Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
KE IDB Cancer Patient Despite M.D. Note  
User currently offlinenyc2theworld From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 666 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3394 times:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42966030...ent-denied-seat-korean-air-flight/

The only question I have is the two different note the family got, were they from the same Dr or different DRs? I really would like to see KE explain themselves out of this one.


Always wonderers if this "last and final boarding call" is in fact THE last and final boarding call.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20347 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3378 times:

I believe that an airline may refuse to transport someone. A doctor's note is just that: it's not a guarantee. The doctor is not standing at the gate or flying with the lady. Maybe if he were, they'd let her fly.

User currently offlineNumero4 From Canada, joined Feb 2010, 260 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

Looks like DL didn't miss such an easy publicity opportunity.


CYQB
User currently offlineeta unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2089 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3031 times:

Easy for KE to explain: if the pax looked unwell enough to travel, then that's grounds to deny boarding whether clutching a doctor's note or not. Also, MEDA cases need to be cleared by an airline's head office mediacal dept.

User currently offlineyyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16367 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2461 times:

Good for KE for exercising caution and good judgement. The cancer is of course unfortunate but that is no excuse for risking a medical diversion or infight death or illness.

If I ever need a better guarantee of an ontime flight to South Korea, I am (now) more likely to opt for KE than DL.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineFly2yyz From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 1046 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2238 times:

Despite what the majority of the people on msnbc.com think about this, I whole heartedly support KE on this matter. It is the airline right to allow or deny a person the right to travel. I mean if anything were to have happened and the aircraft had to make a medical diversion...I mean hello...Why should KE have to explain themself?! It is their right. I don't know why people are getting all hyped up about this...

User currently offlinecanadianpylon From Canada, joined May 2003, 314 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2137 times:

We live in a risk averse society anymore. You're damned if you do, and you're damned if you don't.

In this case, deny boarding because of a perceived medical condition, you inconvenience 1 person (which costs $). Allow the boarding, and a medical intervention is required mid-flight, you inconvenience the whole flight (which also costs $$$$). It is less risky to deny boarding to one person, rather than potentially have to divert a flight.

So in this case, IMHO, you're damned if you do, and less damned is you don't.



Always looking for the longest route with the most transfers.
User currently offlinecanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2843 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1916 times:

DL is going to fly her now. An update from the earlier story about this:

"After our story aired Monday night, Korean Air added some more details about its handling of the situation.

Spokesperson Penny Pfaelzer said the airline put the Kims up in a hotel as they tried to get the proper authorization for Crystal to fly. Pfaelzer said all airlines have policies and procedures to deal with passengers with medical conditions. She said if someone was to die in flight, other passengers on the plane would be "traumatized," not to mention those family members traveling with the person. She called it a truly unfortunate situation, but the airline is doing all it can to accommodate Crystal, who they believe is very ill and may not be up for the long flight."

http://www.king5.com/news/local/Airl...t-on-Sea-Tac-flight-121536104.html

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 1):
I believe that an airline may refuse to transport someone. A doctor's note is just that: it's not a guarantee. The doctor is not standing at the gate or flying with the lady. Maybe if he were, they'd let her fly.

Absolutely, flying isn't a right, it's a privilege. I may be wrong, but airlines refuse to transport people based on medical status all the time. Including women that are over 8 months pregnant or there are cases where you may not be transported if you require full time oxygen.



The beatings will continue until morale improves
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
KE At ATL posted Sat Nov 20 2010 12:22:35 by will777
New Special Livery For KE - Pyeongchang 2018 posted Sat Oct 9 2010 18:59:37 by HOONS90
KE's Service At DFW posted Fri Oct 8 2010 14:09:58 by ssides
KE Releases 2010 Global Ad posted Thu Sep 2 2010 01:22:12 by kalsky
When Did KE Deploy 744s On KE23/24 To SFO posted Mon Aug 9 2010 23:40:13 by fortunerunnner
What's Happened To KE On ICN-SEA-MEX? posted Fri Jul 30 2010 20:21:21 by wedgetail737
KE To IKT? posted Tue Jul 27 2010 12:28:00 by Fly2YYZ
KE Starts ICN-YYC For 1 Month 07/25/10 posted Fri Jul 23 2010 08:13:23 by C172Akula
Am 763 Does The KE 777-two-step Landing Narita posted Fri Jun 25 2010 22:27:27 by BN747
KE 6 Breathtaking TV Commercial posted Sun Jun 20 2010 23:40:36 by kalsky