Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Anyone Think As AA Disposes M80's G4 May Want Em?  
User currently offlineRWA380 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4603 posts, RR: 6
Posted (4 years 8 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3892 times:

Just as the title says, as G4 constantly expands they would possibly want to add to their M80 fleet? I'm sure they would sell for a song. Or will those AA frames have too many cycles and in too bad of shape even for G4's needs. I'm sure some of the newer M80's will be the last retired. Doesn't G4 have a myriad of different variants flying currently?

Next Flights: PDX-HNL-OGG-LIH-PDX On AS, WP & HA
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMEA-707 From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4578 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (4 years 8 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 3873 times:

Allegiant have a lot of ex SAS MD-80s in stock already, some are parked and can either return in service or become beercans in the next few years. These SAS aircraft have fewer hours then the American birds which are being parked now and often had recent C-checks already. They seem to stabilize their fleet, it's around 45 active MD-80s for a while now. Maybe 5 to 10 more SAS birds will become active at the most.
They probably concentrate on making the 757 work and then look at replacements for the MD-80s instead, probably around 2017 a lot of cheap 738s start to become available. So all in all, I don't see them buying any AA aircraft.

nobody has ever died from hard work, but why take the risk?
User currently offlineaerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 8299 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (4 years 8 months 3 days ago) and read 3756 times:

most will be scrapped/ some converted to freighters with a few stragglers going to South America, Africa and maybe russia/CIS in the hands of 3rd tier airlines trying to get a lot of plane for not much cash....

A few will go into service with corporations, sports teams and private ownership as VIP/Low density aircraft.

User currently offlineokie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3807 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (4 years 8 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 3675 times:

Quoting RWA380 (Thread starter):
Or will those AA frames have too many cycles and in too bad of shape even for G4's needs

AA will be replacing enough airframes over the next few years that there will just be a glut of the frames in the used market driving the used airframe prices to near scrap value. AA did not fall off the turnip truck yesterday and will be retiring the airframes when they bump up against major checks, therefore, getting their last nickel of value from the aircraft. I am afraid that the used market for the MD80 will be quite depressed when the airframes would face a major check before use.


User currently offlinecontrails From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 1845 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 8 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3225 times:

I flew AA's MadDogs hundreds of times, if not thousands. I guess my first response would be that G4 can have the MadDogs, although I don't know why they'd want them. But before I get flamed, I will just state that imo these birds have done their duty and should be retired with whatever dignity can be afforded them.

These birds are part of another age, an age when flying was enjoyable and pax didn't have to reveal any anatomical secrets to government agents. I hope at least a few of these birds wind up in aviation museums. They did, after all, open the world of travel to millions of people.

Flying Colors Forever!
User currently offlineGymClassHero From United States of America, joined Jun 2007, 70 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (4 years 8 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2994 times:

I doubt it. They've been run into the ground. There are better MD-80s out there for them if they need anymore.

Though AA did receive some well into the 90s, so some younger MD-80s are among their fleet. There may be a future for them, maybe not with G4, but I doubt they will be relegated to the scrap heap as fast as their older brethren, especially now that there are engine fittings that can up their engine efficiency by ~20% IIRC.

With airframes as cheap as they are, and the engine fittings, I have a feeling that the MD-80 will become a flagship for many a 2nd/3rd-tier or startup airline in the future. Not sure how much cargo life they have, as the fuselage really doesn't fit any major pallets like the 727/757/widebody frames do.

In other words - Oldies, done. Younger models, they'll probably end up somewhere else.

[Edited 2011-09-26 21:55:25]

[Edited 2011-09-26 21:59:00]

User currently offlinerbgso From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 640 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 8 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2753 times:

I suspect they may pick up a few, if the price is right, for parts if nothing else.

User currently offlinelonghauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 6054 posts, RR: 43
Reply 7, posted (4 years 8 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2622 times:

I think AAs MD-80s will be well maintained, and a "catch". However I recall a quote from (I think) Bob Crandall, about the retirement of the B727s.

He said something along the lines of : "Next time we retire a large fleet of similar types, we will just scrap them and make sure they never fly again. It is getting annoying to have to compete against your own old aircraft, flown by anyone with a few dollars together."

This may well apply here.

Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
User currently offline727LOVER From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 7451 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (4 years 8 months 21 hours ago) and read 2297 times:

Does G4 still fly MD-87s? If so, how many?

I feel woozy....what did you put in that Pudding Pop?
User currently offlinemcg From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 967 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (4 years 8 months 20 hours ago) and read 2235 times:

Are the rules with regard to maintenance checks enforced in places like Africa?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
OAG Changes 4/23/2010:AS/B6/CO/DL/G4/WN posted Tue Apr 20 2010 09:49:05 by enilria
Anyone Think Air Southwest & Flybe Should Merge? posted Mon Mar 9 2009 09:38:08 by 8herveg
Can Anyone Think Of A Two-jet Top-winged Plane? posted Thu Oct 2 2008 12:12:04 by Triebwerk
Anyone Think Gatwick Needs A Terminal Re-shift? posted Mon May 19 2008 08:05:40 by 8herveg
Anyone Think WN Will Enter MSP posted Mon Apr 14 2008 19:14:45 by SpencerII
AA GSO M80 Dropped posted Fri Oct 12 2007 15:00:18 by Davidlc3
Anyone Think Durham Tees Is A Stupid Name? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 01:17:15 by 8herveg
Anyone Know How AA-ORD-NRT/NGO Routes Are Doing? posted Sat Aug 13 2005 04:16:06 by Jacobin777
WN Just As Guilty As AA, DFW posted Sat Jul 16 2005 06:39:01 by SonOfACaptain
Does Anyone Think The USAir/AWA Deal Will Happen? posted Wed May 18 2005 16:31:52 by Quickmover