Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thomson A320 In Trouble Over UK?  
User currently offlinejumpjet From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 293 posts, RR: 0
Posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9496 times:

I've just been watching a First Choice/Thomson A320 circling over East Devon, UK, for the last hour or so and it's started heading north at 10,000 feet. Having looked on-line it seems that it was the flight from Manchester, UK, to Gambia, West Africa. I watched it finally descend and it's just landed at Bristol.

Does anyone know what's happened? I presume it will be a technical problem rather than medical as it looked to me as if they were circling whilst deciding what to do or maybe dumping fuel. If it was medical, they'd get down as soon as possible wouldn't they?

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineblueshamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 3073 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9432 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

No, it's an inbound to Exeter, diverted to Bristol due Fog at Exeter.

EGTE 290750Z 06003KT 0150 FG FEW001 BKN005 13/13 Q1022=

http://www.flightradar24.com/#!/2011-09-29/01:40/TOM737

Rgds

[Edited 2011-09-29 01:26:31]


So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlineacelanzarote From Spain, joined Nov 2005, 857 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9420 times:

I presume that´s the plane that then works EXT-ACE on a Thursday morning.......


from the Island with sun and great photo's.. Why not visit Lanzarote
User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From UK - England, joined Mar 2001, 5964 posts, RR: 61
Reply 3, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9420 times:

Not necessarily - flight to Banjul (?) would put the A320 at MTOW or near as damnit. If there was a medical emergency or MX issue the crew cannot dump fuel and she wouldnt be at safe landing weight yet on reaching Bristol, so they either land overweight (which would put the frame out of action for a few weeks while they do surveys etc) they probably circled to burn off as much fuel as possible to get down to a safe landing weight - obviously if the medical problem was a stroke or a heart attack then they'd eat it and land immediately, (full emergency, inc fire services for a possible brake fire etc) but if the problem was something MX-related or a medical emergency not bad enough to divert immediately but bad enough to warrant the aircraft holding while they assess the patient, then they would circle to burn fuel to land at a safe weight so that once they've bussed a new crew in (am assuming they didnt have a spare crew on board to fly the return leg?) they can be on their way after filing new flight plan etc.


What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
User currently offlinejumpjet From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 293 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9394 times:

Thanks for that. I'm only 3 miles from Exeter airport and it all seems fine. On the Plane Finder app on my phone it said it was a flight from Manchester to The Gambia - obviously duff information. I'm glad that's all the problem was, fog.

Cheers


User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9119 posts, RR: 76
Reply 5, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9364 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 3):
(which would put the frame out of action for a few weeks while they do surveys etc)

Few weeks is a little long. The overweight inspection doesn't need a few weeks. Depends on how much overweight and the touchdown vertical speed which can be checked in the computer. Then the mechanics can check how hard the touchdown was and then decide how much of a check they have to do. Of course if there is some structural damage, then the airplane is out of service for a bit. But the check itself is rather quick.
Airplanes can handle a lot more than one imagines.
I did an overweight landing in the 744 simulator. MTOW was 395.6 tons and we landed with 385.0 tons. Pretty high approach speeds, pretty hot brakes (got cooled down by the fire brigade) and long landing distance. But apart from that, all was well. And the stress for the cell isn't too bad if you do a normal touchdown.

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineblueshamu330s From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 3073 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 9364 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 3):
Not necessarily - flight to Banjul (?) would put the A320 at MTOW or near as damnit. If there was a medical emergency or MX issue the crew cannot dump fuel and she wouldnt be at safe landing weight yet on reaching Bristol, so they either land overweight (which would put the frame out of action for a few weeks while they do surveys etc) they probably circled to burn off as much fuel as possible to get down to a safe landing weight - obviously if the medical problem was a stroke or a heart attack then they'd eat it and land immediately, (full emergency, inc fire services for a possible brake fire etc) but if the problem was something MX-related or a medical emergency not bad enough to divert immediately but bad enough to warrant the aircraft holding while they assess the patient, then they would circle to burn fuel to land at a safe weight so that once they've bussed a new crew in (am assuming they didnt have a spare crew on board to fly the return leg?) they can be on their way after filing new flight plan etc.

Jambo bwana ! 

Did you stop once to breathe in that sentence Chris ?! LOL

No medical div., it was just a weather div and yes, Acelanzarote, it's the a/c for the now rather delayed ACE.  



So I drive a 4x4. So what?! Tax the a$$ off me for it...oh, you already have... :-(
User currently offlinejumpjet From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 293 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9323 times:

Thanks chaps, as a complete aviation amateur, I'm once again indebted to you all!

