Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CO/UA 764 Flatbed Installation....  
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4017 times:

I just had a look and it seems the first 764 (AC#60) for CO/UA is scheduled to be the first aircraft for the "new" flatbeds! Looks like she is due to be started on the 13th of October in HKG. I think the 777s took about a month to be completed so with 15 fewer seats, I would think the 764 might be a little quicker but with adding AVOD to the enitre aircraft, things might take a little longer. We'll see!

Danny

[Edited 2011-09-14 10:43:04]


Bring back Bethune!
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinekfitz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4000 times:

great info, fiveholer!

Should be interesting to see how the middle seat in the 2-1-2 layout looks!


User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3981 times:

Has anyone ever thought that maybe they might go 1-2-1? That way, everyone gets an aisle seat!


Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineULMFlyer From Brazil, joined Sep 2006, 475 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3891 times:

I was eagerly awaiting this, since I fly these 764s on the IAH-GIG route frequently.

But then I had my first experience with a flatbed on a 752 to Europe and ended up with mixed feelings. The AVOD is great, but the seats are a lot narrower, which is not an issue for me, but I can see being one for some heavier pax. However, I felt they weren't long enough to accommodate my 6'4" frame, which resulted in sleeping with bent knees that kept hitting the seat's frame.

I don't know, maybe I just need to get used to them and avoid row 1 on the 752, which seemed to have slightly less pitch than row 2.



Let's go Pens!
User currently offlinekfitz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3828 times:

I believe they confirmed 2-1-2, no?

On a sidenotd, the 763/764 (3-cabin and 2-cabin) will probably be the most comfortable intl. equipment in the fleet. On the 3 cabin IPTE 763s, you have what is arguably the most private F cabin fleet wide in 1-1-1. 1k and 2K offer almost total isolation (due to the high walls from 1/2B), and 2-2-2 in C is far better than 2-4-2 on the 777/744, and Y 2-3-2 remains fabulous. The 2 cabin equipment should be even better in Y with AVOD. I do wonder if they will seitch out the old bins on the remaining ghetto 763 and 764, and if so, would it extend to the Y cabin (as it doesn't on the 3-cabin 763. )


User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3800 times:

So are we 100% sure that there will be no 764s getting 3 classes?

It seems like a real lay-up to put 3 class on the 764 and operate it to Europe, and free up some 777s.

NS


User currently offlineSulley From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 524 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3788 times:



Quoting kfitz (Reply 4):
I believe they confirmed 2-1-2, no?

They did confirm this, yes.

Quote:
On a sidenotd, the 763/764 (3-cabin and 2-cabin) will probably be the most comfortable intl. equipment in the fleet. On the 3 cabin IPTE 763s, you have what is arguably the most private F cabin fleet wide in 1-1-1. 1k and 2K offer almost total isolation (due to the high walls from 1/2B), and 2-2-2 in C is far better than 2-4-2 on the 777/744, and Y 2-3-2 remains fabulous. The 2 cabin equipment should be even better in Y with AVOD. I do wonder if they will seitch out the old bins on the remaining ghetto 763 and 764, and if so, would it extend to the Y cabin (as it doesn't on the 3-cabin 763. )


Agreed about the comfort. The 764s all have the new style bins (they are some of the newest 767s off the line), but I have heard that the bins in PMUA aircraft will be upgraded in all cabins for a more consistent product experience. I never undertsood why it wasn't done in the first place.

[Edited 2011-09-14 11:41:55]


In thrust we trust!
User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 7, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3775 times:

I never can either. Also, why the Y class seats didn't get AVOD.

When they redo the bins in the PMUA 763s, do you think that might get an upgrade too?

NS


User currently offlinesldispatcher From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3702 times:

It would only be an assumption, but I suppose E+ will be done at the same time? Seems like that would be the most efficient thing to do.

User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3687 times:

Quoting Sulley (Reply 6):
Quoting kfitz (Reply 4):
I believe they confirmed 2-1-2, no?

They did confirm this, yes.

Yeah, forgot about that.



Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2618 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3679 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 5):
So are we 100% sure that there will be no 764s getting 3 classes?

It seems like a real lay-up to put 3 class on the 764 and operate it to Europe, and free up some 777s.

It may be more the layout of the aircraft that precludes F service. If F is added, Business would have to either lose seats or go past door number 2.
Additionally, the 1-1-1 configuration of F in the 767 wastes more space than in a 777 or 747.

Quoting Fiveholer (Reply 2):
Has anyone ever thought that maybe they might go 1-2-1? That way, everyone gets an aisle seat!

That would mean only 4 vs. 5 across. But, it brings up a thought. If the 764 had 1-2-2 seating vs. 2-1-2 it would mean only one person would not have aisle access vs. two. Then it could be advertised as two window seats and four aisle seats (as one seat would be both a window and aisle seat).

