Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing / ANA Flying 787 In Japan In July  
User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 7125 posts, RR: 63
Posted (4 years 16 hours ago) and read 14837 times:

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...st-787-in-august-or-september.html

The airframer will work with ANA to deploy the second flight test aircraft, ZA002, on flights within Japan during the week of 4 July to "simulate in-service operations across several airports in Japan in a service ready operational validation", said Boeing.

The flights are expected to be operated between Tokyo Haneda airport and airports in Osaka (both Itami and Kansai airports), Okayama and Hiroshima.


Hiroshima!                 

31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinetruemanQLD From Australia, joined Feb 2007, 1676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (4 years 15 hours ago) and read 14658 times:

Interesting but is it really necessary? I know Airbus did it with the A380 to the main airports but that was a lot different.

User currently offlinefrigatebird From Netherlands, joined Jun 2008, 1745 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (4 years 14 hours ago) and read 14454 times:

I'm a bit surprised ZA002 will be used. Sure, it has the ANA colors, but wouldn't ZA004 be more useful? At least ZA004 has a passenger cabin (albeit partially installed), isn't something that needs testing in "service ready operational validation"?


146,318/19/20/21,AB6,332,343,345,388,722,732/3/4/5/G/8,9,742,74E,744,752,762,763,772,77E,773,77W,AT4/7,ATP,CRK,E90,F50/7
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 32249 posts, RR: 85
Reply 3, posted (4 years 14 hours ago) and read 14418 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting frigatebird (Reply 2):
Sure, it has the ANA colors, but wouldn't ZA004 be more useful? At least ZA004 has a passenger cabin (albeit partially installed), isn't something that needs testing in "service ready operational validation"?

ZA004 will be part of the ETOPS and Functional Reliability testing starting in about two weeks so I don't think it will be available.

It sounds like what ZA002 will be doing is ground operations - motor along taxiways, park at a gate, allow the jet bridge and service vehicles to make connections, etc. So there is no need to have seating.


User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12710 posts, RR: 80
Reply 4, posted (4 years 12 hours ago) and read 14054 times:

Quoting truemanQLD (Reply 1):
Interesting but is it really necessary?

If you're launch customer says its necessary, it's necessary.

Quoting frigatebird (Reply 2):
I'm a bit surprised ZA002 will be used. Sure, it has the ANA colors, but wouldn't ZA004 be more useful? At least ZA004 has a passenger cabin (albeit partially installed), isn't something that needs testing in "service ready operational validation"?

ZA004 doesn't have a full passenger cabin, that's ZA003.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 3):
ZA004 will be part of the ETOPS and Functional Reliability testing starting in about two weeks so I don't think it will be available.

There are multiple web sources claiming ETOPS will be on ZA102...the only web sources I can find saying it will be on ZA004 are really really old (2+ years).

Tom.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 32249 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (4 years 12 hours ago) and read 13900 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 4):
There are multiple web sources claiming ETOPS will be on ZA102...the only web sources I can find saying it will be on ZA004 are really really old (2+ years).

ZA004 is being fitted with the Trent 1000 Package B engines so I would think Boeing would want to use it to test that combination of airframe and engine.


User currently offlinemogandoCI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (4 years 12 hours ago) and read 13875 times:

did ANA announce their route intentions for the 787 ?

User currently offlineUnited787 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2941 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (4 years 12 hours ago) and read 13827 times:

Quoting tdscanuck (Reply 4):
ZA004 doesn't have a full passenger cabin, that's ZA003.

I thought it was only a partial cabin on the 003???


User currently offlineRonaldo747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 410 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 12 hours ago) and read 13767 times:

IIRC it's planned since a long time ago and not uncommon. Such flights without passenger was done with 737NG and 777 as well.