Regards

JJ


User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9119 posts, RR: 76
Reply 8, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9323 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting jumpjet (Reply 7):
as a complete aviation amateur,

We all have to start at one point. Everybody here in the forum didn't know anything about aviation when he was born  

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4725 posts, RR: 50
Reply 9, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 9108 times:

Quoting wilco737 (Reply 8):
Everybody here in the forum didn't know anything about aviation when he was born

Except from me, I was born with encyclopaedic knowledge... you should know that  



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlinejumpjet From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 293 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 9059 times:

Do you ever watch the TV series "The Big Bang Theory". I'm sure you lot out there in aviation cyberspace are just like the four main characters in that!! p.s. that's actually a compliment!!

User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4725 posts, RR: 50
Reply 11, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 9033 times:

Quoting jumpjet (Reply 10):
Do you ever watch the TV series "The Big Bang Theory". I'm sure you lot out there in aviation cyberspace are just like the four main characters in that!! p.s. that's actually a compliment!!

As long as it's leonard it's fine, Sheldon I'm not so sure  



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlinenighthawk From UK - Scotland, joined Sep 2001, 5186 posts, RR: 33
Reply 12, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 9018 times:

Quoting JRadier (Reply 11):
As long as it's leonard it's fine, Sheldon I'm not so sure  

I think you are definitely more of a Sheldon... or even Wolowitz!      !



That'll teach you
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9119 posts, RR: 76
Reply 13, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 8774 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting JRadier (Reply 9):
Except from me, I was born with encyclopaedic knowledge... you should know that  

Oh right... Who had the nickname "the brain"? was it you or me   

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4725 posts, RR: 50
Reply 14, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 8539 times:

Quoting nighthawk (Reply 12):

I think you are definitely more of a Sheldon... or even Wolowitz! !

At least I can talk to women, I don't envy you Rajesh  
Quoting wilco737 (Reply 13):

Oh right... Who had the nickname "the brain"? was it you or me

Me   You were the muscle!  



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9119 posts, RR: 76
Reply 15, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 8534 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting JRadier (Reply 14):
Me   You were the muscle!  

   Very good one 

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlinejumpjet From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 293 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 8301 times:

I'm still searching for * * * Penny * * * Penny * * * Penny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

User currently offlineshed360 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2008, 28 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7884 times:

it in fact diverted to brs twice. After the first ime it had another go at ext then returned back to brs!


Slow,fat, and ugly but I love 'em - Long live the Shed!
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11723 posts, RR: 60
Reply 18, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7782 times:

Quoting JRadier (Reply 9):
Except from me, I was born with encyclopaedic knowledge... you should know that  

So you are like Grolsch then - only born when fully ready  
Quoting jumpjet (Reply 4):
I'm only 3 miles from Exeter airport and it all seems fine.

I found that odd too - I headed North on the train through Exeter at about 6am this morning and there was no fog, not even in the Exe Valley where you often get patches. Must have been sudden radiation fog once the sun burned the dew off.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlinewellies From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2009, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (3 years 3 months 1 day ago) and read 3918 times:

Quoting jumpjet (Reply 4):

I find most of the UK charters (TCX, TOM etc) to be wildly out on route/flight no. on Plane Finder. With any other airlines if it looks a bit dodgy you can research the flight number and come up with the correct route, but I can rarely do that with those. As an example, last night's TCX from AYT to NWI, which came over my house at around 10,000ft (about 15m from NWI) came up as AYT-MAN! That's a long way to go at 10,000!  


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EZY A320 In Trouble After Departing PFO posted Thu Aug 21 2008 05:24:58 by CYatUK
Ryanair In Trouble Over Environmental Claims posted Wed Jul 18 2007 17:42:41 by Revo
NZ Pilot In Trouble Over Diversion For Ice Burg posted Sun Jan 21 2007 05:31:40 by 777ER
Fokker In Trouble Over Antwerp posted Wed Mar 28 2001 15:56:43 by BelugaBoy
Ex-Virgin A340-311 Flying In Circles Over Celtic Sea posted Tue Sep 13 2011 07:17:16 by tomgib
WestJet, Emirates In Talks Over Possible Alliance posted Tue Dec 7 2010 15:14:59 by crazyfoo88
Rumours: Hamburg International In Trouble posted Tue Oct 19 2010 05:58:50 by vfw614
AirBaltic In Trouble? posted Thu Oct 7 2010 08:42:40 by Someone83
Star1 In Trouble. posted Thu Sep 23 2010 10:13:01 by AerLingus747
DL A320 In IST! (with Photo) posted Tue Sep 7 2010 23:10:28 by BoogyJay