Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airlines:Live And Let Die !  
User currently offlineAccrama From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1088 times:

I was recently shocked to know that Pan Am is restarting YET AGAIN ! Haven't they learned?

If we recall correctly, the original Pan Am took over National Airlines.

This year National Airlines will start services YET AGAIN ALSO !

Why do people keep thinking that reviving an airline's legendary name will help boost their sales?

Any comment?

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 891 times:

Not to be anal or anything, but both Pan Am and National have already started operations, Pan Am with 727's, and National with 757's.
(www.flypanam.com www.nationalairlines.com)

As for National, I don't believe that they chose the name for the "legendary name" ...they just wanted something to describe what they plan to become. It seems as if they don't want any other part but the name, otherwise you'd see that Godawful "SUNKING" plastered to the tail, along with planes named "Mary" and "Dynah".

FLY777UAL


User currently offlineMarkdc10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 878 times:

I think its great that someone is using the great names of yester year. Actually National has been flying for some months now and from what I've heard their doing pretty good. My guess as to why they picked the name National was due in part to the great reputation the orginal National had. As for Pan Am! That one is too early to call yet. Maybe they'll make it as a niche carrier.

User currently offlineMarkdc10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 872 times:

LOL Hey Fly777UAL I liked the sunking. Also thought the idea of naming the airplanes was a pretty good slogan at the time.

User currently offlineDelta737 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 516 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 876 times:

Hey 777-

Personally, I thought the sun king was pretty cool, but keep in mind that the year that National was using that image. Of course the idea is goofy in the 90's but consider that people are already looking back and grimacing when they hear "Rhapsody in Blue".

I think the reason that a lot of airlines are buying old airline names is for two reasons (of course I may be wrong).... But the first reason is probably because all of the good airline names are already gone. Think of a good, professional airline name and it's already been used. With a previous name and an updated livery, voila, you save millions on trial and error for your corporate image.

Secondly, some of the public probably feels a small bit more comfortable flying on the "new" National as opposed to someone like a never name like "Jet Blue" or whoever those folks are in JFK.

Besides, most folks don't know what an "LP" or a "45" are, better yet know that Pan Am (new) isn't the old Pan Am and surely they don't remember who National was.

I wouldn't be suprised to see someone use "C&S" for an upstart name.

Doug Taylor
Delta 737 Pilot
http://www.mindspring.com/~dltaylor (new updates!)


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 4 days ago) and read 847 times:

I guess it's just a "sign of the times"--- I do kind of like National's "Airline of the Stars" slogan, though!  

FLY777UAL


User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1318 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 846 times:

Hey,there are many of us out here that have very fond memories the "SUN KING". Flying was truly special back then,not like the cattle call of today. Airlines,such as the old National did not have to run commercials stating they are reaching excellence as a goal,service was already excellent. Oh the memories.

User currently offlinePilot1113 From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2333 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 838 times:

I have to agree with Dougie (Delta737) on this call. All the good names have already been used.

Let's take an original name that is going to a new carrier that is starting up some in the near future called "Jet Anywair." Now, if that isn't the most god awful name I have ever heard of, I don't know what is. That is a true sign of all the good names being used up.

BTW, I don't think "JetBlue" is bad. It isn't great either, but 500% better than "Jet Anywair." I can't take that name seriously, makes me think it's an airline that you'd find in MS Flight Simulator.

- Neil Harrison

P.S. Yes, "Jet Anywair" is a true airline. It was in Aviation Week Magazine. I'm not joking here... okay... you have to stop laughing...



User currently offlineCharles802 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 380 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 3 days ago) and read 831 times:

The new National scheme is just fine...it is right for the 90s. I certainly would not want to fly on any airplane with a reference to Louis XIV! I think National made a good marketing decision, because they are keeping the name, AND keeping a high level of service.

User currently offlineDucker From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 137 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 3 days ago) and read 829 times:

Who cares if a new airline uses the same name as a defunct airline? Each new airline exists because investors choose to invest in these airlines. PanAm is still a known name to many travellers, obviously important to the investors. As for National, it ceased to exist in 1980 with the merger

User currently offlineSEA nw DC10 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 491 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 827 times:

Personally, I think that it is great to see airlines back into service that went under a few years ago. It's not bad they are using the same name, there are all new employees. I wish both National and Pan Am luck in the future, 'tis great to see those birds up and flying once again!  

User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 11, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 821 times:

Does anybody find this ironic: The original PanAm bought National for an hugely inflated price, which contributed to their downfall (of course Lockerbie was the death-blow) in the early 80's. And the newer PanAm bought Carnival Airlines, and that contributed to their fall. I just hope that the latest PanAm realises the earlier PanAm mistakes, and will refrain from buying any airlines before they have a well capitalised safety net to fall upon.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineMarkdc10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 815 times:

Sorry to disagree with you LH423 but National wasn't the downfall of Pan Am. Pan Am's troubles started back in the late 60s when they decided to buy a huge fleet of 747s. It wasn't until around 1976 or so that Pan Am was able to produce a profit. As a former National flight attendant, all I can say is there wasn't one person I talked to at NA that wanted Pan Am to buy us. Pan Am on the other hand just had to have us and once they got us, found they couldn't operate a domestic route system. Also mis management caused the demise of Pan Am. Not National.

User currently offlineAccrama From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (15 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 807 times:

Excellent answer LH423, I agree with you completely.
=)


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Planes In "Live And Let Die" (1973)? posted Wed Aug 18 2004 14:32:23 by BENNETT123
Airlines:Live And Let Die ! posted Fri Oct 22 1999 04:08:49 by Accrama
Identity Of Pan Am 747 In Livan And Let Die posted Mon May 15 2000 01:27:45 by Goooooaaal
Midwest Airlines Slots And Gates At DCA And LGA posted Thu Dec 14 2006 21:49:30 by Quickmover
Airlines, Alliances And Frequent Flyer Miles posted Mon Dec 4 2006 13:55:25 by FlightLover
Miat (Mongolian Airlines)'s Fleet And Routes posted Mon Nov 20 2006 04:39:45 by Centrair
Regional Airlines RFPs And The Future Of Them posted Wed Nov 15 2006 07:39:34 by Apodino
Location Of Airlines' FF And/or Elite Members posted Mon Oct 2 2006 05:56:54 by CODCAIAH
Malaysian Airlines New C And posted Mon Apr 3 2006 22:02:18 by Qantas744ER
Sun Country Airlines Food And Other Questions posted Mon Feb 13 2006 07:42:01 by TWA902fly