Wonder if Boeing/ANA will making some proving (passenger) flights with ZA102 (which has the full cabin) after ETOPS flying and prior delivery (similar like the A380 proving flights)

[Edited 2011-05-26 07:17:11]

User currently offlinebueb0g From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2010, 736 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (4 years 11 hours ago) and read 13664 times:

Quoting United787 (Reply 7):
I thought it was only a partial cabin on the 003???

IIRC 04 flew before 03, maybe that's what's throwing you - perhaps you're getting mixed up with ZA003 and "the third" frame?



Roger roger, what's our vector, victor?
User currently offline7673mech From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 770 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (4 years 11 hours ago) and read 13391 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting truemanQLD (Reply 1):
Interesting but is it really necessary? I know Airbus did it with the A380 to the main airports but that was a lot different

Why is it a lot different?
Each aircraft has it's unique needs and challenges.
Anything that can ensure a smooth EIS is beneficial.


User currently offlinecalibansa333 From United States of America, joined Sep 2009, 208 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (4 years 10 hours ago) and read 12650 times:

Quoting 7673mech (Reply 10):
Why is it a lot different?

I think trueman is referring to the size of the a380 and the fact that the airlines wanted to make sure such a large aircraft would operate without problems (taxiing, gate service for two decks, new equipment etc.) before deploying it. The 787 is a pretty average size aircraft so there's not much new to compensate for besides the new systems. I suspect integration of the 787 will be quite easy and I suspect that's what trueman thought as well.


User currently offlineRG787 From Brazil, joined Nov 2010, 144 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (4 years 9 hours ago) and read 11864 times:

Maybe it has something to do with the ETOPS approval... I remember reading somewhere Japan requested one year of flying before approving a new type to ETOPS.

User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 32249 posts, RR: 85
Reply 13, posted (4 years 9 hours ago) and read 11792 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting RG787 (Reply 12):
Maybe it has something to do with the ETOPS approval... I remember reading somewhere Japan requested one year of flying before approving a new type to ETOPS.

Yes, NH and JL will need to demonstrate one year of service before they will be granted their ETOPS Operator (?) Certificates.

But I really think this is more for "airport familiarization" so NH can see exactly how a 787-8 will integrate at airports it will first see service at and finalize their Ground Ops procedures and policies.


User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 876 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (4 years 9 hours ago) and read 11325 times:

Quoting truemanQLD (Reply 1):
Interesting but is it really necessary? I know Airbus did it with the A380 to the main airports but that was a lot different.

I suspect their pilots will be receiving training on the aircraft as well.



...are we there yet?
User currently offlineflylku From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 876 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (4 years 8 hours ago) and read 11300 times:

Quoting flylku (Reply 14):
I suspect their pilots will be receiving training on the aircraft as well.

... and ground crew familiarization as well.



...are we there yet?
User currently offlinegoblin211 From United States of America, joined Jun 2010, 1209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (4 years 8 hours ago) and read 11156 times:

Looks like a beautiful day coming up for ANA and the Japanese. How long will each flight take?


From the airport with love
User currently offlinejessbp From UK - Wales, joined Dec 2010, 75 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (4 years 8 hours ago) and read 10760 times:

Awesome stuff. I'm out in Tokyo from July the 6th staying in a hotel with a view out towards haneda, right below the flight path. I'll be keeping my camera on standby.

User currently offlinebkircher From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (4 years 8 hours ago) and read 10618 times:

ZA003 has the passenger cabin. Not 4. Ive been on both. And yes this flight is necessary, because its a customer proving trip.

User currently offlinercair1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2009, 1421 posts, RR: 52
Reply 19, posted (4 years 3 hours ago) and read 8350 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT

Quoting flylku (Reply 14):
I suspect their pilots will be receiving training on the aircraft as well.

I was at BFI last week and the 'guide' at the concorde display mentioned that there was ANA crew training going on right now in Seattle. He said it was quite common to see them doing patterns an T&G's. Alas, I did not see any, though I did see a number of 787 fly-overs where I was north of BFI. Amazingly quiet....



rcair1
User currently offlinetrent1000 From Japan, joined Jan 2007, 584 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (4 years ago) and read 7137 times:

June is also the rainy season here with a warm front extending over Kyushu and Honshu. This would help pilots experience how the plane handles in turbulence and wet weather landings/take offs.

