brick when they discovered that had happened.


Why are people so against low yields?! If lower yields means more people can travel abroad, i'm all for it
User currently offlineskipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3199 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 7133 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 8):

I have to agree in thinking it's a very architecturally dissatisfying design. When I think of the money spent on T5, I find it amazing that they decided to save a few million by shortening the remote piers.

They saved a few million quid. Welcome to the real world of commercial reality. Virgin et al have been parked remote at T5 since before it was opened, nothing new there.


User currently offlineEK413 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 4871 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 7105 times:

Quoting Andz (Thread starter):

It's awful my opinion but if there isn't enough demand to justify the concourse being built to its full extent why invest money in the project now when it could be better spent on other improvements to the airport...
Personally I prefer a bus transfer to my aircraft, I love getting high on the aviation fumes 

EK413



Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. We are tonight’s entertainment!
User currently offlinefbgdavidson From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 3701 posts, RR: 28
Reply 16, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 7048 times:

Quoting timf (Reply 10):

Are those HSBC buildings used to separate arriving passengers, or what purpose do they serve? If the former, I assume there's also a network of equally long underground tunnels?

The jetbridges and arrivals are on the same level in the satellites. From departures you drop down one level after going through the gate to enter the jetbridge. The doors at the end of the jetbridge are closed when the jetbridge is handling arriving passengers to prevent arrivals and departures intermingling.



"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
User currently offlinelhr380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 6179 times:

Quoting NorthstarBoy (Reply 13):
thanks for the pics, but what's VS doing parked at T5? I can imagine someone at BA coughed up a brick when they discovered that had happened.

As T5C is not operational at the moment, it is used for parking stands for T3 flights that don't need to be at a gate, AA VS QF AC and Ethiopian have used those stands. No reason for "Cough up a brick" as you put it.


User currently offlinelhr380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 6125 times:

Quoting timf (Reply 10):
Are those HSBC buildings used to separate arriving passengers, or what purpose do they serve? If the former, I assume there's also a network of equally long underground tunnels?

Its got a office for the TRM in the bottom of it, and a lift to take anything that needs to be put in the hold. Outsize hand-baggage, buggy's, wheelchairs etc.


User currently offlinejust7four7 From Hong Kong, joined Oct 2009, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 5847 times:

Here what it is: Airport Authorities just have different philosophies.

BAA's the most aggressive, like it or not: Save cost and bridge aircraft as far away possible to make most efficient use of a minimum-area concourse/satellite. A lower level of service to passengers, with gate lounge far away and a long tunnel-like walk to aircraft.

Other airports: Strike a balance between cost (extent of concourse/satellite) and length of bridge to last gated aircraft position. A higher level of service to passengers, where gate areas with seating/waiting is never too far away.

To be mentioned: Air-conditioning makes long, narrow (and glazed) bridges more costly, in hotter climates. Not an issue in LHR.


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11616 posts, RR: 60
Reply 20, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 5779 times:

Quoting skipness1E (Reply 14):
They saved a few million quid. Welcome to the real world of commercial reality.

Indeed, I know it well unfortunately. Still disappointing though...



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlinelhr380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 5687 times:

Quoting just7four7 (Reply 22):
A lower level of service to passengers, with gate lounge far away and a long tunnel-like walk to aircraft.

Gate lounges are not far away though. They are right next to the gates. You get your boarding pass scanned go down the escalator and your on the jetty. The longest one only takes a few minutes to walk down as well. I don't see a lower level of service at all in the set up. There is more space on the apron level for transport and baggage trolleys to move around without the building being in the way, and its using the space wisely, because as we ALL know, LHR is packed and needs to expand.


User currently offlineCricket From India, joined Aug 2005, 2967 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 5734 times:

It is actually not that bad, my flight BA 287 to SFO last month was at one of these bridges, quite a hoof, but, it goes faster than you think. At least there are rarely queues in front of the aircraft. The only issue is when you arrive at one of these gates after a long flight and really don't want to walk so much when you're so groggy/drunk


A300B2/B4/6R, A313, A319/320/321, A333, A343, A388, 737-2/3/4/7/8/9, 747-3/4, 772/2E/2L/3, E170/190, F70, CR2/7, 146-3,
User currently offlinelhr380 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 5027 times:

Quoting HiJazzey (Reply 28):
A good 5 minutes or more, with the elderly and those with children holding up the pace.

That would be the reason why a announcement is made giving people with reduced mobility or children or other needs allowing them to board first giving them time to make there way to the gate.

Its been working well in T5B since it opened, T5C, is no different.


User currently onlinefcogafa From United Kingdom, joined May 2008, 775 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 5031 times:

If the buildings were longer and the piers shorter it would still be the same distance to walk the gate, you just walk further in the building than the pier......

25 Cricket : The point being that one can sit in the building. As I said, it isn't so bad as a passenger when boarding (twice over I've had looooong walks) but ca
26 Bongodog1964 : It appears that the reason for the long airbridges is to give space for the access roads to the service tunnels.
27 rtfm : You can still sit in the building....What's the difference? A short walk, sit, then a long walk to the gate. Or a long walk, sit then a short walk to
28 TimRees : You generally have to be quite fit at most airports - the walks these days are very long! LHR does have some long walks, but having recently transited
29 Cricket : Very fit, just try DEL T3 if you get one of the far-off gates, which always seem to happen to me on domestic flights. Nothing beats AMS in terms of i
30 worldliner : On my first trip to T5 we parked at one of the stands with the long walkways, and it seemed to go on forever but was never claustrophobic, alot of peo
31 CXfirst : Well, for one, if the building extended further, there would be more space in the building, and therefore more space for seats, which equals more com
32 GolfBravoRomeo : In the arial view, on the lower right are 2 gates with 3 jet ways. Are those A380 gates?
33 LHR27C : Correct.
34 LHRBlueskies : Actually, under new management, there are fewer shops across LHR then previously planned, all part of the desire to improve passenger focus and comfo
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LHR T5: Agent # Per Flight -> Cost Effective? posted Wed Jul 28 2010 16:06:00 by SNATH
ET 757 At LHR T5? Why? posted Tue Jul 20 2010 13:41:51 by kiwiandrew
Any Pics Of LHR T5 Today With Non-BA Tails? posted Sat Mar 20 2010 07:10:12 by speedmarque
Baggage Problems At LHR T5 posted Sun Jun 28 2009 08:22:08 by SeansasLCY
''Flash Mob'' Hundreds Protest Inside LHR T5 posted Sat Jan 17 2009 08:28:42 by OA260
LHR T5 - How's It Coping? posted Sat Oct 25 2008 08:49:12 by Aware
BBC: LHR T5 Int Arrivals "unchecked" posted Sun May 11 2008 08:36:47 by Jamesontheroad
LHR T5- Finally Running Smoothly? posted Thu Apr 10 2008 12:51:37 by A350
LHR T5: Automated Baggage Sorting System Fails posted Sat Apr 5 2008 03:51:07 by SINGAPORE_AIR
LHR-T5-Baggage Handlers At Fault? posted Tue Apr 1 2008 14:03:55 by TonyBurr