TLHFLA From United States of America, joined May 2003, 593 posts, RR: 1 Posted (3 years 1 month 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 11407 times:
I noticed Delta has cut ATL-LGW to 6 times per week (not operating on Saturday) effective 10/1, and then 5 times per week (not operating on Friday and Sunday) from November on. As far as I can remember, this flight has always been daily. ATL-LHR appears to be remaining at the same level of service. Could this be the beginning of the end of DL service to LGW? Since they only fly there from ATL and soon not to be daily, it seems they decide to not leave that station open.
I flew ATL-LHR and back last April and the flights were extremely full. Both of the return flights were overbooked and they were asking for volunteers for $1,000 credits to give up seats. I assumed the ATL-LGW flight performed well as they have kept the LGW station open for just that one flight.
gilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 3023 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (3 years 1 month 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 10567 times:
Even though the flight is full, I have noticed the flight DL flight LGW-ALT is very regularly full of British tourists usually on package holidays to the US and connecting through ATL or Americans heading to London.
This would make me think a number of seats are being sold cheap in bulk to tour operators. So may not be all that profitable.
That only leaves US Airways as the only American airline flying daily out of LGW to CLT, they still continue to use an A330-300 on the route, which would make me think this is operating well. Considering they could if they chose, downgrade it to a A330-200 or a 767-200.
AV8AJET From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1348 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (3 years 1 month 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 10196 times:
Wow, I remember one year DL had up to 4 flights a day from ATL to LGW. IIRC wasn't this DL's very first transatlantic flight? I would Love to see some earlier flights from ATL to LHR, are there plans to aquire some more slots?
chopchop767 From Italy, joined Aug 2010, 226 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 1 month 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 9797 times:
Quoting skipness1E (Reply 4): That only leaves US Airways as the only American airline flying daily out of LGW to CLT, they still continue to use an A330-300 on the route, which would make me think this is operating well. Considering they could if they chose, downgrade it to a A330-200 or a 767-200.
skipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3254 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (3 years 1 month 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 9665 times:
American are now all at LHR, including RDU. Summer 2005 had ATL-LGW at least three daily, but am sure four. Need to check, this was the last year before they launched New York to London. All on the B763 they had ATL-LGW DL8,DL12 and DL58. CVG-LGW was DL36.
DFW36L From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 89 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (3 years 1 month 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 8334 times:
Do y'all remember when DL 12 continued from LGW to the FRA hub? I remember going to LGW to spend a summer abroad while in college and I sat next to a guy who was continuing to the FRA hub to connect to somewhere. But then those were the days when I flew home on DL's FRA-DFW flight! I also remember that a different summer, I flew DL 10 to go to my summer study abroad and my bags flew on DL 12.
See! I knew American Eagle was First Class all along!
BAViscount From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2338 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (3 years 1 month 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 8043 times:
Quoting skipness1E (Reply 11): You will also have seen A332 and A333 as well as the B764 but the current allocation is the B763 alas. Actually we also used to see TriStars and the odd A310 too!
Don't forget there was the MD11 too! The last time I flew LGW-ATL was with BA on a 777 and DL's MD11 was taxiing in front of us at LGW and landed parallel to us at ATL. I wished I was on that aircraft instead!
Ladies & gentlemen this is Captain Tobias Wilcock welcoming you aboard Coconut Airways flight 372 to Bridgetown Barb
burnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7545 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (3 years 1 month 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 7974 times:
Quoting TLHFLA (Reply 14): What's funny is those flight numbers still exist with DL 12 ATL-LGW and DL 10 ATL-LHR. They still sometimes even depart from the T gates when E is full.
A lot of international flights still depart from the T-Gates, the other night when I was there CPH, MAN, and a few others were all leaving out of the T-gates, all those aircraft are moved over from TechOps before the flight, which is why most of them depart out of the T-Gates since they were already in ATL for something and not flying that day.
"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
planeguy727 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1247 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (3 years 1 month 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5985 times:
Sorry - should have been more clear. When I worked there the T-gates were just international (before E was built). T-7 was LH, T-14 was BA, etc. Of course back then there were far fewer international flights.
RWA380 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3261 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (3 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5568 times:
My very first 777 flight ever was on a shiny brand new AA plane LGW-DFW, we went a bit out of our way to fly one of AA's first 777 planes and routes. I don't think they had introduced them to LHR yet. Seemed strange their 777's were flying out of LGW first. What a tremendously different experience it was vs the 762 we had flown into BRU the week before, both in J but worlds apart in experience. Now AA doesn't even land at LGW? Wow things sure do change.
AA AC AQ AS BD BN CO CS DL EA EZ HA HP KL KN MP MW NK NW OO OZ PA PS QX RC RH RW SA TG TW UA US VS WA WC WN
skipness1E From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 3254 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (3 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5559 times:
Quoting skipness1E (Reply 9): Summer 2005 had ATL-LGW at least three daily, but am sure four. Need to check, this was the last year before they launched New York to London. All on the B763 they had ATL-LGW DL8,DL12 and DL58. CVG-LGW was DL36.
