Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Planes Left From Closed Runway At PIT  
User currently onlineltbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13195 posts, RR: 15
Posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 8919 times:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...lights-left-from-clo_n_990126.html

The FAA is investigating why ATC at PIT airport allowed 6 planes took off from a closed runway this past Thursday. I guess the runway was closed for maintenance but somehow the ground ATC staff either wasn't aware of it or they failed to remember that. Apparently there was no problems, but it still this is an apparently boo-boo that needs investigation as it could have been some serious problems.

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineshufflemoomin From Denmark, joined Jun 2010, 480 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 8342 times:

Wasn't there an accident once where a plane crashed into maintenance trucks on a runway? Luckily this played out fine, but as you said, it could have gone much worse. It was nothing but luck.

User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21855 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 8191 times:

Quoting shufflemoomin (Reply 1):
Wasn't there an accident once where a plane crashed into maintenance trucks on a runway? Luckily this played out fine, but as you said, it could have gone much worse. It was nothing but luck.

You're thinking of the Singapore crash in Taipei.

And let's try and keep things in perspective - in that accident, there was actual construction and equipment on the runway. That is not always the case with a closed runway. ATC isn't going to clear an airplane for takeoff on a runway if they see that sort of thing, even if they think the runway is open. This was a misunderstanding, but nobody was in danger.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinewingnutmn From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 653 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 7774 times:

Also, a dc9 or 727 landed and crashed into a truck owing the runway when he didn't anseer radio calls. This was late 80's i believe at FSD.

Wingnut



Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing! It's a bonus if you can fly the plane again!!
User currently offlinetb727 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1648 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7708 times:

Quoting wingnutmn (Reply 3):
Also, a dc9 or 727 landed and crashed into a truck owing the runway when he didn't anseer radio calls. This was late 80's i believe at FSD.

Yep an Ozark DC-9-30 hit a plow in FSD, replaced the wing and plane flew until just a few years ago with NW.



Too lazy to work, too scared to steal!
User currently offlineNWAROOSTER From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1149 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 7652 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting tb727 (Reply 4):
Yep an Ozark DC-9-30 hit a plow in FSD, replaced the wing and plane flew until just a few years ago with NW.

This aircraft a DC-9-31, registration N994Z. Both main wings wee replaced off an Air Canada DC-9-32 that had a rear lav fire and made an emergency landing in Ohio. The aircraft flew with a -31 fuselage and -32 wings until Delta retired it.
This aircraft flew with Northeast Airlines, Delta Airlines, Ozark Airlines, Republic Airlines, after it got the new wings, Northwest Airlines and finished it flying career with Delta Airlines.   



Procrastination Is The Theft Of Time.......
User currently offlineOB1783P From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 5689 times:

Quoting shufflemoomin (Reply 1):
Wasn't there an accident once where a plane crashed into maintenance trucks on a runway?

On landing also, a Western DC-10 with major loss of life, back in 1979 in MEX. But the main cause of the crash was "Non-compliance with the meteorological minima for the approach procedure." The aircraft touched down partly in the grass before attempting to go-around. And then it hit the truck on the closed runway.



I've flown thousands of miles and I can tell you it's a lot safer than crossing the street!
User currently offlinenetjetsintl From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 593 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4923 times:

The runway was closed but no heavy equipment on it (thankfully)

Lots of ASAP forms to be filled from both sides (pilots & ATC controllers)


User currently offlinethrufru From Marshall Islands, joined Feb 2009, 224 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4667 times:

Unfortunately, ASAP reports won't do any good. An ASAP must be a single reporting incident, meaning the only way anyone would find out is if the individual party that had the incident reported it. Since this involved multiple parties, it won't qualify under ASAP. Now a NASA report might be a bit more appropriate, though. Guess it also seems like a few flight crews didn't review their NOTAMs.

User currently offlinenetjetsintl From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 593 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 4398 times:

Quoting thrufru (Reply 8):
Guess it also seems like a few flight crews didn't review their NOTAMs.

Correct, that'd be hard to explain when/if the FAA comes calling.

I'm not playing monday-morning quarteback, that can happen to ANYBODY


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21855 posts, RR: 55
Reply 10, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3135 times:

Quoting thrufru (Reply 8):
Guess it also seems like a few flight crews didn't review their NOTAMs.

NOTAMS change very quickly. I've had NOTAMS of approaches being out of service, and when I show up ATC says it's fine. I'm very cautious on the way down, of course, but I'll use the approach if they want me to. And if ATC clears me to use a runway that's NOTAMed closed, I'm inclined to do so as long as I don't see any obstructions on it. The most likely cause of that scenario (by a wide margin) is that someone went and changed the NOTAM between then and the time I checked them.

Quoting netjetsintl (Reply 9):
that can happen to ANYBODY

  

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinedxing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3098 times:

Quoting thrufru (Reply 8):
Unfortunately, ASAP reports won't do any good. An ASAP must be a single reporting incident, meaning the only way anyone would find out is if the individual party that had the incident reported it.


That's not the way it is where I work. You have 24 hours in which to file your ASAP once you realize your mistake, or a third party brings it to your attention, or you get to a place where you can file your ASAP.

Quoting Mir (Reply 10):
NOTAMS change very quickly


Yes, but this notam had been out since morning and the departures evidently happened later in the day.

I can't count the amount of times I've had to call LGA to see if they were going to extend their notamed construction curfew hours due to a ground delay program. Most times they have since the weather precluded the construction work from happening, but every-once in a while they stick to it so you have to vigilant. Especially true down in central and south America. When they say they are going to close, you can bank on it.

Since it was day time and the maintenance involved the runway lights its not that big of a deal. But let's say a chunk of concrete had been damaged by lightening leaving a hole in the runway.....that could have been a major problem.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21855 posts, RR: 55
Reply 12, posted (3 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2636 times:

Quoting dxing (Reply 11):
Yes, but this notam had been out since morning and the departures evidently happened later in the day.

From the perspective of the pilots, that could just be an indication that whatever was closing the runway was over with and it was reopening sooner than scheduled.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Express Airplane Off Runway At PIT posted Thu Aug 31 2006 23:43:16 by N670UW
737 Off Runway At PIT posted Mon Jun 14 2004 18:36:20 by N670UW
Man W/Rucksack On Runway At LHR -27R Runway Closed posted Thu Mar 13 2008 08:10:23 by StarGoldLHR
3 Planes Off Runway At CLE: CLE Shut Down posted Tue Feb 12 2008 17:52:57 by Falcon84
MD80 Off The Runway At MCI, Airport Closed posted Sat Jan 29 2005 04:22:27 by OPNLguy
Runway At EWR Closed posted Fri Sep 5 2003 01:09:53 by Ybacpa
New Runway At MAN Closed Today posted Sun Jan 5 2003 23:16:18 by Dan330
Airports Closed, Yet Planes Left! posted Thu Sep 13 2001 18:06:48 by Woodsboy
Tame E190 Overran Runway At Quito posted Sat Sep 17 2011 16:10:12 by MATURRO727
Pictures From Passenger Trials At Winnipeg Airport posted Sat Sep 10 2011 17:55:24 by canadianpylon