Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lockheed Constellation Windows  
User currently offlinePacificF27 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 69 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 5106 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The first few windows on the Connie are lower than the rest. Does the floor step down toward the front of the passenger cabin? Is the floor sloped? If neither of these what is the reason for the differing window heights?


EVA is tops across the Pacific!
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8965 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 5019 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rainer Spoddig



As you can see in this picture, there does indeed appear to be a step down towards the cockpit.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5158 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4924 times:

Both the shorter versions L049/649/749 and the longer versions L1049/1649 had the step down from the middle cabin to the forward cabin. Normally though, in airline operation of the time it was not all that noticeable as usually washrooms were placed there, or that was the transition from the passenger cabin, to the crew rest area.

The step down would have occurred going from one cabin to the next.

Looking at this picture, it is very obvious on this L049, as in a charter configuration no space would be left unsold:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ellis M. Chernoff



Or in this Save-A-Connie L1049H, you can see the step down as well.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ryan J. Pearl




Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26005 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4576 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 2):
Both the shorter versions L049/649/749 and the longer versions L1049/1649 had the step down from the middle cabin to the forward cabin. Normally though, in airline operation of the time it was not all that noticeable as usually washrooms were placed there, or that was the transition from the passenger cabin, to the crew rest area.

I believe that's true for the L-049/649/749 but not for the L-1049/1649 which had a flat floor and only the windows were positioned lower in the forward cabin. I've seen photos of a stripped L-1049 or 1649 cabin which showed the flat floor. Can't find the best photo now but did find this item. Nolte the caption of the 2nd photo.
http://www3.delta.edu/rmmee/insupcon.htm


User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5158 posts, RR: 43
Reply 4, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4565 times:

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 3):
but not for the L-1049/1649 which had a flat floor and only the windows were positioned lower in the forward cabin

That's what I always thought. And recall the TCA L1049 that was parked near YYZ open for viewing, I don't remember a step in the floor .... however, look at the interior shot of the SAC L1049H above, that clearly shows a drop in the floor level.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26005 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 4551 times:

Quoting longhauler (Reply 4):
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 3):
but not for the L-1049/1649 which had a flat floor and only the windows were positioned lower in the forward cabin

That's what I always thought. And recall the TCA L1049 that was parked near YYZ open for viewing, I don't remember a step in the floor .... however, look at the interior shot of the SAC L1049H above, that clearly shows a drop in the floor level.

Maybe it's my eyes, but I don't see a step in the 1049H photo.


User currently onlinevc10 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 1412 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4451 times:

I can confirm that the 749 had a stepdown . Now with the 1049 I think what happened is that originally as a passenger aircraft it might still have had a step down as the window line definately lowers at the front, but having never seen an original passenger 1049 this is a guess.

Now when the 1049 was converted to cargo with a cargo door at the front [unlike at the rear for the 749] the step on the 1049 would have been a real problem to loading freight, so I suggest as part of the conversion the front floor was contoured to overcome the step and so make the level floor we see on 1049 today which I would say are all preserved cargo aircraft .

to support this theory if I remember correctly the floor hatch to the front freight compartment on cargo 1049 has a floor hatch and beneath that another which is the original entry hatch.

Just a theory see if you think itis ok


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26005 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4402 times:

Quoting vc10 (Reply 6):
Now with the 1049 I think what happened is that originally as a passenger aircraft it might still have had a step down as the window line definately lowers at the front, but having never seen an original passenger 1049 this is a guess.

Photo of forward cabin of a preserved LH L-1049G (D-ALIN), still with original passenger interior. There's no step.
http://209.85.120.99/viewphoto.php?id=6488985&nseq=12


User currently onlinevc10 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2001, 1412 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 4325 times:

Viscount,
A lovely picture but was this aircraft preserved from it's end as a passenger aircarft in this condition or when it' passenger days were over was it converted to a cargo aircraft and then subsequently restored to a display passenger aircraft but still with a cargo floor
I have just looked up "Seaboard and Western " 1049 manual which shows the aircraft having a flat floor but as these aircraft were for both cargo and passengers and had a front cargo door it does not really settle the arguements
any other ideas


User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 26005 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4263 times:

Quoting vc10 (Reply 8):
Viscount,
A lovely picture but was this aircraft preserved from it's end as a passenger aircarft in this condition or when it' passenger days were over was it converted to a cargo aircraft and then subsequently restored to a display passenger aircraft but still with a cargo floor

As far as I can tell it was never converted to a freighter.


User currently offlinetimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6902 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (3 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2501 times:

The floor sloped on the 1649, so presumably on the 1049 as well. See the last paragraph of the first column of

http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1956/1956%20-%200911.html


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lockheed Constellation Turbo Prop? posted Sun Jun 4 2006 05:26:24 by Zippyjet
YYZ Lockheed Constellation On The Move posted Mon Jan 23 2006 19:41:42 by AIRCANL1011
Lockheed Constellation posted Tue Jan 17 2006 18:23:18 by Contrails
Lockheed Constellation Image-What Event? posted Thu Mar 13 2003 03:28:20 by Mirrodie
Lockheed Constellation At ISP Today! posted Mon Oct 7 2002 00:55:14 by Dragon-wings
Lockheed Constellation Info posted Tue Jul 31 2001 05:17:56 by Rkmcswain
Lockheed Constellation/Starliner Question. posted Mon Mar 5 2001 06:40:28 by Trintocan
Lockheed Constellation posted Mon Jan 3 2000 02:54:50 by Starship
Lockheed Super Constellation Atlantic Routes posted Wed Jul 7 2004 22:09:21 by Luisinho
Lockheed 1649A Constellation posted Tue Aug 1 2000 04:42:45 by Pjk1649a