fiscal From Australia, joined Oct 2009, 338 posts, RR: 0 Posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1443 times:
I am led to believe that all flights into and out of the EU after 1st January 2012, will now attract ANOTHER government fee for a EU Emissions Trading Scheme. With the "science" of global warming and co2 emissions having been shown to be totally discredited, this appears to be yet another tax for a tax sake.
It used to be a marketing ploy by airlines to make themselves appeal to the "greenies", allowing them to pay for carbon offsets if they so pleased. Now it seems it is compulsory.
DeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 8405 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1422 times:
There was a thread in non-av about this. As much as I disagree with the tax... it is their territory, and they are not taxing unfairly (all nations the same), but yeah, put on your flame suits it's gonna be a bumpy ride!
As to the ETS, it's about time aviation was taxed fairly like any other mode of transport. As for every mode of transport, the best ways to do it is either to tax according to the congestion caused, or the pollution emitted.
Europe is in its right to levy whatever it feels like, and international airlines will have to deal with it!
HAL From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 2588 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1395 times:
Quoting fiscal (Thread starter): With the "science" of global warming and co2 emissions having been shown to be totally discredited,
I'm sure this is going straight to non-Av, but you are wrong about that. Only those with vested interest in fossil fuel production (and money to lose if it goes away) support the meager data against global warming. On the other hand, the piles (mountains, reams, vaults) of data supporting global warming is simply too scary for some to pay attention too. It's the old 'head in the sand' routine. If a few people repeat the anti-warming message loudly enough and often enough, then those who don't really dig into the subject (most of the general population) will begin to believe them, since the people who have studied and researched global warming are smart, quiet, dilligent, and not really good at rousing the troops to their side.
One smooth landing is skill. Two in a row is luck. Three in a row and someone is lying.
FlyASAGuy2005 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 7106 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (3 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1276 times:
Quoting fiscal (Reply 5): I was quoted 26USD for the return trip to the UK.
On top of what's already charged to fly out of the UK. They lost my business to MAD for the crazy fees that arecharged upon departure, and thus tacked onto a ticket. I'm small potatoes, yes but just saying.