Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Article- Southwest In Indianapolis (IND)  
User currently offlineLoneStarMike From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 3827 posts, RR: 33
Posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1185 times:

Interesting article from the Indianapolis Star.

http://www.indystar.com/print/articles/southwest11.html

Southwest flies high, increasing presence in air market here
 By Chris O'Malley
Indianapolis Star
July 11, 2001

 Southwest Airlines is adding more flights to Florida in another sign of the low-fare carrier's growing presence at Indianapolis International Airport.

Starting in October, Southwest will add another nonstop flight to Tampa and to Orlando. Both flights will continue to West Palm Beach.

Besides added frequency, Southwest has been carving out a bigger market share here. In the first four months of 2001, Southwest was the third-busiest carrier in Indianapolis, with 13.3 percent of total traffic.

That's up from early 2000, when it was the sixth-busiest carrier, with 9.1 percent of traffic.

Southwest is closing in on No. 2 American Trans Air, which has 14.9 percent of traffic, and No. 1 US Airways, with 15.1 percent of passengers.

The increasingly fragmented market share in Indianapolis amounts to more competition and, theoretically at least, lower fares.

In the early 1990s, US Airways was by far the dominant airline in Indianapolis, with about 41 percent of traffic.

Cities dominated by one carrier tend not to sport the best fares.

Indianapolis' average fare is $166. In Pittsburgh, which is dominated by US Airways, the average fare is $210, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation.

It's even worse at US Airways' hub at Charlotte, N.C., at $248. In Cincinnati, which is dominated by Delta Airlines, the average fare was $244 in the fourth quarter of 2000.

"It gives us that mix of carriers so that we don't have to live in fear of one carrier yanking our chain all the time,' said Dennis Rosebrough, spokesman for BAA Indianapolis, which manages Indianapolis International.

That it is low-fare Southwest leapfrogging in market share can't hurt, either. "They have a great effect on keeping air fares low,' said Donna Winter, manager of Allen Travel in Carmel.

"Southwest moving up (in rank) is a big deal,' said Patrick Dooley, vice president of business development at BAA Indianapolis.

Dooley said other carriers have adjusted prices to match Southwest to destinations such as Baltimore. Since Southwest added nonstop service to Baltimore, traffic among all carriers serving that market from Indianapolis rose 45percent between the third quarter of 1999 and the same period in 2000, according to BAA.

Southwest, with 21 daily departures at Indianapolis, also has more nonstop destinations -- to 11 cities. That's about twice as many as each of its biggest competitors here, who instead feed many of their flights through a main hub.

Southwest does not, however, cater to business travelers who demand first-class seating.

Its presence here also brings no relief for those who fly to cities where there is little competition and thus higher fares from Indianapolis.

"If you want to go to Atlanta from Indianapolis, your first step is to call your banker for a loan. That hasn't changed,' said Michael Boyd, president of The Boyd Group, a Colorado aviation consulting company.

"Our weakness is we're not a hub. Our strength is we're not a hub, because it gives us diverse market share,' said John J. Dillon, director of Mayor Bart Peterson's task force to improve non-stop air service.

Dillon's team has been bombarding airlines with data that show there is demand for more flights to such cities as Hartford, Conn.; Seattle; and San Diego. City officials intent on turning Indianapolis into a high-tech hotbed also have been trying to get nonstop service to Austin, Texas. END OF STORY

I wonder if Southwest, after adding the new flights to Florida, will ease past US Airways to having the number 1 market share.

I noticed the article stated that Southwest had 21 daily flights, so I assume the 2 new Florida flights will push that up to 23. Southwest's website states "Southwest Airlines uses gates A1, A2, and A3 on the A concourse." for IND, so it looks like they could add 7 or 8 more flights, but then they would need more gates.

I was surprised by that last bit in the article that stated the folks in IND were looking to get a non-stop flight to AUS. I don't see a market between the two cities, but maybe they could do a IND-AUS-SAN, since SAN is also on IND's "wish list", much like they do the SAN-AUS-RDU flights now. I don't know what the loads are like on the SAN-AUS-RDU flights, but Southwest just added a second flight in each direction in April, I believe, so it must be doing well.