Of course, there are bulkheads and other issues that may make 1-2-2 not feasible.

[Edited 2011-09-14 12:25:52]

User currently offlinewashingtonian From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3604 times:

Quoting kfitz (Reply 4):
I do wonder if they will seitch out the old bins on the remaining ghetto 763 and 764, and if so, would it extend to the Y cabin (as it doesn't on the 3-cabin 763. )
Quoting Sulley (Reply 6):
but I have heard that the bins in PMUA aircraft will be upgraded in all cabins for a more consistent product experience.

On the 14 PMUA 763s about to be converted, or the other 21 PMUA 763s that already have the new IPTE? Those 21 birds need the new bins and AVOD in the back, and then United will have a very consistent product--all international aircraft will have lie-flat seats up front, and AVOD throughout. Plus Channel 9 and Y+, and that's one heck of a product offering!


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16859 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3109 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 5):
So are we 100% sure that there will be no 764s getting 3 classes?

They announced that 12 764s are going to be getting the new Businessfirst seats plus AVOD, 4 764s will remain in their "Pacific" configuration and operate IAH-HNL, DEN-HNL and SFO-HNL.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineCODC10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2406 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2905 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 12):
4 764s will remain in their "Pacific" configuration and operate IAH-HNL, DEN-HNL and SFO-HNL.

EWR-HNL is expected to remain 76H for the time being. This will allow for a pretty comfortable 4-airplane rotation.


User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21511 posts, RR: 60
Reply 14, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2783 times:

Quoting ULMFlyer (Reply 3):
But then I had my first experience with a flatbed on a 752 to Europe and ended up with mixed feelings. The AVOD is great, but the seats are a lot narrower, which is not an issue for me, but I can see being one for some heavier pax. However, I felt they weren't long enough to accommodate my 6'4" frame, which resulted in sleeping with bent knees that kept hitting the seat's frame.

CO's 752 cradle seat was very comfortable. Not a lot of adjustment but just the right shape when fully reclined. Sleeping in a recliner is not hard if it tilts the seat. I know the push is for all flat beds in J, but a PROPER cradle (not just a seat bottom that remains level while the back and legrest move) is more comfortable than many of these new flatbed products that are being creative with space at the expense of width, room for mens' feet, seat firmness, etc.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineCODC10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2406 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2625 times:

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 14):

CO's 752 cradle seat was very comfortable.

For the life of me I can't ever remember a 757 BF seat that tilted up to a cradle. The seat pan always remained level, to the best of my recollection. The 2nd generation 777 BF seats (2002-2010) did in fact cradle, though.


User currently offlineikramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21511 posts, RR: 60
Reply 16, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2522 times:

Quoting CODC10 (Reply 15):
For the life of me I can't ever remember a 757 BF seat that tilted up to a cradle. The seat pan always remained level, to the best of my recollection. The 2nd generation 777 BF seats (2002-2010) did in fact cradle, though.

It absolutely did. Not a great deal, but enough that it prevented slide down. It was also a softer seat that you sunk into a little bit. The 767 did not have these characteristics. Worst seat by far. The 777 didn't either but reclined more and was better than the 767.

When flying TATL I would avoid the 767 at all costs, trying to find a route with a 757 or 777.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineULMFlyer From Brazil, joined Sep 2006, 475 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2436 times:

Quoting ikramerica (Reply 16):
It absolutely did. Not a great deal, but enough that it prevented slide down.

Interesting. I only flew once on a 752 with the previous BF seats, on an EWR-MAD trip, and I cannot remember this feature. But I can totally see how what you described would make it much more comfortable than the current 764 seats.

Another issue with the new flatbeds (and something that the F/As warned us about on our EWR-LIS leg, but not inbound) is that if you put something like a cell phone or a passport on the tray in front of you and they fly under your seat during takeoff, it's a pain to retrieve it. Your best bet is waiting for the item to show up, when the plane brakes on arrival.



Let's go Pens!
User currently onlineaklrno From United States of America, joined Dec 2010, 934 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2381 times:

Quoting ULMFlyer (Reply 17):
Another issue with the new flatbeds (and something that the F/As warned us about on our EWR-LIS leg, but not inbound) is that if you put something like a cell phone or a passport on the tray in front of you and they fly under your seat during takeoff, it's a pain to retrieve it. Your best bet is waiting for the item to show up, when the plane brakes on arrival.

You fly on an airline where you aren't told to stow everything and put up the table before take-off? That's one of the reasons for that rule.


