Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ORD To Be DFW's Nearly A Twin?  
User currently offlineSSTjumbo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 965 times:

I looked at a picture of what is to be the new O'Hare proposed by Daley. The plan looks identical to what DFW is now. On two ends of the battery:

(-) This might be a desperation maneuver, no pun intended, to copy a proven airport layout like the one @ DFW which has far fewer congestion delays I think.

(+) If it is the case, it would work out very well for Chicago. I commute between ORD and DFW alot and it would be cool to see the planes take off and land over 294.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 937 times:


Yeah, DFW has one of the best layouts for an airport and it was used as a model in the new ORD plan, but I wouldn't call it a copy. Oh and planes already take off and land over I-294.



User currently offlineHighliner2 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 696 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 916 times:

Copy? Desperation move? If you want to get technical, DFW looks alot like Atlanta you know. Did DFW copy ATL? What about LAX, they use 4 parallels too? And of course congestion will be lower when the volume at DFW is less than ORD, and I would imagine the weather tends to be better as well. I agree that ORD, needs to be reconfigured, but I would'nt call anything a copy.


Go Cubs!
User currently offlineLsjef From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 908 times:

Not a copy at all. Just logical design.

Old airports like ORD evolved from grass strips which, for the light aircraft they accomodated, had runways aligned with prevailing winds. Today, all the new airports use parallel runway sets, and many of the older airports are slowly replacing their crossing runways with additional parallels.

Probably some brainiac did a complex computer model to show ATC can move more traffic more efficiently this way? The same brainiac also discovered that sewers function better if they flow down not up...and round wheels work better than square wheels. Gotta love technology!


User currently offlineSSTjumbo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 861 times:

WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH WOAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The new airport config just looked like a copy of DFW!!! Don't go nuts on me  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!


User currently offlineSSTjumbo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 858 times:

BTW, I am saying that a greater volume will take off and land over 294

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
ORD To Be Expanded! (Again...) posted Thu May 4 2000 06:49:30 by 747-600X
CX Traffic To ATL, DFW And ORD posted Wed Aug 30 2006 01:34:54 by Bkkair
DFW To Be Affected By Major Road Reconstruction? posted Sat Feb 25 2006 19:35:17 by OPNLguy
DL To Fly LGA-ORD And LGA-DFW With E170 posted Mon Jan 23 2006 18:22:02 by FlyPNS1
DFW - What Is Used To Be posted Tue Mar 2 2004 03:31:23 by DodgeCharger
Wouldn't it make more sense for BA to fly DFW - ORD - LHR? posted Fri Feb 20 2004 04:38:07 by ORDnDFW777
CO To ATL, DFW, ORD At EWR? posted Fri Jul 4 2003 00:05:25 by Rolo987
ORD Slot Restrictions To Be Lifted? posted Tue May 9 2000 04:17:17 by Tom in NO
AA DC-10 Flying From ORD To Dfw? posted Mon Mar 27 2000 01:54:21 by American 767
Ex-UA 767's To Be Used To Start Gabon Airlines posted Tue Dec 19 2006 01:48:58 by WorldXplorer