Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Didnt The 747X Have Any Success?  
User currently offlineSushka From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 4784 posts, RR: 13
Posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1957 times:

Why didnt any airlines get the 747X? It seems like a pretty nice plane to me. It carries more people, than the last 747 and it flys almost at the speed of sound! I was wondering why the airlines that have had the 747 for a long time like Singapore and Virgin Atlantic ordered the A380 instead of the 747X. What is wrong with the 747X?

Pershoyu Spravoyu Litaki!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineHypermike From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 1001 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1932 times:

This has the potential of becoming an AvB fight.

I think the economics of the A380 look pretty good. High density seating with great range means lower CSMs.

Oh, did I just use CSMs as a reference? ACK!

User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1928 times:

I don't think they really took it seriously enough...

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8360 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1907 times:

I think the biggest issue that kind of conspired against the 747X series was the fact the plane did not offer any speed advantages over the current 747-400, nor did it offer a massive increase in seating space like the A380 offered.

However, it appears Boeing may be preparing to give new life to the 747. There is now talk of a 747 using the fuselage length of the 747X (not 747X Stretch), with slight area ruling of the fuselage, new wing with either raked wingtips or Aviation Partners winglets, and the choice of GP7200 or Trent 900 series engines. This will result in a 747 that carries 440 passengers cruising at circa Mach 0.90 with a range of nearly 9,000 nautical miles. A freighter variant off this new 747 could carry a full payload over 6,500 nautical miles, eliminating the Anchorage, AK (ANC) stopover for fuel on transpacific flights.

I think because of the very long range and very high cruise speed of the proposed 747 variant, once the economy picks up again expect a fairly large number of airlines to be quite interested in buying this new 747. This would essentially give most of the advantages of the Sonic Cruiser proposal, but would actually carry more passengers than the current 744 and can just about fly the LHR-SYD route non-stop. Another important advantage is the fact this proposed new 747 would require half the development cost of the A380, so Boeing could price the plane quite competitively.

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13603 posts, RR: 76
Reply 4, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1872 times:

Remember in 1996/97, when Boeing were proposing -500/600/700 series 747's, then suddenly cancelled them? Maybe airlines were a bit wary this time around.
It must have disheartening for Boeing this time around when some of their best customers went for A380 instead of 747X.

User currently offlineSushka From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 4784 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1867 times:

Yeah but still I would think that airlines would get the proven 747 instead of the new Airbus A380.
If I only had my own airline... Big grin

Pershoyu Spravoyu Litaki!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Skip The A360 Designation? Any Ideas? posted Sat Jun 10 2006 14:02:51 by Art
Why Wasn't The Tupolev TU-144 A Success? posted Tue Apr 12 2005 17:15:06 by Alberchico
Why Does The 777 Have 3 Rear Nav Lights? posted Fri Dec 12 2003 19:41:31 by AV8AJET
Why Does The 747 Have It's Abnormal Structure? posted Tue Jan 29 2002 04:16:12 by Legolars
Why Build The 747x posted Wed Aug 2 2000 05:59:04 by Nasmal
Why Does The CRJ Have A High Angle Of Attack posted Fri Feb 18 2000 21:49:44 by LH423
Why Didnt UA Order The A330? posted Fri Sep 29 2006 21:08:39 by BoeingFever777
Why Is The 737-8 Bigger Success Than The 737-4 Was posted Sun Apr 2 2006 13:56:50 by Vfw614
U Have Any Theory Why WCA MD-82 Went Down? posted Sat Aug 27 2005 19:34:13 by D5DBY
Does Boeing Have Any Plans To Extend The 757? posted Tue Jul 13 2004 03:48:24 by TriJetFan1