Quoting myself here, but I found what I was looking for. Summer 2005 presence at Gatwick was five daily B767-300ERs through Gatwick, four ATL-LGW, one CVG-LGW.
DL8 / 9
DL12 / 11
DL58 / 59
DL10 / 19
DL36 / 37
Quoting N766UA (Reply 19): LGW is so much more convenient than LHR, I have no idea why anyone would want to fly to Heathrow if given the choice.
That rather depends on where you are headed as not all passengers are tourists heaindg into town and industry and the M4 corridor are much nearer Heathrow than Gatwick.
bobnwa From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 6471 posts, RR: 9
Reply 22, posted (3 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 5449 times:
Quoting N766UA (Reply 19): I'm glad DL has kept LGW where every other US carrier has dropped it. LGW is so much more convenient than LHR, I have no idea why anyone would want to fly to Heathrow if given the choice.
I agree, If one is traveling to Central London, then LGW is more convenient when using the Gatwick express
TLHFLA From United States of America, joined May 2003, 593 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (3 years 1 month 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4703 times:
Quoting heebeegb (Reply 23): Didn't DL have a short lived BOS-LGW 763 service before 9/11 ?
Yep...they did. They also had a JFK-LGW flight that lasted longer. If I recall correctly, I think the DL JFK-LGW flight was the only service into LGW from JFK at the time. The JFK-LGW flight was discontinued a year or so before DL started up the JFK-LHR flights.
Bill in ATL
: Not at all, JFK-LGW was simply moved to LHR, there was no break in service. DL also operated DTW-LGW for a time to which was sold to NWA if I recall.
: Probably the yields are the ones making DL suspiciously do cutbacks slowly...
: This was all part of the PanAm acquisition.......it started as CLE-LGW, then I believe it was changed to DTW-LGW and sold to NW.....or maybe sold to
: I always thought it was strange that when it was only AA & UA to LHR, AA also flew to LGW but UA did not. Did UA ever fly to LGW or was it always
: American's route authority from DFW and RDU was to LGW, the LHR operations were bought from TWA in 1991, including JFK, EWR, LAX, MIA, ORD amongst oth
: Bermuda 2 listed those US cities which could be served from LHR. The list did not include either Dallas or Raleigh. So if AA wished to serve LON from
: DL continued to operate JFK-LGW albeit with a 757 even after it started JFK-LHR. JFK-LGW was eventually dropped after one summer of concurrent operat
: Oh yes I forgot DL kept JFK-LGW for a time, CO also kept a LGW operation for the first summer but the numbers didn't add up. Are US keeping CLT at LGW
: AA does not fly to LGW at all. I believe that I have read somewhere that LGW is trying to re-brand its self as a tourist airport for London and would
: It looks like the only routes left from the US to LGW are: Delta: ATL-LGW US Airways: CLT-LGW British Airways: TPA-LGW and MCO-LGW Virgin Atlantic: LA
: I think this is due to CLT not being on the list of cities that are approved to have service to LHR. I think the same is true for TPA and MCO.
: Nope, Open Skies means they are free to move. The US Florida flights from BA are a good fit with the BA LGW leisure business model, they are not likel
: Any city in the US can receive service from LHR as a result of open skies. No 'list' as per Bermuda II exists anymore. TPA and MCO are still at LGW b
: I thought that VS ran a LGW-MCO route as well?
: Yes VS currently operates twice daily LGW-MCO.
: This is because Bermuda 2 not only specified the US cities that could be served from LHR but also the airlines that could fly between them. The uname
: Virgin moved all LON-EWR to LHR prior to 2005 when I moved to London, perhaps someone else can help with the exact date. As to US at LGW , the same co
: Not to quibble, but I believe that DL swapped its DTW-LGW authority for NW's BOS-LGW in around the 1995-1996 timeframe (I'm not quite sure but it was
: When you fly into LHR there are so many more connections to the rest of the world and I did not like having to take the tube to Victoria Station to t
: I had thought about using LGW when I went to London last Spring. It is actually a little bit closer to where my friend I was visting lives, but it se
: The original National Airlines was also allowed to fly to LHR, on their MIA-LHR route, which was awarded in 1970. After Pan Am acquired National, thi
: It is purely because they can't get the slots on terms they like. If US could move CLT-LON to LHR, they would be gone from LGW in a second. I suspect
: My memory is a little fuzzy, but that's what I thought, too. A straight sale, no swap involved.
: This is something I have always found strange: I have never really understood why the carriers seem to prefer LHR, with all it's slot constraint prob
: I am sure it has more to do with passenger preference than airline preference. If yields at LGW were close to LHR then they would serve LGW but they
: Do any of the ATL-LHR flights ever get upgauged because of not having enough capacity? Now that the 77Es have upgraded BizE cabins, I could see DL up
: CO operated this route from about 1984/85 through the EA bankruptcy and liquidation.
: I actually got to DH to DTW to cover our LGW flight in 1995. I think this was right before we sold it. It was an L1011-500.
: National Airlines flew into LHR under the original 1946 Bermuda Agreement. This imposed no restrictions on which airlines could operate between LHR a
: Thanks very much for the correction! (What happened to NW's BOS-LGW authority?)