Maybe I'm wrong, but it also seems like these kinds of routings help Southwest in the on-time departmnet. I noticed last year, when I was flying home from OAK, the last leg of my trip was on a Southwest flight LAX-AUS-TPA. The LAX-AUS segment was full and when we got to AUS, where I got off, about 60-65 other passengers deplaned and it looked like there were about that many in the gate area waiting to board the continuation of the flight to TPA.

I guess my point is that the turn at AUS seemed to go really quick (I watched) because they only had to unload and reload half the plane. For the intermediate cities (like AUS) it's great because we get 737 service to places that might otherwise only have enough traffic to warrant service using regional jets.

OK...enough rambling.  Smile

LoneStarMike

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1158 times:

Well, now that Southwest has added SAT as a destination from SAN, it looks this new flight will take the place of the morning departure to AUS, taking its time, flight number, and everything. Southwest made a point of mentioning that this new flight will be continuing on to RDU when they announced it a few days ago, so it seems like there is something happening in this market. I don't think a nonstop flight to RDU from SAN is too far away, although Southwest could be a bit antsy about starting it as it would be their first true coast-to-coast route and some people would inevitably complain about the Southwest's service standards on a flight as long as this one would be.

I for one thought that SAN-AUS would be kept twice daily, as both of the cities are high-tech centers. Pretty much every new route that WN has started from SAN in recent years has already gone twice daily with the exception of MSY (Nashville and Kansas City being the other two besides Austin), and I am surprised that WN has chose to downgrade its schedule to AUS after they just added a second flight. Perhaps there were gate and slot concerns at SAN.

I don't think IND-AUS-SAN would be a bad idea, because if the second AUS flight was canceled because of load problems, then the passengers from IND would help make the flight profitable. However, I don't think SAN-IND nonstop would be a bad idea, as they are two fairly large cities, and Southwest has a knack for making flights to new destinations from SAN work.

Aaron G.


User currently offlineTan flyr From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1909 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

As a former resident of the "circle city"/"Nap town" I can see why IND would want alternative nonstop to ATL. IND would be a perfect fit for Air Tran in my opinion.

The market shares were interesting also. I wonder what TWA's was back in the days of nonstops to MCI/STL/JFK/PIT/DCA & LGA(?). Anybody in Indy have that info?


User currently offlineLsjef From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1126 times:

Thanks for posting the article.

This is a good example of how well SWA works. Quietly grow at a secondary airport, slowly passing the majors, while bringing smiles to city leaders with expanded, affordable air travel (and the associated economic connections). As for on-times, these airports are far less prone to massive delays compared to the over-rated and over-built hub airports. And look at SWA's efficiency: they average maybe 8+ turns per gate per day, compared with 2-3 turns at UAL/DAL gates at PDX...another great way to keep costs down.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Southwest In PIT - Typo In Article? posted Fri Jun 25 2004 15:37:50 by JohnJ
Article About Southwest In Tampa Tribune posted Wed Sep 25 2002 23:13:19 by LoneStarMike
Southwest In Wichita ICT posted Thu Dec 21 2006 20:10:25 by Lightsaber
SkyValue Takes On Southwest In The Chicago Area posted Mon Nov 27 2006 09:19:02 by QXatFAT
Connecting On Southwest In Orlando Question posted Sun Sep 24 2006 05:43:21 by Iowaman
Why No Southwest In MSP? posted Tue May 9 2006 07:10:36 by NW757MSP
Southwest In PIT - One Year Later posted Wed Apr 12 2006 05:38:09 by N670UW
Southwest In Canada? posted Fri Feb 10 2006 00:22:08 by Fiedman
Article About A380 And IND posted Sun Jan 15 2006 14:53:44 by IndyCanuck
I Love Southwest IN DEN! posted Fri Jan 6 2006 02:24:18 by Adam1115