Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
747 Natural Progression...  
User currently offlineJETPILOT From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3130 posts, RR: 27
Posted (16 years 1 month 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1001 times:

Wouldn't the natural progression for the increased capacity on the 747 be to just extend the upper deck instead of increasing legnth. Does anyone know why Boeing has foregone this option.

The stretch could only adversly affect ground handling.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineJack From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 116 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (16 years 1 month 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 875 times:

yes, definetly, like the A-3xx!!!
However, bigger aircraft are not needed at all anyway...

User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (16 years 1 month 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 870 times:

I've head something about problems with having the upper deck on the wing root frame.

User currently offlineHisham From Lebanon, joined Aug 1999, 701 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (16 years 1 month 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 850 times:

Deplaning the passengers from a longer aircraft is much easier than from a streched upper deck one. I heard something about security problems resulting from doubledeckers.

User currently offlineWilliam From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1514 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (16 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 830 times:

I remember reading about this in a Popular Mechanics back in the early 80s. Its an idea that has been kicked around for some time. Why they have not done it yet? Who knows,could be airframe problems. If Boeing is to extend the "the Old Lady",it should go ahead with its 747xx project. Using parts from the 777 and lengthening the fuselage. Heck,they might call it 747 NG.

User currently offlineL_188 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (16 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 818 times:

It is an idea that has been kicked around ever since the 747 just existed on paper. The proplem is that it would cost more to develop and to tool the factory then it would to just strech the airplane. Every frame aft of the current hump would have to be redesigned and that is where the increased cost comes into play.

User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2114 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (16 years 1 month 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 811 times:

In addition to the frames having to be all new, and they would all have to be new, as stretching the upper deck would affect the ones in the present hump too, as the present upper deck tapers off from the front to the back, the significant increase in weight would necessitate an all new wing, which is another big ticket item. They would end up with the cost of making a new airplane. The upper deck is quite small. It is only 6 seats abreast in economy, and even that is cramped. They could get the same extra seat capacity by stretching it, and that route would be more feasible.

An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineVirgin747 From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 327 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (16 years 1 month 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 792 times:

Just remember the 777300 is longer now!!!!!!!!!!
Which one would be forced to ask
"what is worlds largest commerical aircraft???"


User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (16 years 1 month 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 788 times:

It's interesting no one has mentioned the problems created by the oblong shape of the 747 forward fuselage. Older 747s have to undergo extensive overhaul and strengthening of the frames and stringers for that section because, as I read somewhere, "Mother Nature prefers curves rather than flat surfaces." Hence the structural failures which have occurred, albeit not often (UAL 747-200 out of Honolulu having part of the forward cabin wall disintegrate, for example). This leads me to wonder if the design of the 747 is not dated.

Regarding the 777-300, it is indeed the world's largest airliner by virtue of its length. The 747-400 exceeds it in passenger capacity.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is CDG The Only International 747 Route For ANA? posted Thu Aug 6 2009 16:37:33 by 777-500er
KLM 747 IFE Retrofit Status posted Thu Aug 6 2009 16:07:03 by Nantoine
Atlas Air 747-400F In POM Today 4 Aug 09 posted Mon Aug 3 2009 23:33:36 by HSVflier
Will We See 747-200s In New Delta Colours? posted Mon Aug 3 2009 13:31:30 by PillowTester
NW 747 Off The Runway In MSP - Blown Tires posted Sun Aug 2 2009 15:28:54 by Cbphoto
Asian Airlines From 747 To 773ER In JFK posted Sun Aug 2 2009 09:10:37 by JetBlue777
Attn PHL Spotters: AF 747-400 In Town posted Thu Jul 30 2009 19:46:32 by USflt1778
Last JL 747 Classic Flight Tomorrow posted Wed Jul 29 2009 02:10:09 by Trent1000
KE Replaces 747 With 773ER In JFK. posted Tue Jul 28 2009 14:39:30 by JetBlue777
NW 747-200 And 747-200 HD? posted Tue Jul 28 2009 05:29:29 by NWADC9