User currently offlinejgw787 From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 208 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (3 years 12 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6438 times:

ill believe it when i see it

User currently offlinetdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12710 posts, RR: 80
Reply 22, posted (3 years 12 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6207 times:

Quoting United787 (Reply 7):
I thought it was only a partial cabin on the 003???

It depends what you mean by "full" and "partial." ZA003 was the airplane at Farnborough, there are lots of pictures in the a.net database. It has complete galleys, lavs, crew rests, sidewalls, bins, etc. It has seats in the nose and tail section. It doesn't have seats in the middle section because that's where the flight test data system is installed. All the different pieces are there, it basically just doesn't have a full compliment of seats.

Quoting bueb0g (Reply 9):
IIRC 04 flew before 03

Correct.

Tom.


User currently offlineJoeCanuck From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 5904 posts, RR: 32
Reply 23, posted (3 years 12 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 5962 times:

Every milestone that gets this project up and running, (or flying), as was intended is good and exciting. It should be a thrill and a relief for ANA to finally be flying the 787 at home airports.

They backed this thing...it's time to get some glory.



What the...?
User currently offlinefrigatebird From Netherlands, joined Jun 2008, 1745 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (3 years 12 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4836 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 13):
Yes, NH and JL will need to demonstrate one year of service before they will be granted their ETOPS Operator (?) Certificates.

JL intends start its 787 operations with BOS as their first destination though   Starting April 22, 2012. source



146,318/19/20/21,AB6,332,343,345,388,722,732/3/4/5/G/8,9,742,74E,744,752,762,763,772,77E,773,77W,AT4/7,ATP,CRK,E90,F50/7
25 Post contains images Stitch : I am going to guess they're referring to the upper end of the scale (180/24/0/330) for trans-pac operations between Japan and North/South America. Lo
26 Stitch : Here is part of Boeing's statement on the event, detailing what will be undertaken:
27 Post contains images yeogeo : Has ANA ever indicated what revenue flights they'll operate domestically and for how long before transitioning to international? I ask because I have
28 carpethead : Not yet. This is with good reason. NH probably has lost all confidence in Boeing's 787 certification program. Only thing they haven't is that it will
29 Burkhard : Wasn't first delivery planned for end of june? Now some test flying in July - when is the actual first delivery planned now?
30 carpethead : According to ANA, they are planning August or September for first delivery.
31 Post contains images Stitch : The current plan says end of Q3 2011, so a late July/early August delivery would actually be ahead of schedule.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing To Expand 787 Mod Line In San Antonio posted Wed Jan 23 2008 14:20:43 by TUIflyer
Will Boeing Display A Mockup Of The 787 In PAS? posted Thu Jun 14 2007 11:48:46 by LY777
~700 Orders By 787 Rollout In July '07 - ATW posted Fri Apr 20 2007 18:11:36 by Kbdude
CFO: Boeing To Use 787 Technology In Narrow-Body posted Tue Feb 14 2006 16:27:40 by Leelaw
Anyone Know Why Boeing Is Flying In Spokane? posted Mon Jun 13 2005 04:28:15 by KC135R
ANA Launches New Airline In July 2002. posted Sun Apr 29 2001 07:47:44 by Jiml1126
ANA Back To KUL In July posted Fri Apr 6 2001 21:30:32 by Jiml1126
Skywest To Transition Flying To IAH In 2011 posted Thu Oct 28 2010 21:19:19 by briguy1974
Boeing 747 Commuter Plane in Japan? posted Wed Sep 15 2010 14:50:42 by my1le
Why So Little Low-cost Flying In Japan (revisited) posted Sun Sep 5 2010 04:29:28 by sankaps