Internal struggle between UA and CO folks going on over pilot simulator training.
CO lobbied the FAA to accept cheaper, non moving simulators to save approximately one third of the price. No other major airline utilizes these cheaper units in the world.
Now they want the UA folks to go along with it, because CO believes this "innovative" solution is better (and saves a few dimes). It's not going along too well with the UA folks, who believe you need full motion simulators for safety's sake and tthe company should not be attempting to.shortchange pilot training to save small amounts of money.
It falls right into the new methodology of the new UA downgaging to save menial sums of money on things the old UA wouldn't have (eliminate domestic F pillows, doengrade to.cheaper blsnkets, charge for premium alcoholic mixers in F, downgage compensation for elites). Should be interesting to see which mentality wins out aat the combined company.
tozairport From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 682 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (3 years 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1422 times:
Fixed base sims have their use. They are excellent procedural trainers and really could be used to replicate a lot of real world scenarios.
Full motion sims are great if you are using the visual picture, as using visuals with no motion feels really awkward.
All that being said, full motion simulator fidelity will never come close to replicating the actual emergencies pilots face. There is no good way to produce the bone jarring bangs of a compressor stall, the actual smoke in the cockpit of an avionics fire, or the noise and debris associated with a rapid depressurization.
All in all, this is something for the combined airline to work out, and something that, as usual, the press got completely wrong. It was just another fluff story.
Mir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21425 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (3 years 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1402 times:
You want to use a fixed-base sim for procedures and CRM training, I'm all for it - no need for motion when you're doing that sort of stuff. But when it comes to certain emergencies - engine failures, windshear, terrain, etc., there's no substitute for motion.
Not to mention that fixed-based sims can really make you sick.
7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
IAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (3 years 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 989 times:
Quoting CODC10 (Reply 3): CO isn't using fixed-base sims exclusively. They still operate full-motion sims for all training procedures where they are essential. I should know, I've 'flown' them before !
Myself as well and they have two fairly new 738 sims with GLS.
IIRC, CO just took delivery of their 787 sim in Houston which was to be full motion, that certainly wasn't cheap.
Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.