User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2618 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2317 times:

Quoting CODC10 (Reply 13):
Quoting STT757 (Reply 12):
4 764s will remain in their "Pacific" configuration and operate IAH-HNL, DEN-HNL and SFO-HNL.

EWR-HNL is expected to remain 76H for the time being. This will allow for a pretty comfortable 4-airplane rotation.

Not sure if it's too comfortable with all flights daily, but it's a heck of a rotation with several swapout opportunities at HNL. My guess is this could be permanent even though the CO 764 has only 12 more total seats than the UA 763H. If Y+ is added, the difference would be only 5 total seats.

All four 764s are in HNL every evening with one laying over from as early as 1410 to 0745. Average utilization on the fleet is 14.7 hours per day per aircraft. All maintenance is done in HNL.
Here's the rotation.
HNL 0745 SFO 1452-1630 HNL 2002-2300 DEN 0849
DEN 1200 HNL 1632-1925 EWR 1000
EWR 1135 HNL 1540-1910 IAH 0645
IAH 0935 HNL 1410


User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 20, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2288 times:

With such a small difference in seats, why couldn't they do better on the CO 764s? Is it spacing in the BizFirst cabin?

Don't get me wrong - I think such a long flight deserves a better seat up front and more overall comfort in the cabin, and I wouldn't want them to change a thing about that. But could they lay the cabin out better?

NS


User currently offlineCALPSAFltSkeds From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 2618 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2239 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 20):
With such a small difference in seats, why couldn't they do better on the CO 764s? Is it spacing in the BizFirst cabin?

Don't get me wrong - I think such a long flight deserves a better seat up front and more overall comfort in the cabin, and I wouldn't want them to change a thing about that. But could they lay the cabin out better?

NS

The 764 has just 4 rows of 5 across BF with 55 inch pitch - total 20 seats. Compare that with the 34 seats on UA763ER (6 across at 38 inch pitch). The 764 would have to be a better ride up front, but has only 20 vs. 34 seats. I guess that means fewer upgrades.

With the ability to upgrade people to 56 Y+ seats, the UA 763H might be way too many seats (90 F plus Y+) to try to sell or have for upgrades on the low yield route. Of course, it looks like this UA 763 config is going away in favor of a two class International config.

On the other hand, the 764 right now doesn't have Y+. Looking at the seat map, the 5 rows of 32 inch pitch Y in front of Door 2 would go to over 38 inches with a row pulled. Maybe that doesn't change and Y+ goes behind Door 2, where 7 rows at 36 could replace 8 rows at 32 inch pitch.

Based on the seating arrangement and the 764Hs looking like they will be locked into HNL flying, I would not be surprised if these aircraft remain in present config until they are potentially reconfigured into true international configuration somewhere down the road like the other 12 764s. If they get lie flats, another option would be 25BF and three rows of Y+ in front of Door 2.


User currently offlinegigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 22, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2147 times:

I'm just having a hard time understanding why they are so close to each other in seating when a 764 SHOULD be much larger.

Why would anyone buy a 764?

NS


User currently offlineCODC10 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2406 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (2 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1916 times:

Quoting gigneil (Reply 22):



I'm just having a hard time understanding why they are so close to each other in seating when a 764 SHOULD be much larger.

Why would anyone buy a 764?

NS

The CO 76H is still internationally-configured. In a similar configuration to UA's 767-300ER domestic ships, the 764 would seat about 270. The F cabin on the UA 'ghetto birds' is not very pleasant.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO/UA Receives Approval For IAH-Lagos posted Tue Nov 30 2010 16:22:56 by STT757
OAG Changes 12/3/2010:CO/UA/DL/F9/FL/NK/WS posted Tue Nov 30 2010 07:28:06 by enilria
OAG Changes 11/19/2010:AS?/B6/CO/UA/DL/FL/LI posted Tue Nov 16 2010 12:42:22 by enilria
CO/UA At MFE/HRL/BRO posted Wed Nov 10 2010 22:47:36 by mfe777
OAG Changes 11/12/2010:AA/AS/CO/UA/DL/FL/G4/NK/US posted Wed Nov 10 2010 06:45:03 by enilria
OAG Changes 11/5/2010:AA/CO/UA/DL/NK/WN/ZK posted Wed Nov 3 2010 17:01:53 by enilria
OAG Changes 10/29/2010:AA/AC/AM/CO/UA/DL/FL/US/WN posted Tue Oct 26 2010 12:32:10 by enilria
CO/UA More Flights To Mexico posted Tue Oct 12 2010 13:57:11 by netjetsintl
CO UA Aircraft Fleet Number Integration posted Sun Oct 10 2010 16:20:29 by CALPSAFltSkeds
United Livery List - From CO & UA posted Thu Oct 7 2010 23:03:30 by qfatwa