Bokratensa From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1137 times:
Some airplanes like 747, DC-10, A320, and A340 have distinctive look. But almost all other airliners look similar. How can you identify an airplane just by looking at it? Can anyone share some tips in how to recognize an airliner? Thanks,
Apuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3032 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 900 times:
When I look at a plane, I can tell what type it is, by looking at the aircraft as a whole. It's the combination of noseshape, engines, airline, landing gear, shape of tail,... that gives me the ability to identify a plane. But, after a while however, you can almost identify a plane just by looking at an engine, or the windshield.
You'll see, you'll gain some experience after a while!
Doug_or From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3402 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 870 times:
tailcone (beaver/scredriver style for 777 vs cone for A300)
and flap tracks (a300 has many more than 767 for instance)
are also very helpful.
down load a good side shot of all planes you are confused with and find the diffrences that you notice. just be carful when counting on winglets. many types (a310 A320 737 NG have them on only some planes)
Pronto From Canada, joined Mar 2000, 328 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 818 times:
Shape of nose, wing shape, tail shape. Different types which are similar, overwing exits(if you're close enough!) is the easiest way(A319/320, for example)), or a quick eyeball of windows behind front exit(737-500/300) - otherwise you'll be judging if it looks 'stubby' or not...
Compare the above. Look at the shape of the rear fuselage and you will see that on the A300 B4(No winglets), the keel curves all the way up to meet the APU while the top of the fuselage remains virtually flat all the way to the APU. Now look at the 767 and you will see that both lower and upper fuselage curve up and down to meet the APU roughly in the middle. This applies to almost all Airbus/Boeing A/C except the 737/747/777. Another way to tell the difference is to look at the flap track covers. The A300's are consierably larger and there are more of them (5 opposed to 3 on the 767). The shape of the canopy can also be a givaway. Both Airbus and Boeing have highly distinctive canopy shapes that are present thorughout their entire ranges.
Other things to look for are wing root fairings (Large 'bulge' on the 767, almost no-existant on the A300), window shape (If close enough) and undercarriage (6, 4 or 2 wheels.
Different versions of the same aircraft can be harder to identify but again there are subtle differences. Normally in fuselage length or winglets etc. On the 737's its best to look at the size of the fin, engine cowling shape and pitot head placement to get some idea of which is which.
SSTjumbo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 779 times:
Some things that I do are:
MD-80/717- listen for the sound of the engines as they fly overhead. the 717 will have a low, shrill whine due to the BR715 engines
A320/737- look at the tailfin. The A320's will look more like a 777's tail fin while the 737's front end of the tailfin will angle in to the fuselage. Also, listen for the sound in the air. The A320 will have a multi-pitched teapot whistle in the sound (I believe with the V2500 engines)
757's wings look a little like the 727's wings with less sweepback.
These are some of the ways I can identify aircraft.
EGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 11, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 735 times:
It really does just become knowledge after a while. Without looking at a distinguishing feature i can tell the difference between an A320 and a B737, simply because i know the shape is that type. Same with the A300 and B767.
B777 can become difficult sometimes because with the twin engined aircraft it does become a little more difficult, but it all becomes common knowledge after a while!
Fanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1964 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 649 times:
The 767 has more tapered wings, stabilizers, and tail, i.e., they end in a sharper point than with the French twin. The A300s flap track fairings are much more distinctive (and numerous) than those of the 767. The A300 is one of the few planes I can identify from the sound of its engines: for some reason, the A300s engines emit a louder sound than those of the 767, no matter what type of engines the Boeing product is equipped with. Why the A300 is so loud during approach is a mystery to me, as DC-10s, 747s, and 767s are also available with CF-6s.
The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery