Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Seattle International Terminal Expansion  
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11154 posts, RR: 59
Posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3905 times:

I came across this article about the Port of Seattle's plans to fix the bottleneck with international arrivals:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm.../2015571421_seatacterminal11m.html

Looking at the airside expansion proposal, which expands the existing FIS in the South Satellite, I see it also includes another airport people mover line to the main terminal:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2011/07/10/2015571731.pdf

What is the point of another airport people mover line? Is the current loop line not sufficient? It seems pretty redundant to me...

The landside proposal would build a new FIS next to Concourse A which would be connected with flying bridge:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2011/07/10/2015571716.pdf

Having an FIS by Concourse A makes sense, they should have built one from the very beginning when the new A gates and south terminal expansion were done. However, why bother with a flying bridge from the South Satellite? Why not just reconfigure some of the Concourse A gates to connect to the FIS and have many international flights arriving in Concourse A instead of the South Satellite?

Larger aircraft, like 747s, that wouldn't fit in the gates at Concourse A, could remain in the South Satellite and use the existing FIS facility. With much of the international traffic able to move to Concourse A, the congestion problems currently faced in the South Satellite wouldn't be an issue anymore. While Sea-Tac has seen very impressive international growth, I don't see its future filled with 747s and A380s. I see most international flights using A330s, 767s, 777s, and 787s.

Does anyone know when the Port of Seattle will announce its decision of which option it will pursue?


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSuperDash From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 574 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3400 times:

Welcome to Sea-Trash Airport. Their planning is non-existent and a total afterthought. But then again, for an airport with a spending problem, why do it right the first time, when you can spend craploads of other people's money later?

Bottom line, Concourse A SHOULD have been the international terminal and yes, they could have made it such that 2 A380s could fit on it.

Now they are spending $60M to move what seems like 316 airlines around the terminal (I think the number is 7 or 9). Just crazy and unnecessary. They could name that tune for NOTHING. If the airlines want to move, that's fine, they can pay and they can figure it out. There is a NO cost solution that POS opted out of (of course).

So yes, South Terminal is packed at lunchtime with both International flights and Delta flights. Emirates' arrival won't exactly help the South Terminal situation. Glad to have 'em but I hope you have Global Entry otherwise your connecting flight will have left without you.

Oh and for all of you that find renting a car a breeze at Sea-Trash....Hahahahahahaha
New $316B car rental facility modeled after the ultra efficient Laughlin, NV facility conveniently serving the Las Vegas McCarran Airport is coming real soon. Yep, renting a car, just wasted yet another 2 hours of your life. 2 hours, you will never get back. Enjoy.

Welcome to Seattle/Tacoma...please spend lots of your hard earned money here!


User currently offlineNutsaboutplanes From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 510 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 3299 times:

Rediculous. This airport has some of the highest fees in the states and some of the most inadequate facilities. I worked very closely with the Port of Seattle (POS) on a number of projects while at AS and they are inept, disorganized and armed to the teeth with red tape.

Should anybody not believe the incompetence that exists at SEA......just research the 1.4 BILLION DOLLAR 3RD RUNWAY. This project was originally supposed to cost less than 400 million.

Attention Washington Tax Payers: Whatever the Port tells you the terminal upgrade will cost, multiply by 3 and that will be more realistic.



American Airlines, US Airways, Alaska Airlines, Northwest Airlines, America West Airlines, USAFR
User currently offlineseabosdca From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 5855 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3163 times:

Quoting Nutsaboutplanes (Reply 2):
Should anybody not believe the incompetence that exists at SEA......just research the 1.4 BILLION DOLLAR 3RD RUNWAY. This project was originally supposed to cost less than 400 million.

Not disputing the general principle that POS is divorced from reality, but that particular problem wasn't really POS's fault. Blame the neighbors who simply would not give up and litigated every single step at multiple levels.


User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9828 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2758 times:

SEA has a problem with international arrivals. The quantity of international flights increased faster than the airport had planned. It was British Airways (LHR), Eva Air (TPE), United (NRT), Northwest (AMS, NRT), Asiana (ICN), American (NRT), Aeroflot (SVO) and Scandinavian (CPH) when the terminal A expansion was improved. Now Icelandair (KEF), Hainan (PEK), Delta (KIX, PEK), Korean (ICN), Lufthansa (FRA), Air France (CDG), Condor (FRA), and Alaska (Various Mexico). That almost doubled the traffic at the South Satellite with no expansion.

The purpose of the expansion is to increase the size of the baggage facility and immigration desks. It makes sense and most of it will be done below ground. Another problem which is finally hoping to be addressed is the double baggage problem. Baggage carts aren't allowed on the train, so people double collect baggage at the main terminal after clearing customs. That's a huge waste.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlinefrmrCapCadet From United States of America, joined May 2008, 1744 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2631 times:

Newly required security arrangements post 9-11 totally messed up the existing architecture. (this was also true at a lot of airports the world around). Anyone able to chime in?


Buffet: the airline business...has eaten up capital...like..no other (business)
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11154 posts, RR: 59
Reply 6, posted (3 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2513 times:

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 4):
Another problem which is finally hoping to be addressed is the double baggage problem. Baggage carts aren't allowed on the train, so people double collect baggage at the main terminal after clearing customs. That's a huge waste.

This will only be addressed if they go with the landside option.



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AKL Announces Expansion Of International Terminal posted Thu Feb 23 2006 06:17:50 by 777ER
Stockton (SCK) Begins Terminal Expansion; +Oct #'s posted Fri Nov 5 2010 07:35:03 by FATflyer
HND New International Terminal (vid) posted Sat Oct 16 2010 04:31:12 by centrair
AUS Main Terminal Expansion? posted Sun Aug 29 2010 18:54:31 by Western727
SCK Studying Terminal Expansion Alternatives posted Fri Apr 16 2010 08:07:05 by FATFlyer
LAX Begins Bradley Terminal Expansion posted Tue Feb 23 2010 14:43:23 by travelin man
ATL New International Terminal Progress? posted Wed Sep 23 2009 16:36:02 by Deltajets
BHM Terminal Expansion posted Thu Jul 2 2009 22:32:51 by TSS
Terminal B Expansion IAH Discussion posted Wed Jun 10 2009 12:00:53 by Drerx7
Bristol International Airport Expansion posted Thu Jan 22 2009 05:39:23 by BeyondBristol